⚙
AI-generated deep summary
by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04
· read from full text
ⓘ
This study tested whether healthy adults can form and then reverse aversive associations between two odors using an olfactory reversal conditioning protocol, where one neutral odor (CS+) was paired with a 90 dB aversive sound and the contingencies were reversed after five blocks. Across 300 trials, the researchers collected subjective pleasantness/intensity ratings and multiple physiological and facial measures (skin conductance, ECG/PPG/respiration, facial EMG) plus 64-channel EEG. Group-level results showed no differentiation between CS+ and CS- in any overt behavioural or autonomic/facial measures before or after reversal, and event-related potentials, alpha suppression, and cardiac responses likewise lacked CS specificity, with only above-chance CS discrimination by multivariate EEG/alpha-band classifiers in late post-stimulus intervals that did not map onto physiological or behavioural effects. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Abstract
Reversal learning offers a window into how associations are acquired, updated, and overwritten. Because olfactory inputs bypass much of the thalamus and are tightly linked to emotion, we examined whether humans can flexibly form and subsequently reverse aversive associations to smells. Thirty healthy adults underwent an olfactory reversal conditioning protocol in which one neutral odor (CS+) was followed by a 90 dB aversive sound (US) and a second odor (CS-) was not. After five blocks the contingencies were reversed. Throughout 300 trials we collected ratings of pleasantness and intensity together with autonomic physiological indices (skin conductance, ECG, photoplethysmography, respiration), facial EMG, and 64-channel EEG. Contrary to expectations, pleasantness, intensity, and all autonomic or facial muscle measures failed to differentiate CS+ and CS-either before or after reversal (all p > .01). Event-related potentials, alpha suppression, heart rate and pulse wave responses likewise showed no CS specificity. Only multivariate classifiers: trained (i) on the time-domain EEG signal and (ii) on alpha-band activity, separately, distinguished CS+ from CS-at above-chance levels in late post-stimulus intervals. These neural signatures did not translate into overt physiological or behavioural differences. The pattern suggests that, at least with neutral odors and an auditory US, olfactory fear learning is subtle, spatially variable across the cortex, and easily masked in group-level averages. Our findings highlight both the promise of multivariate EEG for detecting fragile olfactory associations and the challenge of eliciting robust conditioned responses with cross-modal (odor-sound) pairings.
Full text
1,804 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Abstract
Reversal learning offers a window into how associations are acquired, updated, and overwritten. Because olfactory inputs bypass much of the thalamus and are tightly linked to emotion, we examined whether humans can flexibly form and subsequently reverse aversive associations to smells. Thirty healthy adults underwent an olfactory reversal conditioning protocol in which one neutral odor (CS+) was followed by a 90 dB aversive sound (US) and a second odor (CS-) was not. After five blocks the contingencies were reversed. Throughout 300 trials we collected ratings of pleasantness and intensity together with autonomic physiological indices (skin conductance, ECG, photoplethysmography, respiration), facial EMG, and 64-channel EEG. Contrary to expectations, pleasantness, intensity, and all autonomic or facial muscle measures failed to differentiate CS+ and CS-either before or after reversal (all p > .01). Event-related potentials, alpha suppression, heart rate and pulse wave responses likewise showed no CS specificity. Only multivariate classifiers: trained (i) on the time-domain EEG signal and (ii) on alpha-band activity, separately, distinguished CS+ from CS-at above-chance levels in late post-stimulus intervals. These neural signatures did not translate into overt physiological or behavioural differences. The pattern suggests that, at least with neutral odors and an auditory US, olfactory fear learning is subtle, spatially variable across the cortex, and easily masked in group-level averages. Our findings highlight both the promise of multivariate EEG for detecting fragile olfactory associations and the challenge of eliciting robust conditioned responses with cross-modal (odor-sound) pairings.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.