Purging of highly deleterious alleles through an extreme bottleneck

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,046 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Transitions to captivity often produce population bottlenecks. On one hand, bottlenecks increase inbreeding and decrease effective population size, thus increasing extinction risk. On the other, elevated homozygosity associated with extreme bottlenecks may purge deleterious alleles. Previous studies of purging in captive breeding programs have focused on phenotypic measurements and may be confounded with environmental effects. We test the ability of natural selection to purge deleterious alleles following an extreme population bottleneck by analysing patterns of genetic diversity in wild and captive-bred populations of the Lord Howe Island stick insect (Dryococelus australis). Dryococelus australis has been bred in captivity for two decades, having passed through an extreme bottleneck – only two mating pairs with few new additions since then. The magnitude of the bottleneck, together with the fact that each female lays hundreds of eggs most of which are not recruited, set up nearly ideal conditions for the purging of deleterious alleles. As expected, captive-bred individuals had a greater number of long runs-of-homozygosity compared to wild individuals, implying strong inbreeding in captivity which would facilitate purging in the homozygous regions. Stop-codon and frameshift alleles were preferentially depleted in captivity compared to other alleles, in coding and non-coding regions. The more deleterious an allele was predicted to be, the more likely it was found outside of runs-of-homozygosity, implying that inbreeding events facilitate the expression and thus removal of deleterious alleles, even after such an extreme bottleneck and under the benign conditions of captivity. These data show that extreme inbreeding has likely decreased the deleterious mutation load of the stick insects, though loss of genetic diversity may make future adaptation more difficult. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes

Abstract

has been updated slightly. Author list revised.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00