Introduction to the Work Ability Index – A Guide for Rehabilitation Practitioners

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

The purpose of this report is to introduce the _Work Ability Index_ to a rehabilitation audience and to provide some background on its scope and features. As an indication of its popularity, (a) it is available in 26 languages; (b) it has been applied for more than twenty years and (c) from 1991 there are 388 records including “Work Ability Index” in PubMed. A summary of the data from 29 previous studies of 31,472 participants is provided and it indicated an overall mean of 38.94. Overall this mean would be categorised as a “good” work ability index. As expected, studies of rehabilitation or illness samples indicate “poor” work ability. Each of the 10 questions in the assessment is introduced. The conceptual nature of work ability is reviewed and some issues are raised about the validity of the scoring of the assessment. A conceptual framework for the work ability process is outlined.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00