Interacting disturbances reshape bird assemblages via divergent community trajectories across southeastern Australia

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,869 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Species counts can remain stable even as ecological communities collapse. This paradox exposes a critical blind spot in biodiversity monitoring: richness metrics miss the compositional upheaval that defines modern ecological change. As human pressures intensify, specialists decline and generalists proliferate, creating numerically similar but functionally different communities. Using three decades of citizen-science data on 272 bird species across southeastern Australia's fragmented eucalypt woodlands, we analysed how woodland conversion, livestock grazing, and dominance by the native noisy miner (Manorina melanocephala) reshape species richness and β-diversity. By partitioning β-diversity into turnover and nestedness, we distinguished distinct community change processes. Land conversion and noisy miner presence reduced species turnover whilst increasing nestedness, indicating directional filtering and systematic loss. Lightly grazed woodlands showed the opposite, with higher turnover and lower nestedness, indicating resilience through species replacement. When disturbances co-occurred, communities followed novel trajectories as tolerant and introduced species assembled into unique configurations, boosting turnover at broader scales. Species-level analyses revealed that widespread generalists drove homogenisation while rare, range-restricted species generated local distinctiveness. Critically, high β-diversity was not always ecologically valuable, as some unique sites harboured disturbance-adapted taxa. Consequently, community responses to disturbance followed no single rule. Depending on the combination of stressors, communities underwent filtering, replacement, or novel divergence. Conservation strategies must therefore go beyond simple species counts and aggregate indices. Understanding whether ecosystems are degrading, restorable, or shifting toward alternative stable states requires metrics that capture these underlying processes. In an era of inevitable ecological transformation, the challenge is not only to halt biodiversity loss but to manage the nature of ecological change. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2RD3Q Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Reverse Keystone Species, Multiple stressors, Local Contribution to Beta Diversity (LCBD), Species Contribution to Beta Diversity (SCBD) Published: 2025-11-12 09:51 Last Updated: 2025-11-12 09:51 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00