Functional or Dysfunctional? A Refreshed Perspective on Functional Feeding Groups

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,807 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Functional feeding groups (FFGs), introduced in the 1970s, provided a framework for understanding freshwater ecosystems by classifying macroinvertebrates according to feeding mode and diet. Since then, the FFG approach has been widely applied and has significantly advanced our knowledge of ecosystem processes and functions. However, the framework represents a simplified view of complex trophic interactions, ecological networks, and ecosystem functioning, and its misuse can lead to misleading conclusions. Addressing contemporary challenges in freshwater ecology requires updated approaches and methodologies. In this paper, we offer a renewed perspective on the FFG framework, outlining its limitations and providing guidance on contexts where its application is appropriate—and where it is not. Finally, we propose a framework that relaxes key assumptions of the original model and incorporates emerging technologies, enabling deeper insights into the dynamic trophic interactions of freshwater macroinvertebrates. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2JD3V Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Life Sciences, Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Macroinvertebratesforaging, diet, traits, Macroinvertebrates, foraging, diet, traits Published: 2025-12-11 13:22 Last Updated: 2025-12-11 13:22 Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: Not applicable. Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00