Suppression of Influenza Virus Infection by Rhinovirus Interference – at the Population, Individual and Cellular Levels
preprint
OA: gold
publisher-OA-unknown
Abstract
Background: Influenza virus (IV) and the rhinovirus (RV) are the two most common circulating respiratory viruses circulating. Natural viral interference has been suggested between them. The effect of such at the population level has been described in temperate region, while its effect at the individual and cellular levels warrants further validation. In this study, we described the respiratory virus epidemiology and the co-infection landscape in the hospitalized population and investigated the distinct molecular pathways involved in the inhibition of virus replication.Methods: Nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPAs) collected from patients during 2015 to 2019 were examined for the presence of respiratory viruses. The correlation of the monthly prevalence between all the tested respiratory viruses, the co-infection rate and the temporal interference of RV and IV were tested. The viral interference was validated in vitro by conducting sequential RV and IV infections in the well-differentiated primary human airway epithelial cells. The contributing molecular pathways were determined by transcriptome analysis. Findings: A total of 112,926 NPAs were evaluated, and the Enterovirus/RV was the most prevalent respiratory virus detected. The negative correlation between EV/RV and IVs prevalence was independent of age and meteorological factors. Compare with other viruses, EV/RV had a significantly lower incidence of co-infection with IVs. Prior exposure to RV inhibited the replication of IV species A, B and oseltamivir-resistance stain in vitro. RV uniquely downregulated genes related to processing of viral mRNA, ribosomal proteins, translation and influenza infection. Interpretation: Epidemiological surveillance and the sequential infection in vitro suggested viral interference between EV/RV and IV operates at the population, individual and cellular levels.Funding Information: This study was supported by the General Research Fund (Ref: 24107017 and 14103119 to RWYC), Health and Medical Research Fund (Ref: COVID190112 to RWYC) and the Chinese University Direct Grant for Research (Ref: 2019·073 to RWYC).Declaration of Interests: None to declare. Ethics Approval Statement: This study was approved by the Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong – New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee (CREC: 2015·097 and 2019·120). 2015.097 has been approved on 3 March 2015; 2019.120 has been approved on 5 March 2019
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: publisher-OA-unknown
· commercial use NOT OK
· attribution required