⚙
AI-generated summary
by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08
ⓘ
This study analyzed 8,000 ovarian cancers in 1.3 million women, finding that tubal ligation, parity, and breastfeeding risks varied significantly by histological phenotype, supporting distinct origins for different ovarian cancer types.
⚙
AI-generated deep summary
by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10
· read from full text
ⓘ
This doctoral thesis examined whether population-level risk factors for ovarian cancer differ by histological phenotype, focusing on hypothesized distinct origins of high-grade serous versus endometrioid/clear cell tumours. Using the Million Women Study cohort of 1.3 million women with about 8,000 incident ovarian/peritoneal/fallopian tube cancers identified via national registries and questionnaire data at recruitment, the author estimated adjusted relative risks with Cox proportional hazards models. Tubal ligation and reproductive factors such as parity and breastfeeding were generally associated with reduced risks, but these associations were highly heterogeneous by histotype; specifically, risks of endometrioid and clear cell tumours were substantially reduced with tubal ligation yet substantially increased in nulliparous women. A caveat reflected in the design is that histotype-specific associations depend on accurate phenotype classification from registry-based ascertainment, and the thesis also notes separate methodological pilot work for future tissue-based studies. Relevance to endometriosis: endometrioid and clear cell ovarian cancers were discussed as hypothesized to develop from endometriosis, and the thesis reported histotype-specific risk patterns consistent with that origin hypothesis, though the paper’s main focus is ovarian cancer risk factors by histological type.
Abstract
There is growing evidence that the different histological types of ovarian cancer have diverse origins. Many high-grade serous tumours (the most common type) are hypothesised to arise from the fallopian tubes, while endometrioid and clear cell tumours are hypothesised to develop from endometriosis, and the origins of mucinous tumours are uncertain. If these hypotheses are true, then the population-level risk factors for the ovarian cancer histotypes should likewise vary – but few epidemiological studies have sufficient cases to explore this. This thesis investigates the association between ovarian cancer and various exposures (including tubal ligation and reproductive factors), in a cohort of 1.3 million women, with 8,000 incident ovarian cancers. Participants completed a questionnaire at recruitment, and were followed up for routinely collected information on cancers and deaths using national registries. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted relative risks of ovarian cancer in women by different exposures. Tubal ligation was associated with reduced risks of cancers of the ovary, and also of the peritoneum and fallopian tube; parity and breastfeeding were also associated with reduced risks of ovarian cancer. These associations with ovarian cancer were highly heterogeneous between the different histological tumour types, consistent with hypotheses of their distinct origins. In particular, risks of endometrioid and clear cell tumours were substantially reduced amongst women with tubal ligation, but substantially increased amongst nulliparous women. For high-grade serous carcinomas, there was a smaller but significant reduction in risk with tubal ligation, and no significant association with parity. I also describe some methodological studies I set up for future tissue-based work: developing techniques in image analysis, and a pilot study of obtaining linked pathology reports and tissue samples. The population-level associations demonstrated by histotype are largely consistent with the new hypotheses of the different origins of ovarian cancer histotypes.
Full text
3,016 characters
· extracted from
oa-html
· click to expand
Thesis
Risk factors for ovarian cancer by histological phenotype in the Million Women Study
- Abstract:
-
There is growing evidence that the different histological types of ovarian cancer have diverse origins. Many high-grade serous tumours (the most common type) are hypothesised to arise from the fallopian tubes, while endometrioid and clear cell tumours are hypothesised to develop from endometriosis, and the origins of mucinous tumours are uncertain. If these hypotheses are true, then the population-level risk factors for the ovarian cancer histotypes should likewise vary – but few epidemiological studies have sufficient cases to explore this. This thesis investigates the association between ovarian cancer and various exposures (including tubal ligation and reproductive factors), in a cohort of 1.3 million women, with 8,000 incident ovarian cancers. Participants completed a questionnaire at recruitment, and were followed up for routinely collected information on cancers and deaths using national registries. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted relative risks of ovarian cancer in women by different exposures. Tubal ligation was associated with reduced risks of cancers of the ovary, and also of the peritoneum and fallopian tube; parity and breastfeeding were also associated with reduced risks of ovarian cancer. These associations with ovarian cancer were highly heterogeneous between the different histological tumour types, consistent with hypotheses of their distinct origins. In particular, risks of endometrioid and clear cell tumours were substantially reduced amongst women with tubal ligation, but substantially increased amongst nulliparous women. For high-grade serous carcinomas, there was a smaller but significant reduction in risk with tubal ligation, and no significant association with parity. I also describe some methodological studies I set up for future tissue-based work: developing techniques in image analysis, and a pilot study of obtaining linked pathology reports and tissue samples. The population-level associations demonstrated by histotype are largely consistent with the new hypotheses of the different origins of ovarian cancer histotypes.
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Dissemination version, pdf, 23.7MB, Terms of use)
-
Authors
Contributors
- Institution:
- University of Oxford
- Division:
- MSD
- Department:
- Nuffield Department of Population Health
- Sub department:
- Population Health
- Role:
- Supervisor
- Institution:
- University of Oxford
- Division:
- MSD
- Role:
- Supervisor
- DOI:
- Type of award:
- DPhil
- Level of award:
- Doctoral
- Awarding institution:
- University of Oxford
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Subjects:
- UUID:
-
uuid:13acad7f-b3f9-4b56-b9ed-4999da6450a3
- Deposit date:
-
2017-06-03
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Gaitskell, K
- Copyright date:
- 2016
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.