Comparison of Prophylactic Oophorectomy Specimens From Carriers and Noncarriers of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Gene Mutation
article
OA: bronze
CC0
⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary
This study analyzed ovarian tissue from BRCA mutation carriers and non-carriers undergoing prophylactic oophorectomy and found no differences in inclusion cysts, clefts, metaplasia, papillae, dysplasia, or occult neoplasia.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The natural history of ovarian cancer is not well understood and, to date, there is conflicting evidence as to whether or not there is a demonstrable precursor lesion. Some women at high risk of developing ovarian cancer because of their family history elect to have a prophylactic oophorectomy. To determine whether or not a recognizable premalignant lesion could be defined in familial ovarian carcinogenesis, we reviewed ovarian tissue specimens from women whose ovaries were removed prophylactically before gene testing became available and who were tested subsequently for BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutations. METHODS: We analyzed ovarian tissue specimens from 37 women. The specimens were examined for the presence of the following four features: inclusion cysts, clefts and fissures, ovarian epithelial metaplasia, and the presence of papillae on the ovarian surface epithelium. The specimens were also examined closely for the presence of dysplasia and occult neoplasia. Furthermore, the occurrence of endometriosis and benign ovarian tumors was documented in these women. The protein truncation test, nonradioactive single-stranded conformation polymorphism analysis, and heteroduplex analysis, followed by DNA sequencing, were used to identify BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations in either blood samples or ovarian tissue specimens. RESULTS: Eleven women had inherited a mutated BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene; 26 women had not. There was no difference between these groups for any of the features studied. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that many of the histologic "abnormalities" described in "normal" ovaries are, in fact, variations of the normal and are not associated with the development of cancer.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (1)
References (24)
- W90103378 via openalex
- W121553317 via openalex
- W1539403786 via openalex
- W1719453447 via openalex
- W1983719103 via openalex
- W1996960802 via openalex
- W2002555966 via openalex
- W2004400768 via openalex
- W2013743651 via openalex
- W2019205168 via openalex
- W2022159223 via openalex
- W2031749863 via openalex
- W2035765556 via openalex
- W2046241255 via openalex
- W2058064521 via openalex
- W2068458702 via openalex
- W2156728001 via openalex
- W2160459637 via openalex
- W2339471430 via openalex
- W2406914811 via openalex
- W3035130918 via openalex
- W4206551368 via openalex
- W4235019056 via openalex
- W4299389571 via openalex
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-09-07T06:12:11.729357+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:10:29.640636+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK