A trans -piRNA network and transcriptional antagonism shape piRNA cluster function

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

PIWI-interacting (pi)RNAs protect animal germlines from transposable elements (TEs) by guiding their sequence-specific repression. In Drosophila germline, piRNAs are encoded in distinct genomic regions, piRNA clusters (piCs), that are transcribed by a non-canonical machinery that is anchored on chromatin by the HP1 paralogue Rhino. Studies of transgenic piCs revealed that piRNA biogenesis depends on cytoplasmic inheritance of piRNAs, however, whether native piCs require trans-generational piRNA transmission remained unknown. Here, we used two approaches to show that cytoplasmic inheritance of cognate piRNAs is critical for piRNA biogenesis. Our analyses reveal that individual piCs form a tightly interconnected network linked by trans -acting piRNAs that reinforce biogenesis. According to the transposon trap model, the content of piCs is updated by integration of novel TEs leading to production of piRNA guides against integrated transposons. However, we found that transcription driven by promoters integrated into piCs disrupt local piRNA biogenesis by removing Rhino and antagonizing non-canonical transcription of piRNA precursors. Thus, newly inserted transposons might suppress piRNA production before they become domesticated by the piRNA pathway calling for a revision of the trap model. Together, our results reveal that piC activity is shaped by transcriptional competition and a dynamic interplay between individual piCs connected into a common network. Highlights Cytoplasmic inheritance of maternal piRNAs is required for piRNA biogenesis in the next generation Trans -acting piRNA ensure robustness of piRNA biogenesis and repression by connecting individual clusters into a functional network Ping-pong amplification provides non-uniform processing of different regions inside piCs Genes can remain active inside piRNA clusters antagonizing Rhino-dependent non-canonical transcription and piRNA biogenesis, challenging the transposon trap model
Full text 2,056 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract PIWI-interacting (pi)RNAs protect animal germlines from transposable elements (TEs) by guiding their sequence-specific repression. In Drosophila germline, piRNAs are encoded in distinct genomic regions, piRNA clusters (piCs), that are transcribed by a non-canonical machinery that is anchored on chromatin by the HP1 paralogue Rhino. Studies of transgenic piCs revealed that piRNA biogenesis depends on cytoplasmic inheritance of piRNAs, however, whether native piCs require trans-generational piRNA transmission remained unknown. Here, we used two approaches to show that cytoplasmic inheritance of cognate piRNAs is critical for piRNA biogenesis. Our analyses reveal that individual piCs form a tightly interconnected network linked by trans-acting piRNAs that reinforce biogenesis. According to the transposon trap model, the content of piCs is updated by integration of novel TEs leading to production of piRNA guides against integrated transposons. However, we found that transcription driven by promoters integrated into piCs disrupt local piRNA biogenesis by removing Rhino and antagonizing non-canonical transcription of piRNA precursors. Thus, newly inserted transposons might suppress piRNA production before they become domesticated by the piRNA pathway calling for a revision of the trap model. Together, our results reveal that piC activity is shaped by transcriptional competition and a dynamic interplay between individual piCs connected into a common network. Highlights Cytoplasmic inheritance of maternal piRNAs is required for piRNA biogenesis in the next generation Trans-acting piRNA ensure robustness of piRNA biogenesis and repression by connecting individual clusters into a functional network Ping-pong amplification provides non-uniform processing of different regions inside piCs Genes can remain active inside piRNA clusters antagonizing Rhino-dependent non-canonical transcription and piRNA biogenesis, challenging the transposon trap model Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00