Full text
2,238 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.
You must log in to post a comment.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.
Add a Comment
You must log in to post a comment.
Comments
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
Pair bonding is a key social behaviour but remains understudied in reptiles despite a growing body of evidence suggesting that some species exhibit complex sociality. The lack of evidence regarding the expression of pair association in social lizards species hampers our understanding of its effects on captive welfare. As a first step towards a better understanding of pair related social behaviour in lizards, we investigated if physical closeness, a measure often used to qualify pair bonding in mammals and birds, can be used to assess pair association strength in captive tokay geckos (Gekko gecko). We analysed how physical closeness is related to measures of spatial behaviour collected through scan sampling across two sampling years. Physical closeness was not related to movement but to hiding and basking behaviour, albeit not consistently across years. We also show that although on average our measure of pair association strength did not change across the experimental period, individuals that were paired with new individuals in 2024 exhibit a change. If differences in pair association also occur in the wild and if they confer different fitness outcomes is unknown. However, our results have implications for captive welfare and we propose to monitor socially housed individuals closely to avoid unnecessary socially induced stress.
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2F06X
Behavior and Ethology, Zoology
pair bond, reptile, social behaviour, Squamata, Welfare
Published: 2025-05-27 04:15
Last Updated: 2025-05-27 04:54
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Conflict of interest statement:
None
Data and Code Availability Statement:
Data generated by the systematic literature search are available on the Open Science framework: https://osf.io/8h7wy/?view_only=1c74a7ad9e2248eaaf4b2c3f605ca39f
Language:
English
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.