Love Thy Neighbor? Exploring Gastroenterology Attitudes Toward Endometriosis Screening

other OA: closed public-domain-us
Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-13

A survey of gastroenterology providers found that most do not currently screen for endometriosis, but would be very likely to do so if presented with data on its high prevalence in GI symptom patients.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13 · read from full text

This paper investigates gastroenterology providers’ attitudes toward endometriosis screening in gastroenterology clinic populations, using an anonymized exploratory survey of 112 providers with a 40.1% response rate. Most respondents reported they currently do not screen for endometriosis (59.4%), but when presented with data showing the high prevalence of chronic gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with endometriosis, 72.1% stated they would be extremely likely or somewhat likely to screen. The study’s main caveat is that it is based on self-reported survey responses with no generated datasets, so it does not evaluate actual screening practices. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it examines gastroenterology attitudes toward endometriosis screening in settings where GI symptoms overlap.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic painful condition affecting 10% of reproductive-aged women with a high prevalence of overlapping gastrointestinal symptoms. There is a significant diagnostic delay for endometriosis and current screening practices for endometriosis in gastroenterology clinic populations have not been evaluated. 112 gastroenterology providers (57.5% females, 64.3% physicians) completed an anonymized exploratory survey (40.1% response rate). Most respondents (59.4%) currently do not screen for endometriosis, but the majority (72.1%) reported they would be "extremely likely" or "somewhat likely" to screen for endometriosis after being presented with data on the high prevalence of chronic GI symptoms in patients with endometriosis.
Full text 4,699 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic painful condition affecting 10% of reproductive-aged women with a high prevalence of overlapping gastrointestinal symptoms. There is a significant diagnostic delay for endometriosis and current screening practices for endometriosis in gastroenterology clinic populations have not been evaluated. 112 gastroenterology providers (57.5% females, 64.3% physicians) completed an anonymized exploratory survey (40.1% response rate). Most respondents (59.4%) currently do not screen for endometriosis, but the majority (72.1%) reported they would be “extremely likely” or “somewhat likely” to screen for endometriosis after being presented with data on the high prevalence of chronic GI symptoms in patients with endometriosis. Similar content being viewed by others Data availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

Shafrir AL, Farland LV, Shah DK et al. Risk for and consequences of endometriosis: A critical epidemiologic review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;51:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.06.001. Maroun P, Cooper MJW, Reid GD, Keirse MJNC. Relevance of gastrointestinal symptoms in endometriosis. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;49:411–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01030.x. Nezhat C, Li A, Falik R et al. Bowel endometriosis: diagnosis and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218:549–562. Viganò D, Zara F, Usai P. Irritable bowel syndrome and endometriosis: New insights for old diseases. Dig Liver Dis 2018;50:213–219. Yang F, Wu Y, Hockey R, Doust J, Mishra GD, Montgomery GW, Mortlock S. Evidence of shared genetic factors in the etiology of gastrointestinal disorders and endometriosis and clinical implications for disease management. Cell Rep Med. 2023;8:101250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101250. Greene R, Stratton P, Cleary SD, Ballweg ML, Sinaii N. Diagnostic experience among 4,334 women reporting surgically diagnosed endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:32–39. Macer ML, Taylor HS. Endometriosis and infertility: a review of the pathogenesis and treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2012;39:535–549. Grandi G, Toss A, Cortesi L, Botticelli L, Volpe A, Cagnacci A. The association between endometriomas and ovarian cancer: preventive effect of inhibiting ovulation and menstruation during reproductive life. BioMed Res Int. 2015;2015:751571. Agarwal SK, Chapron C, Giudice LC et al. Clinical diagnosis of endometriosis: a call to action. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220:354.e1-354.e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.12.039. Meurs-Szojda MM, Mijatovic V, Felt-Bersma RJ et al. Irritable bowel syndrome and chronic constipation in patients with endometriosis. Colorectal Dis 2011;13:67–71. Yu V, McHenry N, Proctor S, Wolf J, Nee J. Gastroenterologist primer: endometriosis for gastroenterologists. Dig Dis Sci. 2023;68:2482–2492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-022-07674-7. Kramer KJ, Rhoads-Baeza ME, Sadek S, Chao C, Bell C, Recanati MA. Trends and evolution in women’s health workforce in the first quarter of the t century. World J Gynecol Womens Health. 2022;5:622. https://doi.org/10.33552/wjgwh.2022.05.000622. Sharma ND, Young KC, Feld LD, Rabinowitz LG. Patched but still leaky: an update on the pipeline for women in gastroenterology. Dig Dis Sci. 2024;69:3661–3669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08587-3. Funding NA. Author information Authors and Affiliations Contributions All authors were involved in the conception, methodology and execution of study. YL wrote the main manuscript text. XW, LK and MS provided critical edits to manuscript. All authors have reviewed and approved the final draft to be submitted. Corresponding author Ethics declarations Competing interest The authors declare no competing interests. Additional information Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. About this article Cite this article Luo, Y., Wang, X.J., Keefer, L.A. et al. Love Thy Neighbor? Exploring Gastroenterology Attitudes Toward Endometriosis Screening. Dig Dis Sci 70, 978–981 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08740-y Received: Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08740-y

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Attitude of Health Personnel Attitude of Health Personnel Attitude of Health Personnel Attitude of Health Personnel Attitude of Health Personnel Attitude of Health Personnel Attitude of Health Personnel Attitude of Health Personnel Attitude of Health Personnel Attitude of Health Personnel Attitude of Health Personnel Attitude of Health Personnel Attitude of Health Personnel Attitude of Health Personnel Attitude of Health Personnel Attitude of Health Personnel Attitude of Health Personnel Attitude of Health Personnel Attitude of Health Personnel Attitude of Health Personnel

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-05T06:14:40.014199+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-09-05T06:12:11.175272+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-11T08:34:28.763810+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine