Misleading Success: Genomes Reveal Critical Risks to European Gray Wolves

2026 · doi:10.64898/2026.03.20.713253
preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,718 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Misleading Success: Genomes Reveal Critical Risks to European Gray Wolves Abstract Have European gray wolves recovered? Despite an increase to ∼21,000 wolves (Canis lupus), our genomic analyses reveal significant risks to their long-term viability. We analyzed over 200 whole-genomes spanning five major European populations. Rather than a single recovering population, European wolves form a mosaic of isolated, independently evolving lineages, mostly diverging in the late Pleistocene. All lineages have contemporary effective population sizes below the threshold for long-term viability (Ne ≥ 500) and show extensive inbreeding. Runs of homozygosity reveal population-specific inbreeding histories spanning recent to deep timeframes. Most lineages exhibit higher realized than masked genetic load, indicating emerging inbreeding depression. These findings challenge claims that downlisting European wolves is biologically warranted: none of these populations currently meets thresholds associated with favorable conservation status. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Subject Area - Biochemistry (17697) - Bioengineering (13894) - Bioinformatics (41951) - Biophysics (21454) - Cancer Biology (18592) - Cell Biology (25507) - Clinical Trials (138) - Developmental Biology (13380) - Ecology (19903) - Epidemiology (2067) - Evolutionary Biology (24321) - Genetics (15610) - Genomics (22509) - Immunology (17737) - Microbiology (40397) - Molecular Biology (17182) - Neuroscience (88618) - Paleontology (667) - Pathology (2833) - Pharmacology and Toxicology (4825) - Physiology (7641) - Plant Biology (15158) - Synthetic Biology (4296) - Systems Biology (9825) - Zoology (2271)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00