Minimally invasive surgery in pelvic pain: from a gynecological perspective

In: Gynecology and Pelvic Medicine · 2021 · vol. 4 , pp. 5 · doi:10.21037/gpm-2020-pfd-04 · W3083087355
article OA: diamond CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This review details minimally invasive surgical management of chronic pelvic pain from a gynecological and neuropelveological perspective, discussing various pathologies, techniques, and the importance of a multidisciplinary approach.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

This gynecological review examines minimally invasive surgical approaches for chronic pelvic pain (CPP), including hysteroscopy and diagnostic laparoscopy, as well as conventional versus robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery, emphasizing gynecologic and retroperitoneal pathologies. It reports that CPP is common and often lacks a clear pathology, and that minimally invasive techniques may offer benefits such as shorter hospital stays and less postoperative pain, while diagnostic laparoscopy identifies intraperitoneal findings in many patients yet can yield no pathology in about a third of cases. For specific interventions, the review describes adhesion surgery (with variable pain outcomes across studies and ongoing debate about causality), notes that adhesion prevention agents lack evidence, and highlights limitations such as the invasiveness of laparoscopy and possible missed retroperitoneal or non-gynecologic causes. Relevance to endometriosis: the review cites endometriosis as a common laparoscopic finding in CPP workups and discusses hysteroscopic treatment “to a limited extent” in adenomyosis, though the paper is a broad surgical-technique review rather than an endometriosis/adenomyosis-focused study.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract: This review on the minimally invasive surgical management of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) was constructed from a synthesis of our experience and the literature. Following a description of CPP and its causes, a general introduction to minimal invasive approaches applied in the treatment of CPP from a gynecological perspective was given. Then the surgical management of several most important pelvic pathologies causing CPP was explained in detail. Not only gynecological, but also pelvic neurological pathologies were discussed in this review. A neuropelveological approach to CPP was also included. An extensive literature research was conducted by the authors and chosen studies were included based on strength and relevance. Due to its multifactorial etiology, CPP has been a challenging subject for clinicians. Because of the dynamic nature of surgical innovations especially in the field of minimal invasive surgery, a variety of techniques have been developed and tested in the treatment of CPP and we tried to cover the most important ones. We aimed to reflect the advantages and disadvantages of the surgical management of CPP according to different etiologies and also according to the application of different surgical techniques such as the use of the robotic platform. An emphasis was given to the importance of a multidisciplinary approach.
Full text 61,249 characters · extracted from oa-html · 2 sections · click to expand

Conclusions

Due to the multifactorial etiology of CPP, its diagnosis and management is challenging in clinical practice. CPP can be caused by gynecological, gastrointestinal, urological, musculoskeletal and psychological conditions. Therefore, a multidisciplinary management and if possible in specialized centers is recommended. Nowadays, with the advances in minimal invasive surgical techniques and with the introduction of new approaches such as neuropelveology more patients receive a successful diagnosis and treatment. Even in complicated operations such as DIE surgeries, both conventional laparoscopy and robot-assisted laparoscopy have replaced laparotomy. As the understanding of pelvic neurophysiology advances nerve sparing surgeries with minimal invasive techniques are replacing neuroablative procedures with better outcomes. Thus, minimal invasive surgery is now the gold standard in surgical treatment of CPP. However, despite of all these advances recurrence and persistence of pain postoperatively should always be kept in mind. Therefore, a multidisciplinary preoperative evaluation is always emphasized for better outcomes. In Table 3, the take-home messages of this review can be seen. Full table Acknowledgments Funding: None. Footnote Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned by the Guest Editor (Gokhan Kilic) for the series “Minimally Invasive Treatment Modalities for Female Pelvic Floor Disorders” published in Gynecology and Pelvic Medicine. The article has undergone external peer review. Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://gpm.amegroups.org/article/view/10.21037/gpm-2020-pfd-04/coif). The series “Minimally Invasive Treatment Modalities for Female Pelvic Floor Disorders” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare. Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

References

- Howard FM. The role of laparoscopy in chronic pelvic pain: promise and pitfalls. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1993;48:357-87. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Smith SE, Eckert JM. Interventional Pain Management and Female Pelvic Pain: Considerations for Diagnosis and Treatment. Semin Reprod Med 2018;36:159-63. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Chronic Pelvic Pain. ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 218. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135:e98-109. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Chronic Pelvic Pain [Internet]. [cited 2020 May 6]. Available online: Pelvic Painhttps://www.acog.org/en/Patient Resources/FAQs/Gynecologic Problems/Chronic - Ahangari A. Prevalence of chronic pelvic pain among women: an updated review. Pain Physician 2014;17:E141-7. [PubMed] - Jarrell JF, Vilos GA, Allaire C, et al. No. 164-Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2018;40:e747-87. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Reiter RC. A profile of women with chronic pelvic pain. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1990;33:130-6. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Vercellini P, Fedele L, Aimi G, et al. Association between endometriosis stage, lesion type, patient characteristics and severity of pelvic pain symptoms: a multivariate analysis of over 1000 patients. Hum Reprod 2007;22:266-71. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Brawn J, Morotti M, Zondervan KT, et al. Central changes associated with chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis. Hum Reprod Update 2014;20:737-47. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Truong M, Kim JH, Scheib S, et al. Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2016;28:304-10. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Committee on Gynecologic Practice. Committee Opinion No 701: Choosing the Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Disease. Obstet Gynecol 2017;129:e155-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Di Spiezio Sardo A, Guida M, Bettocchi S, et al. Role of hysteroscopy in evaluating chronic pelvic pain. Fertil Steril 2008;90:1191-6. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Reich H, DeCaprio J, McGlynn F. Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg 1989;5:213-6. [Crossref] - Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;2015:CD003677. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Nagata H, Komatsu H, Nagaya Y, et al. Comparison of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with Abdominal Total Hysterectomy in Patients with Benign Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Yonago Acta Med 2019;62:273-7. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Geetha P, Nair MK. Laparoscopic, robotic and open method of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review. J Minim Access Surg 2012;8:67-73. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Kluivers KB, Hendriks JCM, Mol BWJ, et al. Quality of life and surgical outcome after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a randomized, controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007;14:145-52. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Wiener J. Chronic pelvic pain. Practitioner 1994;238:352-7. [PubMed] - Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Chronic Pelvic Pain, Initial Management (Green-top Guideline No. 41). Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 May 8]; Green-top Guideline (No. 41). Available online: https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg41/ - Hebbar S, Chawla C. Role of laparoscopy in evaluation of chronic pelvic pain. J Minim Access Surg 2005;1:116-20. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Drozgyik I, Vizer M, Szabó I. Significance of laparoscopy in the management of chronic pelvic pain. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007;133:223-6. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Kang SB, Chung HH, Lee HP, et al. Impact of diagnostic laparoscopy on the management of chronic pelvic pain. Surg Endosc 2007;21:916-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Doyle DF, Li TC, Richmond MN. The prevalence of continuing chronic pelvic pain following a negative laparoscopy. J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;18:252-5. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Milingos S, Protopapas A, Kallipolitis G, et al. Laparoscopic evaluation of infertile patients with chronic pelvic pain. Reprod Biomed Online 2006;12:347-53. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Behera M, Vilos GA, Hollett-Caines J, et al. Laparoscopic findings, histopathologic evaluation, and clinical outcomes in women with chronic pelvic pain after hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2006;13:431-5. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Yasmin H, Bombieri L, Hollingworth J. What happens to women with chronic pelvic pain after a negative [normal] laparoscopy? J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;25:283-5. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Elcombe S, Gath D, Day A. The psychological effects of laparoscopy on women with chronic pelvic pain. Psychol Med 1997;27:1041-50. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Møller SG, Dohrn N, Brisling SK, et al. Laparoscopic Versus Robotic-assisted Suturing Performance Among Novice Surgeons: A Blinded, Cross-Over Study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2020;30:117-22. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Lawrie TA, Liu H, Lu D, et al. Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;4:CD011422. [PubMed] - Boggess JF. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: evolution of a new surgical paradigm. J Robot Surg 2007;1:31-7. [Crossref] [PubMed] - van Dam P, Hauspy J, Verkinderen L, et al. Are costs of robot-assisted surgery warranted for gynecological procedures? Obstet Gynecol Int 2011;2011:973830. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Winter ML, Leu SY, Lagrew DC, et al. Cost comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus standard laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Robot Surg 2015;9:269-75. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Lönnerfors C, Reynisson P, Persson J. A randomized trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy vs robot-assisted hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015;22:78-86. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Taner U, Aysel O, Ahmet K, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic management of a vascular entrapment of the sacral nerve roots causing pelvic pain. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2019;45:1603-7. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Lambaudie E, Houvenaeghel G, Walz J, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology. Surg Endosc 2008;22:2743-7. [Crossref] [PubMed] - ten Broek RP, Issa Y, van Santbrink EJ, et al. Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis. BMJ 2013;347:f5588. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Cunanan RG, Courey NG, Lippes J. Laparoscopic findings in patients with pelvic pain. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983;146:589-91. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Nezhat FR, Crystal RA, Nezhat CH, et al. Laparoscopic Adhesiolysis and Relief of Chronic Pelvic Pain. JSLS 2000;4:281-5. [PubMed] - Kresch AJ, Seifer DB, Sachs LB, et al. Laparoscopy in 100 women with chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 1984;64:672-4. [PubMed] - Cheong Y, Saran M, Hounslow JW, et al. Are pelvic adhesions associated with pain, physical, emotional and functional characteristics of women presenting with chronic pelvic pain? A cluster analysis. BMC Womens Health 2018;18:11. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Kavic SM, Kavic SM. Adhesions and Adhesiolysis: The Role of Laparoscopy. JSLS 2002;6:99-109. [PubMed] - Maier DB, Nulsen JC, Klock A, et al. Laser laparoscopy versus laparotomy in lysis of pelvic adhesions. J Reprod Med 1992;37:965-8. [PubMed] - Cheong YC, Reading I, Bailey S, et al. Should women with chronic pelvic pain have adhesiolysis? BMC Womens Health 2014;14:36. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Onders RP, Mittendorf EA. Utility of laparoscopy in chronic abdominal pain. Surgery 2003;134:549-52; discussion 552-4. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Gerner-Rasmussen J, Burcharth J, Gögenur I. The efficacy of adhesiolysis on chronic abdominal pain: a systematic review. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2015;400:567-76. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Swank DJ, Swank-Bordewijk SCG, Hop WCJ, et al. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain: a blinded randomised controlled multi-centre trial. Lancet 2003;361:1247-51. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Roman H, Hulsey TF, Marpeau L, et al. Why laparoscopic adhesiolysis should not be the victim of a single randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:136.e1-136.e4. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Vettoretto N, Carrara A, Corradi A, et al. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis: consensus conference guidelines. Colorectal Dis 2012;14:e208-15. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Holloran-Schwartz MB. Surgical evaluation and treatment of the patient with chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2014;41:357-69. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Gomel V, Koninckx PR. Microsurgical principles and postoperative adhesions: from the past. Fertil Steril 2016;106:1025-31. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Luciano DE, Roy G, Luciano AA. Adhesion reformation after laparoscopic adhesiolysis: where, what type, and in whom they are most likely to recur. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008;15:44-8. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Missmer SA. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1244-56. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Nnoaham KE, Hummelshoj L, Webster P, et al. Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and work productivity: a multicenter study across ten countries. Fertil Steril 2011;96:366-373.e8. [Crossref] [PubMed] - De Graaff AA, D'Hooghe TM, Dunselman GA, et al. The significant effect of endometriosis on physical, mental and social wellbeing: results from an international cross-sectional survey. Hum Reprod 2013;28:2677-85. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Luciano DE, Luciano AA. Management of endometriosis-related pain: an update. Womens Health Lond Engl 2011;7:585-90. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Frishman GN, Salak JR. Conservative surgical management of endometriosis in women with pelvic pain. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2006;13:546-58. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Vercellini P, Crosignani PG, Abbiati A, et al. The effect of surgery for symptomatic endometriosis: the other side of the story. Hum Reprod Update 2009;15:177-88. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Dunselman GA, Vermeulen N, Becker C, et al. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2014;29:400-12. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Abbott J, Hawe J, Hunter D, et al. Laparoscopic excision of endometriosis: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2004;82:878-84. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Duffy JMN, Arambage K, Correa FJS, et al. Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014.CD011031. [PubMed] - Byrne D, Curnow T, Smith P, et al. Laparoscopic excision of deep rectovaginal endometriosis in BSGE endometriosis centres: a multicentre prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2018;8:e018924. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Yeung PP, Shwayder J, Pasic RP. Laparoscopic management of endometriosis: comprehensive review of best evidence. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009;16:269-81. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Senapati S, Atashroo D, Carey E, et al. Surgical interventions for chronic pelvic pain. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2016;28:290-6. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Yu O, Schulze-Rath R, Grafton J, et al. Adenomyosis incidence, prevalence and treatment: United States population-based study 2006-201. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020;223:94.e1-94.e10. [Crossref] - Solnik MJ, Munro MG. Indications and alternatives to hysterectomy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2014;57:14-42. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Van den Bosch T, Dueholm M, Leone FP, et al. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;46:284-98. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Rasmussen CK, Hansen ES, Ernst E, et al. Two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography for diagnosis of adenomyosis of the inner myometrium. Reprod Biomed Online 2019;38:750-60. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Exacoustos C, Brienza L, Di Giovanni A, et al. Adenomyosis: three-dimensional sonographic findings of the junctional zone and correlation with histology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37:471-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Won HR, Abbott J. Optimal management of chronic cyclical pelvic pain: an evidence-based and pragmatic approach. Int J Womens Health 2010;2:263-77. [PubMed] - Kunz G, Beil D, Huppert P, et al. Adenomyosis in endometriosis--prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. Hum. Reprod 2005;20:2309-16. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Oliveira MAP, Crispi CP, Brollo LC, et al. Surgery in adenomyosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2018;297:581-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Grimbizis GF, Mikos T, Tarlatzis B. Uterus-sparing operative treatment for adenomyosis. Fertil Steril 2014;101:472-87. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Kwack JY, Im KS, Kwon YS. Conservative surgery of uterine adenomyosis via laparoscopic versus laparotomic approach in a single institution. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2018;44:1268-73. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Osada H, Silber S, Kakinuma T, et al. Surgical procedure to conserve the uterus for future pregnancy in patients suffering from massive adenomyosis. Reprod Biomed Online 2011;22:94-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Saremi A, Bahrami H, Salehian P, et al. Treatment of adenomyomectomy in women with severe uterine adenomyosis using a novel technique. Reprod Biomed Online 2014;28:753-60. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Huang X, Huang Q, Chen S, et al. Efficacy of laparoscopic adenomyomectomy using double-flap method for diffuse uterine adenomyosis. BMC Womens Health 2015;15:24. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Takeuchi H, Kitade M, Kikuchi I, et al. Laparoscopic adenomyomectomy and hysteroplasty: a novel method. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2006;13:150-4. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Chong GO, Lee YH, Hong DG, et al. Long-Term Efficacy of Laparoscopic or Robotic Adenomyomectomy with or without Medical Treatment for Severely Symptomatic Adenomyosis. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2016;81:346-52. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Chung YJ, Kang SY, Choi MR, et al. Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Adenomyomectomy for Patients Who Want to Preserve Fertility. Yonsei Med J 2016;57:1531-4. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Shim JI, Jo EH, Kim M, et al. A comparison of surgical outcomes between robot and laparoscopy-assisted adenomyomectomy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e15466. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Carter JE. Surgical treatment for chronic pelvic pain. JSLS 1998;2:129-39. [PubMed] - Palomba S, Zupi E, Falbo A, et al. A multicenter randomized, controlled study comparing laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy: reproductive outcomes. Fertil Steril 2007;88:933-41. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, et al. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:1091-5. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Mowers EL, Lim CS, Skinner B, et al. Prevalence of Endometriosis During Abdominal or Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Chronic Pelvic Pain. Obstet Gynecol 2016;127:1045-53. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Lamvu G. Role of hysterectomy in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:1175-8. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Brandsborg B, Nikolajsen L, Hansen CT, et al. Risk factors for chronic pain after hysterectomy: a nationwide questionnaire and database study. Anesthesiology 2007;106:1003-12. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, Peterson HB. The effectiveness of hysterectomy for chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:941-5. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Hartmann KE, Ma C, Lamvu GM, et al. Quality of life and sexual function after hysterectomy in women with preoperative pain and depression. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:701-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Stovall TG, Ling FW, Crawford DA. Hysterectomy for chronic pelvic pain of presumed uterine etiology. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:676-9. [PubMed] - Farquhar CM, Harvey SA, Yu Y, et al. A prospective study of 3 years of outcomes after hysterectomy with and without oophorectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:711-7. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Magtibay PM, Magrina JF. Ovarian remnant syndrome. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49:526-34. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Nezhat F, Nezhat C. Operative laparoscopy for the treatment of ovarian remnant syndrome. Fertil Steril 1992;57:1003-7. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Magtibay PM, Nyholm JL, Hernandez JL, et al. Ovarian remnant syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:2062-6. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Lemos N, Possover M. Laparoscopic approach to intrapelvic nerve entrapments. J Hip Preserv Surg 2015;2:92-8. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Possover M, Andersson KE, Forman A. Neuropelveology: An Emerging Discipline for the Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain. Int Neurourol J 2017;21:243-6. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Possover M. Use of the LION procedure on the sensitive branches of the lumbar plexus for the treatment of intractable postherniorrhaphy neuropathic inguinodynia. Hernia 2013;17:333-7. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Kale A, Basol G, Usta T, et al. Laparoscopic evaluation of female pelvic neuroanatomy and autonomic plexuses in terms of gynecologic perspective. J Endometr Pelvic Pain Disord 2018;10:216-21. [Crossref] - Doyle JB. Paracervical uterine denervation by transection of the cervical plexus for the relief of dysmenorrhea. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1955;70:1-16. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Daniels JP, Middleton L, Xiong T, et al. Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized evidence to assess the effectiveness of laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation in chronic pelvic pain. Hum Reprod Update 2010;16:568-76. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Daniels J, Gray R, Hills RK, et al. Laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation for alleviating chronic pelvic pain: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2009;302:955-61. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Johnson NP, Farquhar CM, Crossley S, et al. A double-blind randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation for women with chronic pelvic pain. BJOG 2004;111:950-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Chen FP, Chang SD, Chu KK, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic presacral neurectomy and laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation for primary dysmenorrhea. J Reprod Med 1996;41:463-6. [PubMed] - Nezhat CH, Seidman DS, Nezhat FR, et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic presacral neurectomy for the treatment of central pelvic pain attributed to endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:701-4. [PubMed] - Candiani GB, Fedele L, Vercellini P, et al. Presacral neurectomy for the treatment of pelvic pain associated with endometriosis: a controlled study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:100-3. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Zullo F, Palomba S, Zupi E, et al. Effectiveness of presacral neurectomy in women with severe dysmenorrhea caused by endometriosis who were treated with laparoscopic conservative surgery: a 1-year prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:5-10. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Hasson HM. Electrocoagulation of pelvic endometriotic lesions with laparoscopic control. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979;135:115-21. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Palomba S, Zupi E, Falbo A, et al. Presacral neurectomy for surgical management of pelvic pain associated with endometriosis: a descriptive review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2006;13:377-85. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Chen FP, Soong YK. The efficacy and complications of laparoscopic presacral neurectomy in pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:974-7. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Latthe PM, Proctor ML, Farquhar CM, et al. Surgical interruption of pelvic nerve pathways in dysmenorrhea: a systematic review of effectiveness. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;86:4-15. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Possover M, Chiantera V, Baekelandt J. Anatomy of the Sacral Roots and the Pelvic Splanchnic Nerves in Women Using the LANN Technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2007;17:508-10. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Possover M, Schneider T, Henle KP. Laparoscopic therapy for endometriosis and vascular entrapment of sacral plexus. Fertil Steril 2011;95:756-8. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Siquara De Sousa AC, Capek S, Amrami KK, et al. Neural involvement in endometriosis: Review of anatomic distribution and mechanisms. Clin Anat 2015;28:1029-38. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Possover M, Baekelandt J, Flaskamp C, et al. Laparoscopic neurolysis of the sacral plexus and the sciatic nerve for extensive endometriosis of the pelvic wall. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2007;50:33-6. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Chiantera V, Petrillo M, Abesadze E, et al. Laparoscopic Neuronavigation for Deep Lateral Pelvic Endometriosis: Clinical and Surgical Implications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2018;25:1217-23. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Possover M, Lemos N. Risks, symptoms, and management of pelvic nerve damage secondary to surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a report of 95 cases. Int Urogynecol J 2011;22:1485-90. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Possover M. Laparoscopic management of neural pelvic pain in women secondary to pelvic surgery. Fertil Steril 2009;91:2720-5. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Lemos N, Marques RM, Kamergorodsky G, et al. Vascular entrapment of the sciatic plexus causing catamenial sciatica and urinary symptoms. Int Urogynecol J 2016;27:317-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Possover M, Forman A. Pelvic Neuralgias by Neuro-Vascular Entrapment: Anatomical Findings in a Series of 97 Consecutive Patients Treated by Laparoscopic Nerve Decompression. Pain Physician 2015;18:E1139-43. [PubMed] - Kale A, Basol G, Usta T, et al. Vascular Entrapment of Both the Sciatic and Pudendal Nerves Causing Persistent Sciatica and Pudendal Neuralgia. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2019;26:360-1. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Maleux G, Stockx L, Wilms G, et al. Ovarian vein embolization for the treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome: long-term technical and clinical results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000;11:859-64. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Liddle AD, Davies AH. Pelvic congestion syndrome: chronic pelvic pain caused by ovarian and internal iliac varices. Phlebology 2007;22:100-4. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Beard RW, Kennedy RG, Gangar KF, et al. Bilateral oophorectomy and hysterectomy in the treatment of intractable pelvic pain associated with pelvic congestion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991;98:988-92. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Soysal ME, Soysal S, Vıcdan K, et al. A randomized controlled trial of goserelin and medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of pelvic congestion. Hum Reprod 2001;16:931-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] - Chung MH, Huh CY. Comparison of treatments for pelvic congestion syndrome. Tohoku J Exp Med 2003;201:131-8. [Crossref] [PubMed] Cite this article as: Yilmaz S, Topbas Selcuki NF, Usta T, Kale A. Minimally invasive surgery in pelvic pain: from a gynecological perspective. Gynecol Pelvic Med 2021;4:5.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (2)

Cited by (1)

References (3)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK