Which phenotypic traits are under selection under warm, dry climates in black spruce?

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. • Trees are increasingly at risk of maladaptation to their environment as climates change rapidly world-wide. Although adaptive evolution by natural selection is a key mechanism by which populations and species can avoid extinction in changing environments, we have limited information regarding the phenotypic traits under selection under warm and dry environments. We answer the following research questions: (1) What ecophysiological traits are under selection in warm and dry environments? (2) Will intrapopulation trait integration affect the response to selection in the warmer, drier site? (3) Is the plastic response of traits under selection adaptive? • We studied 425 trees from seven provenances across three 50-year-old Picea mariana (black spruce) provenance trials located along a spatial climate gradient across eastern Canada. We measured height growth rate as a performance metric, and 10 traits that reflect water use, thermoregulation, structural support, and photosynthetic rate. • All traits were under selection in at least one site, mostly in combination with other traits. For two trait combinations, the strength of selection gradients significantly increased from the colder, wetter site to the warmer, drier site: water use efficiency (WUE) with Huber value (HV), and carbon-to-nitrogen ratio (CN) with HV. In the warmer and drier site, trait-trait correlations among these three traits were largely absent, except for CN:HV in two provenances. The plastic response to the spatial climate gradient was adaptive for WUE but maladaptive for HV and CN. • Results suggest that adaptive evolution in response to climate change in P. mariana may favor phenotypes with fewer needles that are conservative for water and resource use. Intrapopulation trait integration should minimally impede adaptive evolution. However, the species’ plastic responses to warmer and drier conditions may constrain the expression of optimally adapted phenotypes. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2T34M Life Sciences Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.; climate change; common gardens; functional traits; performance landscape; phenotypic integration; provenance trials; selection gradient analysis, Huber value; water use efficiency; leaf nitrogen to carbon ratio, Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P., climate change, common gardens, functional traits, performance landscape, phenotypic integration, provenance trials, selection gradient analysis, Huber value, Water Use Efficiency, leaf nitrogen to carbon ratio Published: 2025-06-06 15:58 Last Updated: 2025-06-07 04:15 CC-BY Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Conflict of interest statement: We do not have a conflict of interest to declare Data and Code Availability Statement: Data is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15571506 Language: English