Recovering Attached Crude Oil from Hydrodesulfurization Waste Catalyst
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
As environmental awareness grows, hydrodesulfurization (HDS) catalysts have become crucial in petroleum refining, yet their use results in oil-laden waste that poses environment risks and complicates subsequent treatment. Efficient oil removal is thus critical for processing spent catalysts. This study systematically compares three de-oiling methods: extraction, chemical thermal washing, and pyrolysis, to identify the optimal de-oiling method. In the experiments, the extraction achieves 94.12% oil removal rate at a liquid-to-solid ratio of 10 mL/g and 45℃ in 60 minutes, maintaining around 90% efficiency after five cycles of solvent recovery. The chemical thermal washing achieves oil removal rate of 96.26% after 4 hours at 90℃, with 0.15 wt.% SDS, 3.0 wt.% NaOH, and a liquid-to-solid ratio of 10 mL/g. The heavy oil emulsion is then decomposed with 4% CuO and 5% H2O2. The pyrolysis method removes 96.19% of oil at 600℃ in 60 minutes. While the extraction and chemical thermal washing methods are effective, they produce wastewater, raising environmental concerns. In contrast, the pyrolysis method is more environmentally friendly. SEM, EDS, and FT-IR analyses show that after oil removal, the metal structures on the alumina support of the spent HDS catalyst are clearly exposed, facilitating the subsequent recovery of valuable metals.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00