Development and Preliminary Clinical Evaluation of a Multifunctional Operative Support Arm in Reproductive Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study
rct
OA: closed
AI-generated summary
This study developed and evaluated a multifunctional operative support arm for reproductive laparoscopic surgery in a randomized controlled trial.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate short-term clinical outcomes, surgeon-reported fatigue, and staff user experience associated with a multifunctional operative support arm in reproductive laparoscopic surgery.
DESIGN: Single-center, parallel-group randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Tertiary university-affiliated reproductive medicine center.
PATIENTS: One hundred women aged 25-40 years undergoing laparoscopic surgery for stage I pelvic endometriosis, hydrosalpinx, or benign ovarian cysts.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to surgery using the multifunctional operative support arm or a conventional passive support condition.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was surgeon-reported fatigue assessed using a 0-10 visual analog scale. Secondary outcomes included staff satisfaction and device-related comfort. Clinical outcomes included operative duration, postoperative infection, length of stay, anti-Müllerian hormone, and antral follicle count.
RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Operative duration, length of stay, postoperative infection, and ovarian reserve indicators did not differ significantly. Mixed-effects analysis of 550 surgeon and 450 nurse evaluations showed lower surgeon fatigue with the device than with conventional support (-0.66, 95% CI -0.78 to -0.54; p < 0.001). Ventilation, temperature control, and comfort scores were also higher, although satisfaction differences were small.
CONCLUSION: The device improved staff-reported ergonomic comfort without adverse short-term clinical effects, but confirmation with objective measures is needed.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-08T06:08:32.324769+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-08-08T06:03:55.148890+00:00