A collection of field-based indicators for assessing ecosystem services in crop fields

2025 · doi:10.3897/arphapreprints.e151539
preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text ⓘ

The paper compiles and describes a set of field-based indicators intended to assess ecosystem services in crop fields, focusing on practical measures that can be collected in situ. It is presented as a collection and not as a clinical or biomedical study, and it does not describe an experimental population, diagnostic outcomes, or disease-specific endpoints. The main caveat is that, being an indicators collection/preprint, the work emphasizes the indicator set and its field applicability rather than demonstrating validated effects in specific study sites or health contexts. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 1,065 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Preprint ARPHA Preprints https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e151539 (27 Feb 2025) https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e151539 (27 Feb 2025) Published in: One Ecosystem https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.10.e151491 Other versions: - Preprint InfoPreprint Info - CiteCite - MetricsMetrics - CommentComment - RelatedRelated - CitedCited ARPHA Preprints doi: 10.3897/arphapreprints.e151539 First posted 27 Feb 2025 Authors Lola Leveau - Corresponding author Earth & Life Institute - UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium Earth & Life Institute - UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium Earth & Life Institute - UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium Earth & Life Institute - UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium Conflict of interest The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Supporting agencies UCLouvain This is an open access preprint distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00