Efferent signaling along nociceptive peripheral terminals in vivo is enhanced during inflammation

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 83,760 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Efferent signaling along nociceptive peripheral terminals in vivo is enhanced during inflammation | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results Efferent signaling along nociceptive peripheral terminals in vivo is enhanced during inflammation Devora Gershon , View ORCID Profile Omer Barkai , Nurit Engelmayer , Ben Katz , Shaya Lev , View ORCID Profile Alexander M Binshtok doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.01.636018 Devora Gershon 1 Department of Medical Neurobiology; Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada, The Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Medicine , Jerusalem, Israel , 91120; 2 The Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem , Israel Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Omer Barkai 1 Department of Medical Neurobiology; Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada, The Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Medicine , Jerusalem, Israel , 91120; 2 The Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem , Israel 3 F.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA 02115, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Omer Barkai Nurit Engelmayer 1 Department of Medical Neurobiology; Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada, The Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Medicine , Jerusalem, Israel , 91120; 2 The Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem , Israel Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Ben Katz 1 Department of Medical Neurobiology; Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada, The Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Medicine , Jerusalem, Israel , 91120; 2 The Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem , Israel Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Shaya Lev 1 Department of Medical Neurobiology; Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada, The Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Medicine , Jerusalem, Israel , 91120; 2 The Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem , Israel Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Alexander M Binshtok 1 Department of Medical Neurobiology; Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada, The Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Medicine , Jerusalem, Israel , 91120; 2 The Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem , Israel Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Alexander M Binshtok For correspondence: alexander.binshtok{at}mail.huji.ac.il Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Preview PDF Abstract Primary nociceptors are essentially characterized as afferent neurons carrying noxious sensory information from the periphery to the CNS. However, the information flow on primary nociceptors is bidirectional. Nociceptor peripheral terminals release a variety of mediators to the target organ in the vicinity of the injured area. These mediators promote sensitization of adjacent sensory neurons, vasodilation, and edema and affect innate and adaptive immunity, leading to hyperalgesia and inflammation that often expands beyond the injured areas. Many theories associate these phenomena with the antidromic action potential propagation along nociceptor terminals; however, the antidromic efferent signaling at the single nociceptor terminals has never been demonstrated. Here, using in vivo calcium imaging from the individual nociceptive terminals innervating the mouse cornea together with a computational approach, we demonstrated that short-lasting activation of a single terminal in vivo was sufficient to activate the remote, non-activated terminal, which branches from the same nociceptor fiber. This increase was dependent on the activation of voltage-gated sodium and calcium channels. Moreover, we showed that the efferent signaling along nociceptive terminals increases under inflammatory conditions, culminating in enhanced calcium signaling in the remote non-activated terminals. This inflammation-induced increase in intra-terminal calcium could trigger the enhanced release of inflammatory mediators, spilling over wider areas and affecting terminals from adjacent unstimulated receptive fields, leading to the expansion of hyperalgesia and inflammation. Introduction Primary nociceptor neurons encode the modality, intensity, and location of noxious stimuli and transmit this information to the CNS. Although devoid of synaptic connections, primary nociceptive afferents are not simple signal conductors but complex molecular structures with intricate architecture that can alter the sensory information flowing to the CNS 1 – 4 . These alterations could result from the modulation of the excitable properties of primary nociceptors by various mediators released from the injured tissue 5 , glial cells 6 , or sensory neurons themselves 1 , 7 . The latter, inter-nociceptive paracrine effects could be induced in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) 7 and at the target tissue via the release of various neuropeptides from the nociceptor peripheral terminals 8 . Glutamate, substance P (SP), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), and other neuromodulators that are released from the peripheral nociceptive terminal endings activate and sensitize sensory terminals 9 – 13 , often even in adjacent uninjured tissues, thus increasing their responsiveness to the applied stimuli, thereby expanding the hyperalgesic area 14 . In addition, the mediators released from nociceptive terminals can trigger neurogenic inflammation, yet again expanding the affected areas 8 , 15 – 21 . The vasoactive effects of these mediators (specifically, CGRP) are considered the triggers in initiating migraine attacks 22 . Notably, the release of neuropeptides from peripheral nociceptive terminals is critical for mediating local inflammation, apoptosis of dermal macrophages activating hair growth, and, importantly, for triggering the activation of local immune responses 15 , 20 , 23 – 27 . Therefore, understanding the mechanism of the peripheral release of neuropeptides by nociceptor terminals and its modulation in pathological conditions is of utmost importance. At the effector organs, nociceptive terminals compose convoluted terminal trees by converging with other terminal branches from the same fiber 2 , 28 (see also Figure 1A, B ). When tissue is exposed to noxious stimuli, activation of the nociceptor terminal leads to action potential (APs) generation at the terminal 29 that propagates orthodromically toward the CNS. Theoretically, when APs reach a convergence point with non-activated terminals of the same terminal tree, they could invade these terminals and propagate antidromically to their terminal tip - a phenomenon known as axon reflex 8 , 20 . A resulting depolarization at the terminal tip could be sufficient to activate voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCC) and trigger a rapid and local release of neural mediators from the non-activated terminals 30 – 32 , which in turn may induce vasodilation, plasma extravasation and edema, also affecting nociceptive excitability and triggering the activation of immune responses 8 , 20 . This local ortho-to-antidromic signaling is biophysically sound and implied in the literature as a possible mechanism for the release of the mediators from primary nociceptors 15 ; however, the propagation of signals from a single activated terminal to the remote non-activated terminal was never demonstrated at the level of a terminal tree of a single nociceptor fiber. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Activation of the nociceptor terminal triggers calcium elevation in the remote non-activated terminal of the same terminal tree A. Scheme depicting the experimental procedure. First, changes in the intra-terminal calcium following focal calibrated puff application of capsaicin were recorded from the nociceptive terminal at the corneal superficial epithelium surface (Terminal A ) in anesthetized, head-stabilized mice. Then, the lens was moved and refocused on a remote (at least 200 μm) terminal, which is a part of the same terminal tree, i.e., belongs to the same nociceptor neuron (Terminal B ), but the puff pipette was kept at the same position adjacent to Terminal A . Five minutes after the recording from Terminal A , a second puff application to Terminal A with the same parameters was applied, but the calcium responses were recorded from Terminal B . B. Representative image of a terminal tree with exemplary Terminal A and Terminal B ( arrows ). C. Representative epifluorescent images and traces of optical recording of the changes in fluorescent intensity from Terminal A ( left ) and remote Terminal B ( right ) following the application of 0.5 μM capsaicin on Terminal A . Representative of 40 out of 85 experiments. The yellow arrows indicate the region of interest (ROI) from which the recordings were performed. Dashed lines outline the location of the puff pipette for the activation of Terminal A . Inset: Pie chart of the fractions of Terminals B that showed an increase in intra-terminal calcium ( responders, red ) or did not respond ( non-responders, gray ) to the activation of Terminal A by capsaicin. n = 85 experiments from 85 eyes, N=85 mice. D. Violin plot showing the distribution of the ratios of peak fluorescence intensity measured in Terminal B following activation of Terminal A , relative to the peak fluorescence intensity of Terminal A . The solid line represents the Median; the dotted line marks the ratio of “1”. Notably, most values fall below the ratio of “1”. Only terminal sets (Terminal A and Terminal B ) with successful Terminal B responses were compared; one sample Wilcoxon signed rank test, n=40 terminals, N=40 mice. E. Violin plots comparing the Means (solid line) and the distribution of response onsets in Terminal A and Terminal B following the application of capsaicin onto Terminal A . Only terminal sets (Terminal A and Terminal B ) with successful Terminal B responses were compared; paired t -test, n=40 terminals, N=40 mice. Here, using in vivo calcium imaging of nociceptor terminals branching from a terminal tree of individual nociceptor neurons, we demonstrated that activation of a single terminal with noxious stimuli triggers an antidromic propagation along a single terminal tree, leading to an increase in calcium in non-activated terminals. This increase in calcium may underlie the release of mediators from nociceptor neurons and trigger the expanded hyperalgesia, neurogenic inflammation, and modulation of the immune responses. Moreover, we showed that efferent signaling along the terminals of a single terminal tree, and the calcium increase in the remote terminals, is enhanced under inflammatory conditions, potentially leading to elevated release of various mediators and altering the functionality of target organs. Results Axon reflex in nociceptor terminals: capsaicin-evoked activation of a specific terminal triggers activation of remote terminals of the same terminal tree To demonstrate the existence of efferent signaling at the terminal tree of a single nociceptor fiber in vivo , we assessed the activity of unactivated individual nociceptor terminals following the activation of a single terminal of the same terminal tree. Accordingly, a combination of two Adeno-Associated Viruses (AAV) expressing RFP and GCaMPs was injected into the trigeminal nucleus (TG). Two weeks later, the expression of RFP and GCaMPs was observed in vivo in superficial ramified nociceptive terminals 33 innervating the corneal epithelial surface ( Figure 1A, B ). First, we identified nociceptor terminal trees composed of multiple intraepithelial individual terminal branches and terminating in the superficial epithelium with a terminal tip ( Figure 1A, B ). We focally applied capsaicin ( see Methods ) on a specific terminal tip (activated terminal, Terminal A ) and monitored the resulting changes in intra-terminal calcium ( see Methods , Figure 1A-C ). Next, we traced the axon of Terminal A and its bifurcations along the terminal tree to a distant superficial terminal belonging to the same fiber (Terminal B , Figure 1A, B ). To avoid the possibility of Terminal B being activated due to capsaicin diffusion during Terminal A activation, a distance of at least 200 μm between Terminal A and Terminal B was kept. This distance exceeds a previously determined calculated distance for capsaicin spillover 34 . While the lens was repositioned and refocused on Terminal B , the puff pipette was kept at the original position above Terminal A . After allowing full recovery of Terminal A, which takes about 5 min 29 , a second puff application of capsaicin was given, and the calcium responses were recorded from Terminal B ( see Methods , Figure 1A-C ). We assumed that if efferent propagation exists, we should be able to detect an increase in calcium in Terminal B following the activation of Terminal A . Indeed, we found that the activation of Terminal A triggers calcium elevation in Terminal B in ∼ 50% of cases (40 out of 85 terminals, 47%, Figure 1C , inset ). The responses in Terminal B activated following the activation of Terminal A were significantly smaller than the responses in Terminal A (Amplitude TerminalB /Amplitude TerminalA = 0.74 ± 0.1, Figure 1D ). As expected, the responses in Terminal B following the activation of Terminal A appeared with later onset (∼ 150 ms) than those in Terminal A ( Figure 1E ). Our previous computational data suggest that capsaicin-induced terminal depolarization in nociceptor-like terminals decays rapidly with distance in the absence of voltage-gated sodium channels (Na V ) and the generation of action potentials (AP) 2 . Therefore, we hypothesized that the response in Terminal B after the activation of Terminal A is triggered by capsaicin-induced AP generation along Terminal A that then propagates antidromically towards Terminal B . To examine this, we recorded the Terminal A -induced response of Terminal B in the presence of the Na V blocker oxybuprocaine 35 . Applying oxybuprocaine to mice corneas ( see Methods ) did not affect the capsaicin-induced activation of Terminal A but completely and reversibly prevented calcium elevation in Terminal B ( Figure 2 ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Blockade of voltage-gated sodium channels prevents activation of a remote terminal A. Representative traces of optical recordings from Terminal A ( left ) and Terminal B ( right ) following activation of Terminal A with 0.5 μM capsaicin before and after treatment with 0.4% oxybuprocaine and 1h after oxybuprocaine washout. Note that the response in Terminal B was annulled after treatment with oxybuprocaine and restored following washout. Representative of 6 experiments. B. Box plots and individual paired values (color coded) of the fluorescence intensities of Terminal A ( left ) and Terminal B ( right ) following the application of capsaicin on Terminal A before and after application of oxybuprocaine and after 1h of oxybuprocaine washout; RM one-way ANOVA with posthoc Bonferroni; n = 6 terminals from 6 different eyes from N=6 mice. Altogether, these results demonstrate that activating a single nociceptor terminal triggers the activation of remote terminals, which requires antidromic AP propagation. Stimulation of the nociceptive terminal triggers activation of voltage-gated calcium channels at the remote unstimulated terminal What could be the source of calcium increase in the remote Terminal B ? The distance between Terminal A and Terminal B, which exceeds the calculated distance of capsaicin spillover and the dependence of calcium signals in Terminal B on Na V -induced AP propagation, suggests that calcium elevation in Terminal B is most likely independent of TRPV1 channel activation. Therefore, we hypothesized that calcium entry in remote terminals is mediated by voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCC) activated by depolarization from antidromically propagating APs. If the latter is the case, blockade of VGCC will affect Terminal A -induced calcium elevation in Terminal B . We and others demonstrated that nociceptor terminals express functional VGCC 29 , 36 , 37 and that the inhibition of L-, N-, and T-type VGCC by benidipine 38 abolishes electrically evoked calcium signals at the terminals 29 . These results suggest that L-, N-, and T-type VGCC constitutes the majority of VGCC at the terminals. Therefore, we examined the effect of blocking L-, N-, and T-type VGCC by benidipine on the responsiveness of Terminal B following activation of Terminal A . Similar to our previous results 29 , the treatment with benidipine decreased the calcium response of Terminal A to capsaicin ( Figure 3A , upper traces , B ). Importantly, benidipine abolished the calcium signals in Terminal B following Terminal A activation ( Figure 3A , lower traces , B ) in all terminals, including those where the capsaicin-induced signal was not, or only slightly, affected by benedictine ( Figure 3B ). These results suggest calcium entry at the remote non-activated terminal requires activation of VGCC. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3. Blockade of voltage-gated calcium channels prevents calcium increase in a remote terminal A. Representative traces of optical recordings from Terminal A ( top ) and Terminal B ( bottom ) following activation of Terminal A with 0.5 μM capsaicin before and after 60 min incubation with benidipine (50 μM). B. Box plots and individual paired values (color coded) of the terminal fluorescence intensities of Terminal A ( left ) and Terminal B ( right ) following the application of capsaicin on Terminal A before and after incubation with benidipine. Note that the application of benidipine prevents the activation of the remote terminals. One-sample t-test; n = 7 terminals from 7 different eyes from N=7 mice In simulated inflammation-like conditions, activation of the nociceptor terminal leads to increased antidromic propagation Inflammation causes nociceptor hyperexcitability 5 , which could lead to an increase in both afferent and, consequently, efferent signaling along the terminal tree, thus amplifying the activation of remote terminals. We used a numerical model of nociceptor neurons with the terminal tree 2 , 29 to predict how the efferent signaling changes in inflammatory conditions. To reflect our previous experimental findings, showing no functional availability of voltage-gated sodium channels (Na V ) at the distal terminal part 29 , we annulled Na V conductance along the first 25 μm of the terminal fiber such that the capsaicin-induced depolarization propagates passively over the first 25 μm of the terminal (Na V -less compartment). After 25 μm, a “propagation” part begins with a spike initiation zone (SIZ) in which normal sodium channel conductance is present 29 ( see Methods , Figure 4A ). Under these control conditions, the activation of Terminal A with simulated capsaicin-like current resulted in three depolarizing voltage deflections of ∼60 mV at the tip of Terminal B ( Figure 4B , blue electrode and traces ). Interestingly, at the “propagation” zone of Terminal B , where voltage-gated sodium channels were present, the resulting depolarizatory deflections were ∼20 mV higher than those measured at the Terminal B tip (ΔVm Tip = 61.4±0.4 mV vs. ΔVm SIZ = 83.7±2.8 mV, Figure 4B , green electrode and traces ), suggesting a substantial voltage decay along with the “passive” Na V -less distal part of Terminal B . Download figure Open in new tab Figure 4. In simulated inflammatory-like conditions, the efferent signaling along the nociceptor terminal tree increases A. A scheme depicting a modeled structure of nociceptive terminals with a terminal tree. Each terminal is composed of a distal compartment that does not express voltage-gated sodium channels (Na V -less, grey ), which is limited by a spike initiation zone (SIZ) from which a compartment that contains Na V conductance begins (“propagation” compartment, red ). Terminal A (indicated by the red pipette) was stimulated by a simulated capsaicin-like current (depicted near Terminal A ), and the response was recorded from the tip (Na V -less, indicated by a blue electrode) and the “propagation” zone (green electrode) of Terminal B . B. Left , A scheme of a simulated control condition, in which an action potential is initiated in the SIZ of Terminal A , located 25 μm from the terminal tip. Right , overlapping traces recorded from the Terminal B ’s tip ( blue ) and the “propagation” zone ( green ) following the activation of Terminal A by a capsaicin-like current. Note a substantial decay of the depolarizing deflections from the “propagation” zone to the terminal tip. C. Same as B, but in simulated inflammatory-like conditions. In these conditions, the SIZ of Terminal A and Terminal B were shifted towards the terminal tip and located 10 μm from the tip. Note that in these conditions, similar activation of Terminal A led to a more substantial depolarization at the “propagation” zone of Termnimal B that only slightly decayed when it reached the tip of Terminal B . Next, we simulated the inflammatory conditions by increasing the availability of Na V at the terminal end, as we previously demonstrated 29 ( see Methods ). We shifted the location of the SIZ towards the terminal tip so that the Na V -less zone ends 10 μm from the tip, and then the “propagation” zone begins. In these simulated inflammation-like conditions, applying the same capsaicin-like stimulation to Terminal A generated five larger (∼90 mV) depolarizing voltage deflections in Terminal B ( Figure 4C , blue electrode and traces ). The deflections detected at the Terminal B tip were ∼5 mV lower than the responses recorded from the “propagation” zone (ΔVm Tip = 90.2±2 mV vs. ΔVm SIZ = 95.5±2.9 mV, Figure 4C , green electrode and traces ). These results predict that activation of the nociceptor terminal induces antidromic propagation. In inflammatory-like conditions, the antidromic propagation increases, leading to increased depolarization at the terminal tip partly due to a decreased decay in the depolarization that reaches the terminal end of the remote terminal. In inflammatory conditions, stimulation of the nociceptor terminal leads to increased activation of the remote terminals Our computational results predicted that antidromic propagation towards unstimulated terminals increases under inflammatory conditions. Next, we examined whether, in vivo, under inflammatory conditions, the activation of a single terminal triggers a stronger activation of a remote terminal. Because of the high variability of the capsaicin-induced calcium responses due to the different depths of each terminal ending from the epithelial surface, a comparison can only be performed on the same terminal before and during inflammation ( see Methods ). Consequently, conventional inflammatory models that require comparisons of the terminal responses between different groups of animals were not applicable. Therefore, to examine the changes in efferent signaling in inflammatory conditions, we treated mice corneas with a combination of proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β and TNFα. We previously demonstrated that the combination of both cytokines leads to an increased response of the activated terminal to capsaicin 29 . Before examining the effect of the treatment on efferent signaling, we examined whether the application of IL-1β and TNFα is sufficient to trigger inflammatory hyperalgesia in mice. Indeed, applying capsaicin to the cornea after treatment with IL-1β and TNFα for 30 min significantly increased nocifensive behavior ( Figure 5A ). We therefore considered treatment with IL-1β and TNFα as an inflammatory model condition. Under these conditions, the responsiveness of Terminal A to capsaicin increased, and activation of Terminal A led to a significantly stronger response at Terminal B ( Figure 5B, C ), which appeared with a shorter onset than in the control conditions ( Figure 5D ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 5. In the inflammatory conditions, activation of the nociceptor terminal triggers enhanced activation of a remote terminal. A. Left , scheme depicting a behavioral experiment. Right , Box plot and individual paired values (color coded) of the number of forelimb eye wipes after corneal application of saline (Basal), compared to 0.5 μM of capsaicin applied to mice pretreated with Vehicle or a combination of 100 ng/mL TNFα and 100 pg/mL IL-1β for 30 min ( see Methods ). Because no statistical differences were detected between mice in the Control group (p=0.55, unpaired t -test, N=10 mice), their data were pulled into one group (Basal), and ordinary one-way ANOVA with posthoc Bonferroni was performed to assess the statistical significance (N=5 mice in each group). One-way ANOVA performed when the Basal groups were separated according to the treatment shows similar statistical significance (p=0.04, comparing the effect of capsaicin applied to the vehicle and TNFα and IL-1β treated group, N=5 mice in each group). B. Representative traces of optical recordings from Terminal A ( top ) and Terminal B ( bottom ) following activation of Terminal A with 0.5 μM capsaicin before and after 30 min co-incubation with 100 ng/mL TNFα and 100 pg/mL IL-1β. C. Box plots and individual paired values (color coded) of the terminal fluorescence intensities of Terminal A ( left ) and Terminal B ( right ), following the application of capsaicin on Terminal A before and after incubation with TNFα and IL-1β. One-sample t-test; n = 8 terminals from 8 different eyes from N=8 mice. D. Box plots and individual paired values (color coded) of the normalized response onsets in Terminal B following the activatiuoTerminal A (before and after incubation with TNFα and IL-1β. The response onsets in Terminal B were normalized to (subtracted from) the corresponding response onsets in Terminal A . Paired t -test; n = 8 terminals from 8 different eyes from N=8 mice. Discussion The expansion of hyperalgesia and inflammation beyond the immediate injured area is well-described 39 . The axon reflex - an antidromic propagation of the APs along non-activated branches of the nociceptor that triggers the release of active substances from nociceptor neurons affecting sensory and immune systems - is thought to be responsible for this expansion 15 , 20 . However, although the axon reflex was predicted about 120 years ago 21 , antidromic propagation along a single nociceptive tree has not been demonstrated. Several alternative and additional mechanisms to explain the expansion of hyperalgesia and inflammation were suggested, including the activation of other nociceptor neurons via ephaptic connections between activated and non-activated axons and communication at the level of the sensory ganglion or dorsal horn via dorsal root reflexes 1 , 8 . Here, we utilized in vivo imaging from individual capsaicin-sensitive nociceptor terminals branching from the same terminal fiber and showed that a single activation of one nociceptor terminal with a short-lasting (1 s) application of noxious stimulus is sufficient to trigger an increase in calcium in a remote non-activated terminal of the same nociceptor neuron ( Figure 6A , left ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 6. Scheme summarizing nociceptor axon reflex in normal and pathological conditions (A) and its potential implications on the expansion of hyperalgesia and neurogenic inflammation (B-C). A. Left, Activation of a specific nociceptor terminal (1) leads to the generation of APs (2), which propagates (3) both orthodromically ( orange arrow ) towards the CNS (“activated” green lightbulb) and antidromically ( blue arrow ) towards remote non-activated terminals of the same terminal tree. There, APs lead to an increase in intra-terminal calcium (4) via the activation of VGCC. Right , the antidromic signaling increases in inflammatory conditions, leading to an increased calcium signal at the remote terminal. The terminals of the nociceptors that innervate different receptive fields, which were not exposed to noxious stimuli, remained unactivated (grey lightbulb) . B , Left , In normal conditions, an axon reflex-induced increase in the intra-terminal calcium in remote terminals of peptidergic nociceptors triggers the release of various proinflammatory mediators ( red-shaded cloud ) that disperse around the remote terminal, resulting in neurogenic inflammation. Right , the inflammation leads to hyperexcitability of the activated terminal (“hyperactivated,” yellow lightbulb ), also resulting in the inflammation-induced increase in intra-terminal calcium, which could result in the enhanced release of proinflammatory mediators, possibly reaching and affecting unactivated terminals of the nociceptors, innervating different receptive fields ( green lightbulb ), thus leading to the extension of hyperalgesia. C. Inflammation triggers structural changes in the nociceptor terminals 4 , characterized by the elongation of the individual terminal branches, thus increasing the possibility of activating the adjacent nociceptor fibers. Our data suggest that this “remotely activated” calcium increase is mediated by the activation of VGCC following Na V -induced AP firing that propagates from an activated terminal. It has been demonstrated that the release of mediators from nociceptor terminals depends on calcium entry via VGCC 31 , which initiates the SNARE-dependent release of neuropeptides 30 , 32 . Given that our study focused exclusively on capsaicin-sensitive (TRPV1-expressing) neurons, which are primarily peptidergic 40 , it is reasonable to suggest that VGCC-dependent calcium increase in the remote terminal we described here may trigger the release of nociceptive mediators 41 ( Figure 6B , left ). Importantly, we demonstrated that under inflammatory conditions sufficient to produce hyperalgesia, activating the nociceptor terminal leads to an enhanced calcium increase in the remote terminal ( Figure 6A , right ). In theory, this increased activation could, in turn, result in an increased release of mediators from the remote terminal ( Figure 6B , right ), leading to their extensive spillover and further increasing neurogenic inflammation. Additionally, the released mediators can reach terminals of nociceptors and other sensory fibers innervating adjacent areas ( Figure 6B , right ), increasing their excitability 9 , 12 , 13 , thus leading to the expansion of hyperalgesia beyond the injured area. Recent reports of inflammation-induced increases in nociceptor terminal branching and the length of each terminal branch 4 , together with the enhanced efferent release of nociceptive mediators from the terminal branches, may further contribute to the expansion of their effects on more expansive areas ( Figure 6C ). Our previous results demonstrated that the nociceptive terminal is composed of two compartments: the “Na V -less” compartment, devoid of functional Na V s in which the signals propagate passively, and the axonal or “propagation” compartment, where Na V s are functionally available and signals propagate in the form of AP 29 , 34 . At the border between these two compartments, about 25 μm from the terminal tip, the spike initiation zone (SIZ, the area where AP is generated) is located 29 . Thus, APs invading the remote terminals would not regenerate after reaching the SIZ (because there are no functionally available Na V s from the SIZ until the tip), and the depolarization would decay as it passively propagates further towards the terminal tip ( Figure 4B ). This decay may result from the small diameter of the terminal branch and intra-terminal mitochondria 42 – 44 , which increases terminal axial resistance and decreases the length constant 2 . This voltage decay could affect the activation of VGCC and, consequently, the release of the nociceptive mediators. In inflammatory conditions and, in particular, following the treatment with TNFα and IL-1β, the increase in the responsiveness of the nociceptive terminals was attributed to the increase in the availability of the Na V s at the terminals, leading to a shift of the SIZ towards the terminal tip 29 . Assuming that during inflammation, the shift in SIZ and the increase of the available Na V s along the terminal tip occurs in all terminal branches, AP that propagates autonomically could invade the remote terminal closer to the terminal tip, leading to a smaller decay of the depolarization reaching the tip, as our computational model predicts ( Figure 4C ). This could be one of the reasons for the inflammation-induced increase in calcium signaling in remote terminals. Our data, which demonstrate a decrease in the onset time of the response of the remote terminal following the application of capsaicin on the activated terminal in the inflammatory conditions, also support this hypothesis. We demonstrated that the axon reflex appears only in 50% of the remote terminals. This is puzzling, considering our data showing AP-mediated propagation between activated and remote terminals, which implies that the signal will not decay on its way to the remote terminal. However, as shown in Figure 4 and discussed above, the signal decays along with the passive Na V -less part of the terminal. The axial resistance of this part may vary among different terminals due to the differences in terminal diameter and number of intra-terminal mitochondria 42 – 44 . Thus, in the terminals with smaller diameters or larger amounts of intra-terminal mitochondria, the voltage decay between the “propagation” part and the passive terminal tip could be strong enough to prevent the activation of VGCC, thus precluding calcium increase in the remote terminals. Another possibility is that in some cases, capsaicin-mediated calcium influx induced by activation of TRPV1 and VGCC in Terminal A fails to generate APs at the Terminal A SIZs. Our experiments demonstrating calcium increase in the remote terminals following the application of capsaicin on the activated terminal show the efferent signaling in nociceptor terminals; however, they do not directly prove that this signaling resulted from the antidromic AP propagation. Our computational data predicts the ortho-to-antidromic AP propagation at the level of the branches of the terminal tree (see also Barlai et al. 2 ). We previously demonstrated that applying Na V blocker oxybuprocaine prevents the increase in calcium in the terminal fibers proximally to the SIZ 29 , suggesting the propagation beyond this point is AP-dependent. Together with the data showing that a blockade of Na V prevents efferent signaling, it suggests local antidromic AP transmission towards non-activated terminals. However, recent findings demonstrating that nociceptive neurons have an axon initial segment (AIS) near their somata 45 may suggest that the efferent signaling we observe in vivo may also occur following AP propagating orthodromically and generating AP at the somatic AIS, which then propagates antidromically, activating the terminals of the same nociceptor neuron. We show that applying noxious stimuli on a nociceptor terminal evokes calcium signals in the remote terminals that depend on the activation of N-, L-, and/or T-type VGCC. We previously demonstrated that functional L-, T-, or N-type VGCC are expressed at the terminal tip 29 . Blockade of N-and L-type VGCC has been shown to prevent the electrical stimulus-evoked increase in CGRP in the skin in vitro , suggesting the involvement of these channels in neuropeptide release 31 . T-type VGCC that is expressed by nociceptor peripheral terminal processes 37 , 46 was also related to the evoked release of CGRP from nociceptor neurons 47 . Altogether, these results suggest that L-, N- and T-type-mediated calcium increase following efferent signaling could trigger the release of nociceptive mediators from the remote terminals. It is widely accepted that inflammation increases nociceptor excitability 5 , 48 – 50 , leading to enhanced responses of the nociceptor terminals to the noxious stimuli 29 , plausibly increasing antidromic propagation and consequently efferent signaling. We modeled inflammatory conditions in vivo by treating cornea with a combination of proinflammatory cytokines TNFα and IL-1β, which, as we and others previously demonstrated, are released during inflammation 51 – 55 and acutely increase AP firing in nociceptor neurons 56 – 58 . Moreover, we showed that the short-lasting application of TNFα and IL-1β on mouse cornea in vivo increases the capsaicin-induced calcium response in nociceptive terminals 29 . However, treating corneas with TNFα and IL-1β does not fully recapitulate the inflammatory state. We used this approach, despite its limitation, because it allowed us to directly compare the changes in the efferent signaling in the same terminal before and after the induction of the acute inflammation. Our data demonstrating that similar short-lasting TNFα and IL-1β treatment that led to an increase in efferent signaling was sufficient to induce corneal hyperalgesia partly overcame the limitation of the model. However, we cannot exclude that the alterations of the efferent signaling in the “natural” inflammatory state could differ from those following exposure to proinflammatory cytokines. In summary, our results provide evidence for the existence of the axon reflex at the level of individual nociceptor terminal trees and its enhancement in inflammatory conditions. We show that acute activation of the nociceptor terminal triggers calcium elevation at the remote, non-activated terminals, which, if sufficient, could induce the release of nociceptor mediators. The calcium elevation and plausibly mediator release is increased in inflammatory conditions. Considering the role of the release of nociceptor mediators in migraine, inflammation, and coordinated integration with the immune cells, our results may advance our understanding of the mechanistic and temporal aspects of these interactions, providing a basis for better therapies for pain, inflammation, and immunopathologies. Resource Availability All data needed to evaluate the conclusions are presented in the paper. All the data and the materials are fully available upon request from the lead contact. All model parameters and the complete code used for simulation are available on the ModelDB repository (Accession: 266850). Author Contributions Conceptualization, A.B.; Investigation, D.G., O.B., N.E. and S.L.; Formal Analysis, D.G., O.B., N.E., B.K., S.L. and A.B.; Writing – Original Draft, A.B.; Writing – Review & Editing, B.K., and A.B.; Funding Acquisition, A.B.; Supervision, A.B. Declaration of interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Metherials and Methods Animals Adult (4-6 weeks, 20-25 gr) male C57BL/C mice were used, and all procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hebrew University (Ethic protocol number MD-21-16546-4 and MD-18-15608) in accordance with the institutional and national guidelines and regulations. Animals were housed in a specific pathogen-free (SPF) environment in standard husbandry and housing conditions, according to the regulations of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem Authority of Biological and Biomedical Models. Specifically, animals were housed in groups under a controlled temperature (23 ± 2°C) and humidity-controlled environment, with ad libitum access to food and water. Animals were kept in a 12-h light/dark cycle in standard cages with bedding and environment enrichment. Animals were randomly allocated and assigned to experimental groups. Viral vectors Adeno-Associated Virus serotype 1 (AAV1) pENN.AAV.hSyn.TurboRFP.WPRE.RBG deposited by James M. Wilson (Addgene plasmid # 105552; http://n2t.net/addgene:105552 ; RRID: Addgene_105552) expressing a TurboRFP gene, and Adeno-Associated Virus serotype 1 (AAV1) pAAV.Syn.GCaMP6s.WPRE.SV40 deposited by Douglas Kim & GENIE Project (Addgene plasmid # 100843; http://n2t.net/addgene:100843 ; RRID: Addgene_100843) expressing a calcium sensor GCaMP6, were ordered from Addgene, delivered on dry ice, and stored at –80°C. A mixture of the two viruses at a ratio of 1:3 of RFP to GCaMP6s (both with a titer of ≥ 1×10¹³ vg/mL) was made and aliquoted for a working solution of 9 µl. Viral injection The expression of the calcium and RFP indicators at the corneal terminals was achieved by viral infection of the trigeminal ganglion (TG) cell bodies via stereotaxic injection to the V1 area as we previously detailed 29 , 59 . In short, an adult mouse was anesthetized by intraperitoneal (IP) injection of 100 µl of prepared anesthesia mixture containing ketamine (1 gr/10 ml) and medetomidine (1 mg/ml) diluted in saline (NaCl 0.9%) up to 10 ml, to final concentrations of 10 mg/ml ketamine and 80 µg/ml medetomidine. For pain relief, meloxicam (5 mg/ml) was injected subcutaneously at a concentration of 1.32-1.65 mg/kg. The mouse’s scalp was shaved, and the mouse was placed in the stereotactic frame on a heating pad set at 37°C. The mouse was anesthetized using an isoflurane vaporizer (0.4%-0.6%) connected via a nose cone. 2% of isoflurane was set for anesthesia induction, and 0.4-0.6% was used to maintain the anesthesia during the procedure. Animals were monitored for pain reflexes using the paw pinch method. When reflexes were abolished, the animal’s head was stabilized using non-rupture ear bars, and depilatory cream was applied to remove the remaining fur after shaving. The scalp was cleaned using saline and 70% ethanol, followed by applying 10% povidone-iodine. A midline incision of about 1 cm was made to expose the skull to visualize Bregma and Lambda focal points used for coordinates determination. The coordinates for cranial drilling allowing the viral injection into the V1 area of the two trigeminal ganglions (TGs) were adopted from Whitehead et al. 60 : on the mediolateral axis, two holes (approximately 0.5 mm diameter) were drilled according to the following coordinates: +0.4 mm ± 0.02 mm to Bregma, on the anterior-posterior axis, and +/–1.35 ± 0.02 mm to Bregma on the mediolateral axis. After drilling a hole, the dental drill was replaced with a pipette holder for the viral injections. A calibrated 1-5 μl glass pipette loaded with the viral mixture of RFP and GCaMP6 was mounted into the holder. 1-2 μl of the viral mixture was injected per ganglion at a rate of about 1 µl/10 s. After injection of the virus, the incision was closed using a suture thread, and the animal was injected IP with atipamezole (5 mg/ml) diluted in saline to a final concentration of 1-1.25 mg/kg for anesthesia reversal. The calcium imaging experiments from the terminals of corneal nociceptive nerve endings were performed 10 - 14 days after the injections. In vivo calcium imaging of corneal nociceptive terminals Experimental design For a step-by-step explanation of the in vivo calcium imaging from corneal nociceptive terminals, please refer to Gershon et al. 59 The signal propagation between the activated terminal (Terminal A ) and the remote, non-activated terminal (Terminal B ) of the same corneal nociceptive terminal tree was assessed using the following approach ( Figure 1A ): mice infected with calcium (GCaMP6s) and fluorescent (RFP) indicators (see above Virus injection section) were anesthetized with a combination of ketamine and medetomidine by IP injection and placed on a plate with a heating pad set to 37°C. We used ketamine (1 gr/10 ml) and medetomidine (1 mg/ml) diluted in saline (NaCl 0.9%) up to 10 ml, to final concentrations of 10 mg/ml ketamine and 80 µg/ml medetomidine. When the paw pinch reflex was abolished, the head was fixed with a three-point head stabilizer (SGM-4, Narishige, Japan). A custom-made eye stabilizer and bath was used to stabilize the eyeball and filled with standard extracellular solution (SES) composed of (in mM): 145 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl 2 , 1 mM MgCl 2 , 10 mM glucose, and 10 mM HEPES. The eye bath was held by a hemostat fixed to a Noga arm. The plate was placed on the microscope stage. Using RFP fluorescence (see below Optics and fluorescence section for the parameters), a superficial (less than 5 μm from the epithelial surface) ramified nociceptive terminal was selected (Terminal A ), and its coordinates were stored. Then, by shifting the microscope lens, its bifurcations were followed until a distant superficial terminal belonging to the same tree was located (Terminal B ). A minimal distance of 200 μm between Terminal A and Terminal B were kept to avoid the effect of capsaicin spillover. The experiment began by activating Terminal A with a calibrated capsaicin puff application (see below, Terminal activation section). Wide-field epifluorescence and calcium imaging recordings were performed to record the induced calcium signals at the Terminal A 2-10 μm proximal to the terminal tip 59 . Then, the lens was moved and refocused on Terminal B , but the puff pipette was kept at the same position adjacent to Terminal A . Five minutes after the recording from Terminal A , a second puff application to Terminal A with the same parameters was given, but the calcium responses were recorded from Terminal B ( Figure 1A-C ). We previously demonstrated that the 5-minute interval between the stimulations allows a full recovery of the terminal from desensitization 29 . Only the experiments showing a successful Terminal B activation were taken for the analysis. Optics and fluorescence parameters Wide-field epifluorescence and calcium dynamics imaging were performed using an Olympus BX51WI microscope with an x40 LUMPlanFL objective and an NA of 0.8. An Exi Aqua monochromatic camera (QImaging) was used for wide-field epifluorescence image acquisition controlled by NIS Elements AR software Version 4.20.02, Nikon software. The RFP fluorescence imaging was performed using an exposure time of 300-500 ms, binning 2X2, hardware gain of 10-20, and a maximal power light source with 3.1 mW/cm 2 flux at the focal plane of the objective. A back-illuminated 80 X 80 pixel cooled CCD camera (NeuroCCD-SMQ, RedShirt Imaging) was used for fast optical recording of changes in GCaMP6s fluorescent intensity, set at a 40-125 Hz acquisition rate and medium gain. Fluorescent excitation was performed with a CoolLed fluorescence excitation system. For RFP, a 565 nm excitation LED and RFP filter set (Ex 560, Em 630, dichroic Lp 585; Chroma) were used. For GCaMP6s, a 490 nm excitation LED (maximal power light source with 5.4 mW/cm 2 flux at the focal plane of the objective) and GFP filter set (Ex 480, Em 535, dichroic Lp 510; Chroma) were used. The ROIs were visualized using a NeuroCCD-SMQ camera and Turbo-SM recording software. Turbo-SM via the RedShirt camera’s analog-to-digital (A/D) converter, triggering a Digidata 1440 A/D interface (Molecular devices), which in turn triggers the picospritzer (Pneumatic PicoPump) was used to initiate the puff and start the Redshirt camera recordings. The experimental parameters were set using the pClamp software (Molecular Devices). These parameters have been devised after calibrating the dispersion profile of the puffed solution (Goldstein et al., 2017), preventing an effect on neighboring terminals. The experimental protocol was as follows: 1000 ms recording before puff application, 1000 ms puff duration (2 pounds per square inch (psi)), and a 5500 ms recording following the puff. Image data collected from the RedShirt camera was further processed and analyzed from selected ROIs (defined with a kernel size of two (2X2 pixels) using NeuroPlex 10.2.0, MATLAB software (Mathworks, version R2016a), and OriginPro 2020 (OriginLab Corporation). Using the NeuroPlex program provided by RedShirt, the raw files of the ROI fluorescent intensities recorded were assessed. The data was further analyzed by MATLAB, the fluorescent traces were normalized to baseline fluorescent intensities (I 0 ), and the changes in the peak fluorescence intensity (I/I 0 ) and signal time onset (in ms) were calculated 29 , 59 . Terminal activation The recordings from Terminal A and Terminal B were performed following a focal activation of Terminal A by capsaicin puff. To that end, a pulled glass pipette (see 59 for specifications) was filled with a solution of SES, capsaicin (500 nM) and sulfa-rhodamine 101 (SR101, 9 μM) (4-6 MΩ resistance) and was placed in the Picospritzer holder adapter on the micromanipulator (SM7) (UNIT Junior RE, Luigs & Neumann). The loaded pipette tip was positioned adjacent to the terminal of interest, 2-5 μm above the corneal surface (without disturbing the cell layer), and approximately 10 μm in the x-y plane from the terminal end, and 1 s puff was applied 29 , 59 . To examine the effect of voltage-gated sodium channels (Na V ) blockade on efferent signaling, a 10μl drop containing 0.4% oxybuprocaine in standard external solution (SES) was applied to the eye bath for 2 min, and the responses to capsaicin were recorded. Afterward, the solution was washed out and replaced with SES. 60 min later, the effects of washing out oxybuprocaine were assessed. Only terminals showing successful Terminal B activation before the application of oxybuprocaine were taken for the analysis. To examine the effect of voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCC) blockade on efferent signaling, the efferent signaling was measured before and after 60 min pretreatment with 50 μM of the L-N- and T-type VGCC blocker benidipine (Alomone, Israel). A 10 mM stock solution was made up of ethanol and diluted to 50 μM in SES for working bath application. Only terminals showing successful Terminal B activation before the application of benidipine were taken for the analysis. Induction of corneal inflammation in vivo Corneal inflammation was induced using a 10μl drop containing 100ng/ml of TNFα and 100pg/ml of IL-1β in SES applied to the eye every 5 min for a total duration of 30 min. Subsequently, the solution was washed out and replaced with SES for imaging. Calcium imaging of the same terminal was performed before and after the inflammation. Behavioral experiments To ensure that the application of 100ng/ml of TNFα and 100pg/ml of IL-1β produces hyperalgesia, capsaicin-induced nocifensive behavior was analyzed using the forelimb eye wiping test as described previously 4 , 59 , 61 . Briefly, 6 male C57BL/6 mice (6-8 weeks old) were used in each experimental group. Before all experiments, mice were handled and habituated to the experimental procedures and testing environment for 4 days. The behavioral assays were performed in custom Perspex glass cages. The mice were habituated to the setup for 10 minutes before each assay, and then baseline eye-wiping behavior was recorded for 5 minutes. Following this, the animals were divided into experimental groups. The mice in the “Inflammation” group were anesthetized using isoflurane, and then a 10μl drop containing 100ng/ml of TNFα and 100pg/ml of IL-1β in standard external solution (SES) was applied to the right eye every 5 min for a total duration of 30 min. After 30 min, the animals were removed from anesthesia, and the behavioral essay began. The animals in the “Vehicle” group underwent the same procedure, but only SES was applied. The SES consisted (in mM): 145 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl 2 , 1 mM MgCl 2 , 10 mM glucose, and 10 mM HEPES. Each assay involved applying a 10μl drop containing 1μM capsaicin on the right eye of the mouse. Five minutes after application, the eye-wiping behavior was recorded and then analyzed post-hoc. Computational model The model was built based on a published, open-source biophysical model of unmyelinated axons in DRG neurons 2 , 4 , 29 . The model files are accessible in the ModelDB repository (Accession: 266850). Simulations were conducted using the NEURON simulation environment. The nociceptor morphology included a soma-like compartment with a 25 μm diameter connected to a stem axon that branched into central and peripheral axons meeting at a T-junction. Branch diameters were 0.25 μm. Passive Membrane Properties Intrinsic membrane properties were adapted from Barkai et al. 2 . A passive membrane resistance of 10,000 Ω·cm² was applied to all compartments except the terminal branch. Axial resistance was set to 150 Ω·cm for all compartments except the terminal branch, which exhibited a 4-fold somatic membrane resistance. The membrane capacitance for all compartments was 1 μF·cm², and the passive reversal potential (EPas) was set to −60 mV. Active Conductances The model incorporated several active conductances, including TTX-sensitive sodium currents (INaTTXS), TTX-sensitive persistent sodium currents (INaP), Nav1.9 TTX-resistant sodium channels (INav1.9), and Nav1.8 TTX-resistant sodium channels (INav1.8). Parameters for these sodium channels were adapted from Herzog et al. and Baker et al. 62 , 63 . Three potassium channel types were included: (i) the delayed rectifier potassium channel (IKDR), adapted from Herzog et al. 62 ; (ii) an A-type potassium channel (IKA) based on Miyasho et al. 64 with activation and inactivation gates shifted by 20 mV in the hyperpolarized direction to match DRG neuron kinetics 65 ; and (iii) Kv7/M channels adapted from Shah et al. 66 with activation curve parameters tuned as in Barkai et al. 67 . The h-current (Ih) was included based on Shah et al. (Shah et al., 2002), with the slope factor adjusted according to Komagiri and Kitamura 68 . T-type (ICaT) and L-type (ICaL) calcium channels represented low voltage-activated (LVA) and high voltage-activated (HVA) currents, respectively. Unless otherwise noted, specific channel conductances (g) were as published previously 2–4: g Nav1.8 = 0.02 S/cm 2 , g Nav1.9 = 0.00064 S/cm 2 , g NaTTXS = 0.0017 S/cm 2 , g NaP = 0.00005 S/cm 2 , g KDR = 0.00083 S/cm 2 , g KA = 0.0015 S/cm 2 , g Kv7/M = 0.00034 S/cm 2 , g H = 0.00033 S/cm 2 , g CaL = 0.003 S/cm 2 , g CaT = 0.001 S/cm 2 . Reversal Potentials The reversal potentials for sodium (ENa), potassium (EK), and the h (EH) currents were set as follows: ENa = 60 mV, EK = −85 mV, and EH = −20 mV. Sodium conductances were unevenly distributed, localized primarily in conductive compartments, while other conductances were uniformly distributed across all compartments. Based on our previous findings, the terminal branches were divided into two sections separated by the spike initiation zone (SIZ) 29 . The SIZ consisted of a 25 μm-long compartment completely devoid of sodium conductances (Nav-less compartment). This Nav-less compartment was connected to the rest of the terminal branch via the "propagation" compartment, which bridged it to the junction 2 , 29 . Nerve-Ending Stimulation Capsaicin-like stimulation was modeled and applied as in previous studies 2 – 4 , 29 , 67 . A capsaicin-like current was introduced through a simplified voltage-clamp point process with fast exponential activation and slow exponential inactivation. The modeled capsaicin-like current mimicked the experimental kinetics of puff-applied 1 μM capsaicin-induced currents, sufficient to induce action potential (AP) firing in acutely dissociated DRG neurons 69 . The axial resistance (Ra) of the terminal was increased by x15 relative to the distal axon Ra to simulate the localization of intracellular organelles in the free-ending terminal branches 2 , 44 , 70 . Transducer channel conductance was introduced into the stimulated nerve endings to simulate the activation of transducer channels during capsaicin stimulation 2 . The conductance followed an exponential distribution, with the decay constant (γ) calculated to reflect capsaicin diffusion and concentration changes as a function of distance from the pipette tip, as determined in earlier work 29 . Recordings were conducted by positioning a NEURON "point-process" electrode at the terminal end of the central axon 2 , 67 . To simulate the inflammatory conditions, the location of SIZ was shifted towards the terminal tip by shortening the Nav-less compartment by 15 μm, such that the SIZ was located 10 μm from the terminal tip 29 . Statistical analysis Data from the individual terminals is presented for each data set. We used one terminal set (Terminal A and Terminal B ) per mouse so that each data point represented individual mice. Due to possible variance in fluorescent intensities at different focal planes, only the values acquired at the same focal plane at the same ROI were compared. Fluorescent intensities were normalized to the first puff activation, and only paired statistical analysis was used to compare the fluorescent intensities at the same ROI before and after treatment. Because all the values were normalized to the values before treatment, a one-sample t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test (when the values were not normally distributed) was used. To analyze the changes in response onsets between Terminal A and Terminal B, the unnormalized values were compared using paired t -test. The normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. For the behavioral experiments, ordinary one-way ANOVA with posthoc Bonferroni was used. Actual p values are presented for each data set. The criterion for statistical significance was p < 0.05. Boxplots presented in the figures depict the Means or Medians (when the values were not normally distributed), 25th; 75th percentile, and 1.5 SD. Acknowledgments This work was funded by: The Israel Science Foundation – Individual research grant 1202/23 (AB), Israel Cancer Research Fund (ICRF) – The Brause Family Initiative for Quality of Life 22-402-QOL (AB), The Israel Science Foundation (ISF) and the Azrieli Foundation - 2545/18 (AB), and Cecile and Seymour Alpert Chair in Pain Research (AB). References 1. ↵ Carlton , S.M . ( 2014 ). Nociceptive primary afferents: They have a mind of their own . Journal of Physiology 592 , 3403 – 3411 . doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.269654 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 2. ↵ Barkai , O. , Butterman , R. , Katz , B. , Lev , S. , and Binshtok , A.M . ( 2020 ). The input-output relation of primary nociceptive neurons is determined by the morphology of the peripheral nociceptive terminals . J Neurosci 28 , 1520 – 1546 . OpenUrl 3. Dey , S. , Barkai , O. , Gokhman , I. , Suissa , S. , Haffner-Krausz , R. , Wigoda , N. , Feldmesser , E. , Ben-Dor , S. , Kovalenko , A. , Binshtok , A. , et al. ( 2023 ). Kinesin family member 2A gates nociception . Cell Rep 42 , 113257 . doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113257 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 4. ↵ Wong , C. , Barkai , O. , Wang , F. , Thörn Pérez , C. , Lev , S. , Cai , W. , Tansley , S. , Yousefpour , N. , Hooshmandi , M. , Lister , K.C. , et al. ( 2022 ). mTORC2 mediates structural plasticity in distal nociceptive endings that contributes to pain hypersensitivity following inflammation . Journal of Clinical Investigation . doi: 10.1172/JCI152635 . OpenUrl CrossRef 5. ↵ Gold , M.S. , and Gebhart , G.F . ( 2010 ). Nociceptor sensitization in pain pathogenesis . Nat Med 16 , 1248 – 1257 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 6. ↵ Li , X. , Prudente , A.S. , Prato , V. , Guo , X. , Hao , H. , Jones , F. , Figoli , S. , Mullen , P. , Wang , Y. , Tonello , R. , et al. ( 2024 ). Peripheral gating of mechanosensation by glial diazepam binding inhibitor . Journal of Clinical Investigation 134 . doi: 10.1172/JCI176227 . OpenUrl CrossRef 7. ↵ Du , X. , Hao , H. , Yang , Y. , Huang , S. , Wang , C. , Gigout , S. , Ramli , R. , Li , X. , Jaworska , E. , Edwards , I. , et al. ( 2017 ). Local GABAergic signaling within sensory ganglia controls peripheral nociceptive transmission . J Clin Invest 127 , 1741 – 1756 . doi: 10.1172/jci86812 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 8. ↵ Sorkin , L.S. , Eddinger , K.A. , Woller , S.A. , and Yaksh , T.L . ( 2018 ). Origins of antidromic activity in sensory afferent fibers and neurogenic inflammation . Semin Immunopathol 40 , 237 – 247 . doi: 10.1007/s00281-017-0669-2 . OpenUrl CrossRef 9. ↵ 9. Natura, G., von Banchet, G.S., and Schaible, H.-G. ( 2005 ). Calcitonin gene-related peptide enhances TTX-resistant sodium currents in cultured dorsal root ganglion neurons from adult rats . Pain 116 , 194 – 204 . doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.04.002 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 10. 10. Sculptoreanu, A., and de Groat, W.C. ( 2003 ). Protein Kinase C Is Involved in Neurokinin Receptor Modulation of N- and L-Type Ca Channels in DRG Neurons of the Adult Rat . J Neurophysiol 90 , 21 – 31 . doi: 10.1152/jn.00108.2003 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 11. Cang , C.-L. , Zhang , H. , Zhang , Y.-Q. , and Zhao , Z.-Q . ( 2009 ). PKC∊-Dependent Potentiation of TTX-Resistant Na V 1.8 Current by Neurokinin-1 Receptor Activation in Rat Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons . Mol Pain 5 . doi: 10.1186/1744-8069-5-33 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 12. ↵ Zhang , H. , Cang , C.-L. , Kawasaki , Y. , Liang , L.-L. , Zhang , Y.-Q. , Ji , R.-R. , and Zhao , Z.-Q . ( 2007 ). Neurokinin-1 Receptor Enhances TRPV1 Activity in Primary Sensory Neurons via PKCε: A Novel Pathway for Heat Hyperalgesia . The Journal of Neuroscience 27 , 12067 – 12077 . doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0496-07.2007 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 13. ↵ Du , J. , Koltzenburg , M. , and Carlton , S.M . ( 2001 ). Glutamate-induced excitation and sensitization of nociceptors in rat glabrous skin . Pain 89 , 187 – 198 . doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00362-6 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 14. ↵ Sahbaie , P. , Shi , X. , Guo , T.-Z. , Qiao , Y. , Yeomans , D.C. , Kingery , W.S. , and Clark , D.J . ( 2009 ). Role of substance P signaling in enhanced nociceptive sensitization and local cytokine production after incision . Pain 145 , 341 – 349 . doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.06.037 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 15. ↵ Cohen , J.A. , Edwards , T.N. , Liu , A.W. , Hirai , T. , Jones , M.R. , Wu , J. , Li , Y. , Zhang , S. , Ho , J. , Davis , B.M. , et al. ( 2019 ). Cutaneous TRPV1+ Neurons Trigger Protective Innate Type 17 Anticipatory Immunity . Cell 178 , 919 – 932 .e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.022 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 16. Perner , C. , Flayer , C.H. , Zhu , X. , Aderhold , P.A. , Dewan , Z.N.A. , Voisin , T. , Camire , R.B. , Chow , O.A. , Chiu , I.M. , and Sokol , C.L . ( 2020 ). Substance P Release by Sensory Neurons Triggers Dendritic Cell Migration and Initiates the Type-2 Immune Response to Allergens . Immunity 53 , 1063 – 1077 .e7. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.10.001 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 17. 17. Chiu, I.M., Heesters, B.A., Ghasemlou, N., von Hehn, C.A., Zhao, F., Tran, J., Wainger, B., Strominger, A., Muralidharan, S., Horswill, A.R., et al. ( 2013 ). Bacteria activate sensory neurons that modulate pain and inflammation . Nature 501 , 52 – 57 . doi: 10.1038/nature12479 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 18. Sann , H. , and Pierau , F . ( 1998 ). Efferent functions of C-fiber nociceptors . Z Rheumatol 57 , 2 – 8 . OpenUrl 19. Yang , H. , Zeng , Q. , Silverman , H.A. , Gunasekaran , M. , George , S.J. , Devarajan , A. , Addorisio , M.E. , Li , J. , Tsaava , T. , Shah , V. , et al. ( 2021 ). HMGB1 released from nociceptors mediates inflammation . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 . doi: 10.1073/pnas.2102034118 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 20. ↵ 20. Chiu, I.M., Von Hehn, C.A., and Woolf, C.J. ( 2012 ). Neurogenic inflammation and the peripheral nervous system in host defense and immunopathology . Nat Neurosci 15 , 1063 – 1067 . doi: 10.1038/nn.3144 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 21. ↵ Bayliss , W.M . ( 1901 ). On the origin from the spinal cord of the vaso-dilator fibres of the hind-limb, and on the nature of these fibres . J Physiol 26 , 173 – 209 . doi: 10.1113/JPHYSIOL.1901.SP000831 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 22. ↵ Ashina , M . ( 2020 ). Migraine . New England Journal of Medicine 383 , 1866 – 1876 . doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1915327 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 23. ↵ Zhang , W. , Lyu , M. , Bessman , N.J. , Xie , Z. , Arifuzzaman , M. , Yano , H. , Parkhurst , C.N. , Chu , C. , Zhou , L. , Putzel , G.G. , et al. ( 2022 ). Gut-innervating nociceptors regulate the intestinal microbiota to promote tissue protection . Cell 185 , 4170 – 4189 .e20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.008 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 24. Lai , N.Y. , Musser , M.A. , Pinho-Ribeiro , F.A. , Baral , P. , Jacobson , A. , Ma , P. , Potts , D.E. , Chen , Z. , Paik , D. , Soualhi , S. , et al. ( 2020 ). Gut-Innervating Nociceptor Neurons Regulate Peyer’s Patch Microfold Cells and SFB Levels to Mediate Salmonella Host Defense . Cell 180 , 33 – 49 .e22. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.014 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 25. Talbot , S. , Abdulnour , R.E.E. , Burkett , P.R. , Lee , S. , Cronin , S.J.F. , Pascal , M.A. , Laedermann , C. , Foster , S.L. , Tran , J. V. , Lai , N. , et al. ( 2015 ). Silencing Nociceptor Neurons Reduces Allergic Airway Inflammation . Neuron 87 , 341 – 354 . doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.06.007 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 26. Pinho-Ribeiro , F.A. , Deng , L. , Neel , D. V. , Erdogan , O. , Basu , H. , Yang , D. , Choi , S. , Walker , A.J. , Carneiro-Nascimento , S. , He , K. , et al. ( 2023 ). Bacteria hijack a meningeal neuroimmune axis to facilitate brain invasion . Nature . doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05753-x . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 27. ↵ Ben-Shaanan , T.L. , Knöpper , K. , Duan , L. , Liu , R. , Taglinao , H. , Xu , Y. , An , J. , Plikus , M. V. , and Cyster , J.G . ( 2024 ). Dermal TRPV1 innervations engage a macrophage- and fibroblast-containing pathway to activate hair growth in mice . Dev Cell 59 , 2818 – 2833 .e7. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2024.05.019 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 28. ↵ Bouheraoua , N. , Fouquet , S. , Marcos-Almaraz , M.T. , Karagogeos , D. , Laroche , L. , and Chédotal , A . ( 2019 ). Genetic analysis of the organization, development, and plasticity of corneal innervation in mice . Journal of Neuroscience 39 , 1150 – 1168 . doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1401-18.2018 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 29. ↵ Goldstein , R.H. , Barkai , O. , Íñigo-Portugués , A. , Katz , B. , Lev , S. , and Binshtok , A.M . ( 2019 ). Location and Plasticity of the Sodium Spike Initiation Zone in Nociceptive Terminals In Vivo . Neuron 102 , 801 – 812 .e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.03.005 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 30. ↵ Cui , M. , Khanijou , S. , Rubino , J. , and Aoki , K.R . ( 2004 ). Subcutaneous administration of botulinum toxin A reduces formalin-induced pain . Pain 107 , 125 – 133 . doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.10.008 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 31. ↵ Kress , M. , Izydorczyk , I. , and Kuhn , A . ( 2001 ). N- and L-but not P/Q-type calcium channels contribute to neuropeptide release from rat skin in vitro . Neuroreport 12 , 867 – 870 . doi: 10.1097/00001756-200103260-00048 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 32. ↵ Pellett , S. , Yaksh , T.L. , and Ramachandran , R . ( 2015 ). Current status and future directions of botulinum neurotoxins for targeting pain processing . Toxins (Basel ) 7 , 4519 – 4563 . doi: 10.3390/toxins7114519 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 33. ↵ Alamri , A. , Bron , R. , Brock , J.A. , and Ivanusic , J.J . ( 2015 ). Transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1 expressing corneal sensory neurons can be subdivided into at least three subpopulations . Front Neuroanat 9 . doi: 10.3389/fnana.2015.00071 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 34. ↵ Goldstein , R.H. , Katz , B. , Lev , S. , and Binshtok , A.M . ( 2017 ). Ultrafast optical recording reveals distinct capsaicin-induced ion dynamics along single nociceptive neurite terminals in vitro . J Biomed Opt 22 , 76010 . doi: 10.1117/1.jbo.22.7.076010 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 35. ↵ Giudici , V. , Baeza , S. , Douet , J. , and Regnier , A . ( 2015 ). Corneal anesthesia following application of 0.4% oxybuprocaine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution to normal feline eyes . Vet Ophthalmol 18 , 141 – 146 . doi: 10.1111/vop.12179 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 36. ↵ Waxman , S.G. , and Zamponi , G.W . ( 2014 ). Regulating excitability of peripheral afferents: emerging ion channel targets . Nat Neurosci 17 , 153 – 163 . doi: 10.1038/nn.3602 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 37. ↵ Zamponi , G.W. , Lewis , R.J. , Todorovic , S.M. , Arneric , S.P. , and Snutch , T.P . ( 2009 ). Role of voltage-gated calcium channels in ascending pain pathways . Brain Res Rev 60 , 84 – 89 . doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.12.021 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 38. ↵ Yao , K. , Nagashima , K. , and Miki , H . ( 2006 ). Pharmacological, Pharmacokinetic, and Clinical Properties of Benidipine Hydrochloride, a Novel, Long-Acting Calcium Channel Blocker . J Pharmacol Sci 100 , 243 – 261 . doi: 10.1254/jphs.DTJ05001X . OpenUrl CrossRef 39. ↵ Chapman , L.F . ( 1977 ). MECHANISMS OF THE FLARE REACTION IN HUMAN SKIN . Journal of Investigative Dermatology 69 , 88 – 97 . doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12497896 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 40. ↵ Cavanaugh , D.J. , Chesler , A.T. , Bráz , J.M. , Shah , N.M. , Julius , D. , and Basbaum , A.I . ( 2011 ). Restriction of transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 to the peptidergic subset of primary afferent neurons follows its developmental downregulation in nonpeptidergic neurons . J Neurosci 31 , 10119 – 10127 . doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1299-11.2011 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 41. ↵ Flores , C.M. , Leong , A.S. , O. Dussor , G. , Hargreaves , K.M. , and Kilo , S. ( 2001 ). Capsaicin-evoked CGRP release from rat buccal mucosa: development of a model system for studying trigeminal mechanisms of neurogenic inflammation . European Journal of Neuroscience 14 , 1113 – 1120 . doi: 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01736.x . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 42. ↵ Heppelmann , B. , Messlinger , K. , Neiss , W.F. , and Schmidt , R.F . ( 1994 ). Mitochondria in fine afferent nerve fibres of the knee joint in the cat: a quantitative electron-microscopical examination . Cell Tissue Res 275 , 493 – 501 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 43. Heppelmann , B. , Gallar , J. , Trost , B. , Schmidt , R.F. , and Belmonte , C . ( 2001 ). Three-dimensional reconstruction of scleral cold thermoreceptors of the cat eye . J Comp Neurol 441 , 148 – 154 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 44. ↵ Müller , L.J. , Pels , L. , and Vrensen , G.F . ( 1996 ). Ultrastructural organization of human corneal nerves . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 37 , 476 – 488 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 45. ↵ 45. Nascimento AI, Da Silva, T., and Sousa M ( 2022 ). Sensory neurons have an axon initial segment that initiates spontaneous activity in neuropathic pain . Preprint at Oxford University Press , doi: 10.1093/brain/awac156 https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awac156. OpenUrl CrossRef 46. ↵ Rose , K.E. , Lunardi , N. , Boscolo , A. , Dong , X. , Erisir , A. , Jevtovic-Todorovic , V. , and Todorovic , S.M . ( 2013 ). Immunohistological demonstration of CaV3.2 T-type voltage-gated calcium channel expression in soma of dorsal root ganglion neurons and peripheral axons of rat and mouse . Neuroscience 250 , 263 – 274 . doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.07.005 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 47. ↵ Spitzer , M.J.S. , Reeh , P.W. , and Sauer , S.K . ( 2008 ). Mechanisms of potassium- and capsaicin-induced axonal calcitonin gene-related peptide release: Involvement of L- and T-type calcium channels and TRPV1 but not sodium channels . Neuroscience 151 , 836 – 842 . doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.10.030 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 48. ↵ Black , J.A. , Liu , S. , Tanaka , M. , Cummins , T.R. , and Waxman , S.G . ( 2004 ). Changes in the expression of tetrodotoxin-sensitive sodium channels within dorsal root ganglia neurons in inflammatory pain . Pain 108 , 237 – 247 . doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.12.035 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 49. Woolf , C.J. , and Ma , Q . ( 2007 ). Nociceptors--noxious stimulus detectors . Neuron 55 , 353 – 364 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 50. ↵ Barkai , O. , Puig , S. , Lev , S. , Title , B. , Katz , B. , Eli-Berchoer , L. , Gutstein , H.B. , and Binshtok , A.M . ( 2019 ). Platelet-derived growth factor activates nociceptive neurons by inhibiting M-current and contributes to inflammatory pain . Pain 160 , 1281 – 1296 . doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001523 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 51. ↵ Verri Jr ., W.A. , Cunha , T.M. , Parada , C.A. , Poole , S. , Cunha , F.Q. , Ferreira , S.H. , Verri , W.A. , Cunha , T.M. , Parada , C.A. , Poole , S., et al. ( 2006 ). Hypernociceptive role of cytokines and chemokines: targets for analgesic drug development? Pharmacol Ther 112 , 116 – 138 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 52. Safieh-Garabedian , B. , Poole , S. , Allchorne , A. , Winter , J. , and Woolf , C.J . ( 1995 ). Contribution of interleukin-1 beta to the inflammation-induced increase in nerve growth factor levels and inflammatory hyperalgesia . Br J Pharmacol 115 , 1265 – 1275 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 53. Jin , X. , and Gereau, R.W. th ( 2006 ). Acute p38-mediated modulation of tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channels in mouse sensory neurons by tumor necrosis factor-alpha . J Neurosci 26 , 246 – 255 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 54. Teng , M.C. , Wu , P.C. , Lin , S.P. , Wu , C.Y. , Wang , P.H. , Chen , C.T. , and Chen , B.Y . ( 2018 ). Danshensu Decreases UVB-Induced Corneal Inflammation in an Experimental Mouse Model via Oral Administration . Curr Eye Res 43 , 27 – 34 . doi: 10.1080/02713683.2017.1379543 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 55. ↵ Yin , J. , Huang , Z. , Wu , B. , Shi , Y. , Cao , C. , and Lu , Y . ( 2008 ). Lornoxicam protects mouse cornea from UVB-induced damage via inhibition of NF-{kappa}B activation . Br J Ophthalmol 92 , 562 – 568 . doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.129064 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 56. ↵ Binshtok , A.M. , Wang , H. , Zimmermann , K. , Amaya , F. , Vardeh , D. , Shi , L. , Brenner , G.J. , Ji , R.R. , Bean , B.P. , Woolf , C.J. , et al. ( 2008 ). Nociceptors are interleukin-1β sensors . Journal of Neuroscience 28 , 14062 – 14073 . doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3795-08.2008 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 57. Gudes , S. , Barkai , O. , Caspi , Y. , Katz , B. , Lev , S. , and Binshtok , A.M . ( 2015 ). The role of slow and persistent TTX-resistant sodium currents in acute tumor necrosis factor-alpha-mediated increase in nociceptors excitability . J Neurophysiol 113 , 601 – 619 . doi: 10.1152/jn.00652.2014 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 58. ↵ Sorkin , L.S. , Xiao , W.H. , Wagner , R. , and Myers , R.R . ( 1997 ). Tumour necrosis factor-alpha induces ectopic activity in nociceptive primary . Neuroscience 81 , 255 – 262 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 59. ↵ 59. Gershon, D., Negev-Goldstein, R.H., Abd al Razzaq, L., Lev, S., and Binshtok, A.M. ( 2022 ). In vivo optical recordings of ion dynamics in mouse corneal primary nociceptive terminals . STAR Protoc 3 , 101224 . doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101224 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 60. ↵ Whitehead , J.L. , Ohara , P.T. , Tauscher , A.N. , and LaVail , J.H . ( 2003 ). A procedure to deliver herpes simplex virus to the murine trigeminal ganglion . Brain Res Brain Res Protoc 12 , 60 – 66 . doi: 10.1016/S1385-299X(03)00072-2 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 61. ↵ Udasin , R. , Sil , A. , Zomot , E. , Cohen , H.A. , Haj , J. , Engelmayer , N. , Lev , S. , Binshtok , A.M. , Shaked , Y. , Kienzler , M.A. , et al. ( 2022 ). Photopharmacological modulation of native CRAC channels using azoboronate photoswitches . PNAS . doi: 10.1073/pnas . OpenUrl CrossRef 62. ↵ Herzog , R.I. , Cummins , T.R. , and Waxman , S.G . ( 2001 ). Persistent TTX-resistant Na+ current affects resting potential and response to depolarization in simulated spinal sensory neurons . J Neurophysiol 86 , 1351 – 1364 . doi: 10.1152/JN.2001.86.3.1351 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 63. ↵ Baker , M.D . ( 2005 ). Protein kinase C mediates up-regulation of tetrodotoxin-resistant, persistent Na+ current in rat and mouse sensory neurones . J Physiol 567 , 851 – 867 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 64. ↵ Miyasho , T. , Takagi , H. , Suzuki , H. , Watanabe , S. , Inoue , M. , Kudo , Y. , and Miyakawa , H . ( 2001 ). Low-threshold potassium channels and a low-threshold calcium channel regulate Ca2+ spike firing in the dendrites of cerebellar Purkinje neurons: a modeling study . Brain Res 891 , 106 – 115 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 65. ↵ Qu , L. , and Caterina , M.J . ( 2016 ). Enhanced excitability and suppression of A-type K+ currents in joint sensory neurons in a murine model of antigen-induced arthritis . In Sci Rep doi: 10.1038/srep28899 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 66. ↵ Shah , M. , Mistry , M. , Marsh , S.J. , Brown , D.A. , and Delmas , P . ( 2002 ). Molecular correlates of the M-current in cultured rat hippocampal neurons . J Physiol 544 , 29 – 37 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 67. ↵ Barkai , O. , Goldstein , R.H. , Caspi , Y. , Katz , B. , Lev , S. , and Binshtok , A.M . ( 2017 ). The Role of Kv7/M Potassium Channels in Controlling Ectopic Firing in Nociceptors . Front Mol Neurosci 10 , 181 . doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00181 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 68. ↵ Komagiri , Y. , and Kitamura , N . ( 2003 ). Effect of intracellular dialysis of ATP on the hyperpolarization-activated cation current in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons . J Neurophysiol 90 , 2115 – 2122 . doi: 10.1152/jn.00442.2003 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 69. ↵ Vasylyev , D. V , and Waxman , S.G . ( 2012 ). Membrane properties and electrogenesis in the distal axons of small dorsal root ganglion neurons in vitro . J Neurophysiol 108 , 729 – 740 . doi: 10.1152/jn.00091.2012 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 70. ↵ Bekkers , J.M . ( 2011 ). Changes in dendritic axial resistance alter synaptic integration in cerebellar Purkinje cells . Biophys J 100 , 1198 – 1206 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted February 01, 2025. Download PDF Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Efferent signaling along nociceptive peripheral terminals in vivo is enhanced during inflammation Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Efferent signaling along nociceptive peripheral terminals in vivo is enhanced during inflammation Devora Gershon , Omer Barkai , Nurit Engelmayer , Ben Katz , Shaya Lev , Alexander M Binshtok bioRxiv 2025.02.01.636018; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.01.636018 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Efferent signaling along nociceptive peripheral terminals in vivo is enhanced during inflammation Devora Gershon , Omer Barkai , Nurit Engelmayer , Ben Katz , Shaya Lev , Alexander M Binshtok bioRxiv 2025.02.01.636018; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.01.636018 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Neuroscience Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7622) Biochemistry (17648) Bioengineering (13870) Bioinformatics (41880) Biophysics (21423) Cancer Biology (18553) Cell Biology (25458) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13364) Ecology (19866) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24290) Genetics (15589) Genomics (22475) Immunology (17711) Microbiology (40327) Molecular Biology (17145) Neuroscience (88472) Paleontology (666) Pathology (2826) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4815) Physiology (7635) Plant Biology (15114) Scientific Communication and Education (2044) Synthetic Biology (4286) Systems Biology (9815) Zoology (2268)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00