Minimally invasive surgery in pelvic pain: from a gynecological perspective

In: Gynecology and Pelvic Medicine · 2021 · vol. 4 , pp. 5 · doi:10.21037/gpm-2020-pfd-04 · W3083087355
article OA: diamond CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This review details minimally invasive surgical management of chronic pelvic pain from a gynecological and neuropelveological perspective, discussing various pathologies, techniques, and the importance of a multidisciplinary approach.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This gynecological review examines minimally invasive surgical approaches for chronic pelvic pain (CPP), including hysteroscopy and diagnostic laparoscopy, as well as conventional versus robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery, emphasizing gynecologic and retroperitoneal pathologies. It reports that CPP is common and often lacks a clear pathology, and that minimally invasive techniques may offer benefits such as shorter hospital stays and less postoperative pain, while diagnostic laparoscopy identifies intraperitoneal findings in many patients yet can yield no pathology in about a third of cases. For specific interventions, the review describes adhesion surgery (with variable pain outcomes across studies and ongoing debate about causality), notes that adhesion prevention agents lack evidence, and highlights limitations such as the invasiveness of laparoscopy and possible missed retroperitoneal or non-gynecologic causes. Relevance to endometriosis: the review cites endometriosis as a common laparoscopic finding in CPP workups and discusses hysteroscopic treatment “to a limited extent” in adenomyosis, though the paper is a broad surgical-technique review rather than an endometriosis/adenomyosis-focused study.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract: This review on the minimally invasive surgical management of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) was constructed from a synthesis of our experience and the literature. Following a description of CPP and its causes, a general introduction to minimal invasive approaches applied in the treatment of CPP from a gynecological perspective was given. Then the surgical management of several most important pelvic pathologies causing CPP was explained in detail. Not only gynecological, but also pelvic neurological pathologies were discussed in this review. A neuropelveological approach to CPP was also included. An extensive literature research was conducted by the authors and chosen studies were included based on strength and relevance. Due to its multifactorial etiology, CPP has been a challenging subject for clinicians. Because of the dynamic nature of surgical innovations especially in the field of minimal invasive surgery, a variety of techniques have been developed and tested in the treatment of CPP and we tried to cover the most important ones. We aimed to reflect the advantages and disadvantages of the surgical management of CPP according to different etiologies and also according to the application of different surgical techniques such as the use of the robotic platform. An emphasis was given to the importance of a multidisciplinary approach.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (2)

Cited by (1)

References (3)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK