Machine Learning-Based Implied Volatility Prediction and Trading Models for Options | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Machine Learning-Based Implied Volatility Prediction and Trading Models for Options Diao Lin This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7353092/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract The occurrence of a series of major emergencies, such as the Russian-Ukrainian conflict and the COVID-19 epidemic, has caused a huge impact on the financial market, and the volatility of the global market has increased significantly. Facing the volatility risk brought by market uncertainty shocks, accurate prediction of volatility is critical to maintaining stability in financial markets. This paper uses 39 factors and 5 machine learning algorithms to build prediction models for the direction of the option implied volatility. Using the SSE 50ETF option data, this paper examine the out-of-sample performance of different models from two perspectives: statistical prediction accuracy and economic gain of volatility strategy. Compared with Logit model, nonlinear models such as random forest have better performance in predicting the direction of implied volatility, and it is helpful to improve the prediction accuracy by combining multiple models. We rely on the prediction signal to trade delta-neutral option straddle, and find that the random forest model can obtain the highest out-of-sample Sharp ratio. The results of this paper suggest that the use of nonlinear machine learning models helps to improve the forecasting accuracy of implied volatility and improves the out-of-sample performance of volatility trading strategies, which helps investors better manage volatility risk or conduct volatility trading, which is an important revelation for asset pricing and risk management. machine learning implied volatility forecasting volatility trading random forest delta neutral strategy Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7353092","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":524431927,"identity":"a6d1a6a9-32cc-457b-889a-80be90543f9c","order_by":0,"name":"Diao Lin","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Shanghai Jiao Tong University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Diao","middleName":"","lastName":"Lin","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-08-12 08:08:37","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7353092/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7353092/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":92872461,"identity":"7b9f6f5e-a9ee-4ca6-9925-89104ffa1832","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-06 14:18:22","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":81019,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"submission.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7353092/v1/459cafd89e893f2cae4efa8a.docx"},{"id":92872462,"identity":"01628515-5afa-4f80-8024-3633c07fab89","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-06 14:18:22","extension":"json","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":3749,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"92e969bf991d453f806da136d4bcfdf1.json","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7353092/v1/9f20de24bafef9fe0b6ab454.json"},{"id":92872463,"identity":"632eca5d-58a1-42b0-bbb7-743366b21d5e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-06 14:18:22","extension":"xml","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":91767,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"92e969bf991d453f806da136d4bcfdf11enriched.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7353092/v1/6baa5487e21c295f9345ef0d.xml"},{"id":92872465,"identity":"f67687b9-0986-460c-8580-2ef9d20e65fc","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-06 14:18:23","extension":"xml","order_by":4,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":91137,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"92e969bf991d453f806da136d4bcfdf11structuring.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7353092/v1/f2aed5c0dea9064169babd70.xml"},{"id":92872464,"identity":"a231a0a7-79ae-4589-87ba-209c2ddae57a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-06 14:18:22","extension":"html","order_by":5,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":100509,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"earlyproof.html","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7353092/v1/6f398322169f3155fead24bf.html"},{"id":94489751,"identity":"463ed110-d05b-4e34-9f6d-f04d4347120f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-27 17:05:53","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":421414,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"submission.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7353092/v1_covered_fec3c0d6-3f99-4239-a2bb-d3282814dbf1.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Machine Learning-Based Implied Volatility Prediction and Trading Models for Options","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"machine learning, implied volatility forecasting, volatility trading, random forest, delta neutral strategy","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7353092/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7353092/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThe occurrence of a series of major emergencies, such as the Russian-Ukrainian conflict and the COVID-19 epidemic, has caused a huge impact on the financial market, and the volatility of the global market has increased significantly. Facing the volatility risk brought by market uncertainty shocks, accurate prediction of volatility is critical to maintaining stability in financial markets. This paper uses 39 factors and 5 machine learning algorithms to build prediction models for the direction of the option implied volatility. Using the SSE 50ETF option data, this paper examine the out-of-sample performance of different models from two perspectives: statistical prediction accuracy and economic gain of volatility strategy. Compared with Logit model, nonlinear models such as random forest have better performance in predicting the direction of implied volatility, and it is helpful to improve the prediction accuracy by combining multiple models. We rely on the prediction signal to trade delta-neutral option straddle, and find that the random forest model can obtain the highest out-of-sample Sharp ratio. The results of this paper suggest that the use of nonlinear machine learning models helps to improve the forecasting accuracy of implied volatility and improves the out-of-sample performance of volatility trading strategies, which helps investors better manage volatility risk or conduct volatility trading, which is an important revelation for asset pricing and risk management.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Machine Learning-Based Implied Volatility Prediction and Trading Models for Options","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-10-06 14:18:18","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7353092/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"2ebcdc9e-08af-4f5d-8972-8d24de1635d9","owner":[],"postedDate":"October 6th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-10-27T15:16:11+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-10-06 14:18:18","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7353092","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7353092","identity":"rs-7353092","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.