The Influence of Familiarity on Memory for Faces and Mask Wearing

preprint OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic the wearing of face masks became mandatory in public areas or at workplaces in many countries. While offering protection, the coverage of large parts of our face (nose, mouth and chin) may have consequences for face recognition. This seems especially important in the context of contact tracing which can require memory of familiar and unfamiliar contacts and whether they were wearing a mask. In this study, we tested how well participants perform at remembering faces and whether they wore a mask, and if this depends on familiarity. Our results show that: a) Participants remembered familiar faces better than unfamiliar ones, regardless of mask wearing. b) Participants remembered unmasked faces better than masked faces, regardless of familiarity. c) Participants were significantly worse at remembering whether an unfamiliar face was wearing a mask or not – even if they indicated remembering the face. d) Participants showed a bias to indicate no memory of unfamiliar faces. e) Participants showed a bias to indicate that unfamiliar faces wore a mask, even if they did not. In sum, it was harder to remember both, the identity of unfamiliar faces and whether they wore a mask. These findings have practical relevance for contact tracing and epidemic control.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0