Diagnostic laparoscopy in primary infertility

In: Diagnosis and Management of Tubo-Uterine Factors in Infertility · 1984 · pp. 167–170 · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-7621-7_33 · W14166982
book-chapter OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-13

This study evaluated laparoscopy results among 113 consecutive women with primary infertility to assess its role in diagnosing factors like endometriosis and pelvic adhesions.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13 · read from full text

This chapter discusses diagnostic laparoscopy in 113 consecutive women with primary infertility, addressing the question of whether laparoscopy should be performed after other tests fail or early in the infertility work-up. It describes that many infertility factors, including endometriosis and pelvic adhesions, are evaluated by laparoscopy, and presents the results from the consecutive cohort. The chapter’s main limitation is that the provided text does not include the detailed outcomes, diagnostic categories, or explicit caveats from the full analysis. Relevance to endometriosis: the paper explicitly states that endometriosis is among the infertility factors best evaluated by laparoscopy, though the chapter’s main focus is the diagnostic timing and results of laparoscopy in primary infertility.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 2,324 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 3 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Laparoscopy is commonly used in infertility work-up1. However, the optimal timing of laparoscopy is not so straightforward. Some prefer performing laparoscopy if other diagnostic tests fail to identify an apparent aetiological factor, whereas some prefer performing laparoscopy early. It is generally known that many infertility factors such as endometriosis and pelvic adhesions are best evaluated by laparoscopy2. In this study, we evaluated the laparoscopy results among 113 consecutive women who had primary infertility. Preview Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Corson, S. L. (1979). Use of laparoscope in the infertile patient. Fertil. Steril., 32, 359 Musich, J. R. and Behrman, S. J. (1982). Infertility laparoscopy in perspective. Review of five hundred cases. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 143, 293 Marik, J. J. (1979). Role of pelvic endoscopy in infertility. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol., 22, 121 Mausner, J. S. and Bahn, A. K. (1974). Epidemiology: An Introductory Text. pp. 243–50. ( Philadelphia: Columbia Broadcasting System, WB Saunders ) Israel, R. and March, C. M. (1976). Diagnostic laparoscopy: A prognostic aid in the surgical management of infertility. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 125, 969 Gomel, V. (1983). An odyssey through the oviduct. Fertil. Steril., 89, 144 Editor information Editors and Affiliations Rights and permissions Copyright information © 1984 MTP Press Limited About this chapter Cite this chapter Paavonen, J., Berg, M., Lahtinen, M., Heinonen, P.K. (1984). Diagnostic laparoscopy in primary infertility. In: Harrison, R.F., Bonnar, J., Thompson, W. (eds) Diagnosis and Management of Tubo-Uterine Factors in Infertility. Studies in Fertility and Sterility, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7621-7_33 Download citation DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7621-7_33 Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht Print ISBN: 978-94-011-7623-1 Online ISBN: 978-94-011-7621-7 eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Keywords

- Pelvic Inflammatory Disease - Diagnostic Laparoscopy - Unexplained Infertility - Consecutive Woman - Primary Infertility These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

infertility

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (2)

Cited by (1)

References (8)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK