Focal control of thalamocortical gain shapes perception

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14

Localized nicotine application to macaque visual cortex layer 4 altered thalamocortical gain, leading to widespread cortical changes and biased contrast perception.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14 · read from full text

The study investigated how localized modulation of thalamocortical transmission in layer 4 of primary visual cortex affects neural activity across all cortical layers and behavior. Using nicotine to selectively modify processing at a small proportion of thalamocortical synapses in macaque visual cortex, while recording across full cortical depth, the authors found widespread but heterogeneous response changes in neurons. They reported no compensatory circuit adjustments, and these neural and behavioral effects included a bias in perceived contrast during a behavioral task that could be explained by a normalization model with a tuned, multiplicative nicotine gain field; the authors’ main limitation is the reliance on nicotine as a specific modulatory tool to infer thalamocortical gain mechanisms. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

In layer 4 of the primary sensory cortices, sensory data meets contextual information carried by multiple modulatory systems, establishing a point of control with powerful potential: what passes through this gate determines, for all downstream circuits, what exists in the world. Altering the processing state at even a small number of layer 4 thalamocortical synapses should be profoundly impactful on behavior. It is, however, often assumed—based on diffuse innervation of cortex by subcortical nuclei, and dense receptor expression in the association cortices—that the means by which modulatory systems powerfully alter cognition and behavior is through concurrent action across large swaths of tissue, mostly at ‘higher’ levels of cortex. Hypothesizing the converse—that highly localized modulatory changes to thalamocortical transmission could alter behavior—we used nicotine to selectively modify processing at a small proportion of thalamocortical synapses in macaque primary visual cortex, while recording across the full cortical depth. We observed widespread, heterogeneous changes in neuronal responses throughout all layers of cortex. The circuit apparently did not compensate for these changes, because they biased perceived contrast in a behavioral task. The pattern of neural and behavioral response changes we observed depended lawfully on stimulus position and orientation in a manner that could be accounted for by a normalization model with a tuned, multiplicative nicotine gain field. Significance In seeking to understand the role(s) neuromodulators play in cognition and behavior, answers are generally sought in the circuits of the association cortices, and neuromodulation is often conceived of, and modeled, in a manner akin to a coarse-grained—even cortex-wide—volume knob. Here, we show that focal cholinergic modulation of thalamocortical transmission in the visual system reshapes columnar neural activity and alters perceptual performance. Our observations suggest a modulatory architecture capable of precision control of thalamocortical transmission, and thus a previously underappreciated role for modulatory control of cortical gating.
Full text 1,754 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract In layer 4 of the primary sensory cortices, sensory data meets contextual information carried by multiple modulatory systems, establishing a point of control with powerful potential: what passes through this gate determines, for all downstream circuits, what exists in the world. Altering the processing state at even a small number of layer 4 thalamocortical synapses should be profoundly impactful on behavior. It is, however, often assumed based on diffuse innervation of cortex by subcortical nuclei, and dense receptor expression in the association cortices that the means by which modulatory systems powerfully alter cognition and behavior is through concurrent action across large swaths of tissue, mostly at higher levels of cortex. Hypothesizing the converse, that highly localized modulatory changes to thalamocortical transmission could alter behavior, we used nicotine to selectively modify processing at a small proportion of thalamocortical synapses in macaque primary visual cortex, while recording across the full cortical depth. We observed widespread, heterogeneous changes in neuronal responses throughout all layers of cortex. The circuit apparently did not compensate for these changes, because they biased perceived contrast in a behavioral task. The pattern of neural and behavioral response changes we observed depended lawfully on stimulus position and orientation in a manner that could be accounted for by a normalization model with a tuned, multiplicative nicotine gain field. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Minor textual edits for clarity, fix axis labels on a plot, improve quality of supplementary figure, improve clarity in description of fitting procedure

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00