Occupation and the follow-up of infertile couples

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10

This study investigated the impact of occupational factors on the follow-up and outcomes of infertile couples undergoing fertility treatments.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the influence of socioeconomic factors on the outcomes of infertility, including pregnancy, adoption, resolution, and loss to follow-up.DesignProspective observational study.SettingInfertility clinics in 11 teaching hospitals.PatientsNewly registered couples with infertility of > 1 year.InterventionsDemographic, clinical, and occupational data were recorded at registration, and events including treatment, pregnancy, adoption, and resolution were recorded during up to 7 years of follow-up.Main outcome measuresTime to outcomes was evaluated by means of proportional hazards analyses with respect to the occurrence of conception of livebirth, adoption, resolution, or loss to follow-up.Results[1] The clinical predictors of pregnancy included duration of infertility, pregnancy history, female partner's age, diagnosis of tubal defect or endometriosis, and treatment; [2] the likelihood of livebirth was 1.38 times greater in partnerships with a male professional; [3] adoption was 1.64 times more likely with male professional partners; [4] loss to follow-up was 1.61 times more likely if the female partner was unemployed; and [5] the likelihood of resolution was unrelated to occupation or income variables.ConclusionSocioeconomic factors, as expressed by occupation, are significantly associated with important outcomes among infertile couples.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Employment Infertility Infertility Adult Female Follow-Up Studies Forecasting Humans Income Male Patient Dropouts Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome Proportional Hazards Models Prospective Studies

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (1)

Cited by (1)

References (25)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-12T06:07:16.479679+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:11:34.315996+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK