Stimulus-dependent delay of perceptual filling-in by microsaccades

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,488 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Perception is a function of both stimulus features and active sensory sampling. The illusion of perceptual filling-in occurs when eye gaze is kept still: visual boundary perception may fail, causing adjacent visual features to remarkably merge into one uniform visual surface. Microsaccades–small, involuntary eye movements during gaze fixation–counteract perceptual filling-in, but the mechanisms underlying this process are not well understood. We investigated whether microsaccade efficacy for preventing filling-in depends on two boundary properties, color contrast and retinal eccentricity (distance from gaze center). Twenty-one human participants (male and female) fixated on a point until they experienced filling-in between two isoluminant colored surfaces. We found that increased color contrast independently extends the duration before filling-in but does not alter the impact of individual microsaccades. Conversely, lower eccentricity delayed filling-in only by increasing microsaccade efficacy. We propose that microsaccades facilitate stable boundary perception via a transient retinal motion signal that scales with eccentricity but is invariant to boundary contrast. These results shed light on how incessant eye movements integrate with ongoing stimulus processing to stabilize perceptual detail, with implications for visual rehabilitation and the optimization of visual presentations in virtual and augmented reality environments. Significance Statement To perceive, sense organs actively sample the environment—for example, by touching, sniffing, or moving the eyes. Visual sampling persists even when gaze is fixed on a single point: involuntary microsaccades continuously move the eye in small jumps. We investigated a previously documented observation that microsaccades prevent illusory fading of perceived visual boundaries during fixation. We discovered that despite being connected, microsaccades and fading are sensitive to different stimulus features. Boundaries separating surfaces with more distinct colors inherently took longer to fade. Boundaries closer to the center of vision also took longer to fade, but only because microsaccades were more effective. These findings reveal new insight into how pervasive sensory sampling delivers a stable and detailed perceptual experience. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00