Cardenolides May Affect Herbivory on Milkweeds (Asclepiasspp.) by the Root-Knot NematodeMeloidogyne incognita

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,737 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Root-knot nematodes (RKNs) of the genus Meloidogyne are important pests in agriculture. RKNs are generalist herbivores with a wide host range including crop and wild plants. The latter are an important source of defensive metabolites that may be helpful for RKN management. Milkweeds (Asclepias spp.) produce toxic cardenolides that protect them from herbivory. However, it is unclear if cardenolides may defend milkweeds against RKNs. Here, we tested this directly through herbivory assays with the RKN M. incognita on milkweed species that produce negligible and high levels of cardenolides, A. tuberosa and A. curassavica, respectively. We found that M. incognita induces fewer galls on A. curassavica than A. tuberosa and fails to reproduce after reaching maturity on the former but not the latter species. This suggests that the predominantly polar cardenolides in A. curassavica may engender long-term reproductive toxicity. Further toxicity assays with the polar cardenolide ouabain showed that cardenolides can also have more immediate toxic effects on M. incognita at higher concentrations. Ouabain caused a coiled, paralytic phenotype in juvenile RKNs, a sign of neurotoxicity, leading to lethality in a subset of RKNs. Some nematodes recovered upon ouabain removal, confirming that neurotoxic cardenolides have a nematostatic effect that results in death when exposure persists. Taken together, our results provide further evidence that cardenolides may function as anti-herbivore defenses against RKNs. The ‘dead end’ host plant A. curassaviva appears to possess useful properties that may be leveraged for control of RKNs in agriculture. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00