Evaluating the performance of photon- and electron-based fragmentation methods in Omnitrap-LCMS analysis of N-glycopeptides

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,581 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract To date, collision-induced dissociation and methods based on electron transfer dissociation are considered the standard approaches for the mass spectrometry analysis of N- and O-glycopeptides, respectively, allowing for identification of both peptide and glycan compositions. In recent years, alternative fragmentation methods such as ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) and more energetic versions of electron-based techniques (such as electron ionisation dissociation, EID) have been shown to be useful for the analysis of glycopeptides, producing rich information on the glycopeptide structure, including types of glycosidic linkages. We evaluated ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD), electron ionization dissociation (EID), electron capture dissociation (ECD), and activated-ion ECD (AI-ECD) using an Orbitrap–Omnitrap hybrid for LC–MS analysis of complex N-glycopeptides. Both UVPD and EID generated extensive peptide, glycosidic, and cross-ring fragments, enabling detailed structural characterization. While ECD alone produced few glycopeptide identifications, AI-ECD significantly improved yields through supplemental vibrational activation. UVPD and EID achieved comparable identification efficiencies to stepped collisional dissociation and provided additional linkage information. These results establish the Omnitrap as a powerful platform for comprehensive glycoproteomic analysis and highlight the need for enhanced computational tools to interpret complex UVPD and EID spectra. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00