The common effect of value on prioritized memory and category representation
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
The way we represent categories depends on both the frequency and value of the category’s members. Thus, for instance, the “prototype” of a category tends to have especially common and valuable features. Notably, recent research on memory suggests that we tend to prioritize memory for frequent and valuable things. Although work on conceptual representation and work on prioritized memory have thus far proceeded almost entirely independently, the patterns of existing findings provide evidence for a link between these two phenomena. In particular, these patterns provide evidence for the hypothesis that the impact of value on prioritized memory explains the impact of value on conceptual representation.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00