How women view postepisiotomy pain

BMJ · 1982 · vol. 284(6321) , pp. 1042 · doi:10.1136/bmj.284.6321.1042 · W4249734547
article OA: bronze CC0
📄 Open PDF View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-13

This study assessed pain levels and recovery in 101 primiparous women following episiotomy, finding high pain intensity and persistent issues at three months to inform postpartum patient education.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Episiotomy is one of the most commonly performed operative procedures and yet little information is available on the subjective reactions in the puerperium to this procedure. The present study was designed to furnish information on the attitudes of patients, levels of pain, and of course recovery by studying a consecutive series of 101 Caucasian primiparea who received episiotomies at delivery. Women were interviewed within 24 hours of delivery and then, at three months after delivery, com- pleted a questionnaire. The high level of pain experienced was noteworthy. Labour pain and episiotomy pain were uncorrelated, indicating the importance of distinguishing between them. Several women were experiencing problems at the three-month follow-up, with some attributing these to the episiotomy repair. The data are presented in the framework of providing women in the postpartum period with systematic information on the nature of postepisiotomy pain and subsequent recovery to facilitate their adjustment.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

References (9)

Source provenance

crossref
last seen: 2026-05-15T01:00:12.858190+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK