Diagnostic Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasound for Detecting Pelvic Adhesions and Predicting Surgical Time in Benign Gynecologic Surgery
Transvaginal ultrasound's sliding sign accurately detects pelvic adhesions and predicts longer operative times in benign gynecologic surgery, with a history of laparotomy increasing adhesion risk.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This prospective blinded diagnostic accuracy study evaluated transvaginal ultrasound measures (retrocervical and high sliding signs, adnexal mobility, and peritoneal pseudocysts) in 202 patients scheduled for benign laparoscopic gynecologic surgery, using laparoscopic findings as the reference standard and analyzing operative time. The retrocervical sliding sign showed the best diagnostic performance for Pouch of Douglas (POD) obliteration, with sensitivity 65%, specificity 96%, and accuracy 93.5%, while adnexal mobility tests had moderate sensitivity (53–64%) but high specificity (>90%) and the high sliding sign had low sensitivity (16%) with high specificity (95%). Negative sliding signs were associated with longer operative time (139 vs 60 minutes), and POD obliteration was strongly linked to chronic pelvic pain, infertility, and deep infiltrating endometriosis (p < .01); a history of laparotomy was also a significant risk factor for adhesions. The paper does not explicitly state additional limitations beyond reporting its prospective, blinded design and the single-center setting. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it reports a strong association between POD obliteration/adhesions on laparoscopy and deep infiltrating endometriosis.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
2,416 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-12T06:13:51.797165+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-20T00:30:09.899782+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-11T08:34:28.763810+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine