Frequency-Dependent Modulation of Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis, Memory, and BDNF Signaling by Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Adult hippocampal neurogenesis plays a central role in learning, memory formation, and adaptive neural plasticity, making it an attractive target for noninvasive neuromodulation strategies. Low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) has emerged as a promising modality for modulating brain function, yet its effects on adult neurogenesis and the role of stimulation frequency remain incompletely understood. In this study, we evaluated whether transcranial LIFU applied to the dentate gyrus influences neurogenic and cognitive outcomes in a frequency-dependent manner. Adult rats received twice-weekly ultrasound stimulation for four weeks at 0.5, 1, or 5 MHz. Neurogenesis was assessed through BrdU incorporation and neuronal differentiation by BrdU/NeuN co-labeling, while expression of neurogenesis-associated markers (BDNF, FGF-2, and Sox-2) was quantified using qRT-PCR. Behavioral effects were examined using the novel object recognition task. Among the tested conditions, 0.5 MHz stimulation produced the most pronounced neurogenic response, with increased cellular proliferation in the dentate gyrus, elevated expression of neurogenic markers, and improved recognition memory relative to sham-treated animals. Higher stimulation frequencies yielded comparatively weaker effects. These findings identify stimulation frequency as a critical determinant of LIFU-driven neuroplastic responses and support the potential of focused ultrasound as a noninvasive approach for promoting hippocampal regeneration and functional recovery.
Full text 1,650 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Adult hippocampal neurogenesis plays a central role in learning, memory formation, and adaptive neural plasticity, making it an attractive target for noninvasive neuromodulation strategies. Low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) has emerged as a promising modality for modulating brain function, yet its effects on adult neurogenesis and the role of stimulation frequency remain incompletely understood. In this study, we evaluated whether transcranial LIFU applied to the dentate gyrus influences neurogenic and cognitive outcomes in a frequency-dependent manner. Adult rats received twice-weekly ultrasound stimulation for four weeks at 0.5, 1, or 5 MHz. Neurogenesis was assessed through BrdU incorporation and neuronal differentiation by BrdU/NeuN co-labeling, while expression of neurogenesis-associated markers (BDNF, FGF-2, and Sox-2) was quantified using qRT-PCR. Behavioral effects were examined using the novel object recognition task. Among the tested conditions, 0.5 MHz stimulation produced the most pronounced neurogenic response, with increased cellular proliferation in the dentate gyrus, elevated expression of neurogenic markers, and improved recognition memory relative to sham-treated animals. Higher stimulation frequencies yielded comparatively weaker effects. These findings identify stimulation frequency as a critical determinant of LIFU-driven neuroplastic responses and support the potential of focused ultrasound as a noninvasive approach for promoting hippocampal regeneration and functional recovery. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes ↵* co-senior authors.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00