Sexually antagonistic selection: a review of the theory and its implications

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,251 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Sexually antagonistic selection arises when females and males have different fitness optima for traits with a shared genetic basis, so that the same alleles are favoured in one sex but disfavoured in the other. It has been implicated in a wide range of ecological and evolutionary processes, from the maintenance of a sex load to the evolution of sex chromosomes. Mathematical models have long been central to understanding sexually antagonistic selection and its consequences. Here, we review the theory of sexual antagonism across population genetic, adaptive dynamics, and quantitative genetic models. We highlight how these approaches give concordant and complementary descriptions of evolution in response to sex-specific selection and consider extensions incorporating genetic drift, non-random mating, demographic effects, jointly evolving multiple traits, sex-specific inheritance, and the evolution of genetic modifiers. We then discuss how these results bear on the sex load, the maintenance of genetic polymorphism, the evolution of sex linkage and sex chromosomes, and the origins of sexual dimorphism. By making assumptions and mechanisms explicit across approaches, we identify which conclusions are robust and which depend on specific modelling choices and finally outline open questions for future theoretical work. https://doi.org/10.32942/X28M22 Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Evolution, Population Biology sex-specific selection, sex load, evolutionary theory, Balancing selection, dominance reversal, polymorphism, sex chromosomes, sex-specific gene expression, sexual dimorphism, antagonistic pleiotropy Published: 2026-05-09 01:23 Last Updated: 2026-05-13 19:08 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: Not applicable Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00