Deep Learning-Based 3D and 2D Approaches for Skeletal Muscle Segmentation on Low-Dose CT Images

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

This paper studied automated skeletal muscle segmentation on low-dose CT by systematically comparing 2D and 3D deep learning architectures, specifically DeepLabv3+ and UNet3+, trained and evaluated on 534 low-dose CT scans using an anatomically standardized L3 level approach with preprocessing, L3 slice selection, and region-of-interest extraction. Performance was assessed with Dice similarity coefficient and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance, where DeepLabv3+ achieved the highest accuracy (DSC 0.982 ± 0.010; HD95 1.04 ± 0.46 mm) and UNet3+ delivered competitive results (DSC 0.967 ± 0.013; HD95 1.27 ± 0.58 mm) using far fewer parameters and lower inference time. A major caveat is that the evaluation is centered on the single L3 vertebral level, using a curated dataset, so results may not generalize to other anatomical sites or imaging settings. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 12,760 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Deep Learning-Based 3D and 2D Approaches for Skeletal Muscle Segmentation on Low-Dose CT Images | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Deep Learning-Based 3D and 2D Approaches for Skeletal Muscle Segmentation on Low-Dose CT Images Giuseppe Timpano, Pierangelo Veltri, Patrizia Vizza, Giuseppe Lucio, and 1 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6786492/v2 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 2 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Show more versions Abstract Automated segmentation of skeletal muscle from computed tomography (CT) images is essential for large-scale quantitative body composition analysis. However, manual segmentation is time-consuming and impractical for routine or high-throughput use. This study presents a systematic comparison of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) deep learning architectures for segmenting skeletal muscle at the anatomically standardized level of the third lumbar vertebra (L3) in low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans. We implemented and evaluated the DeepLabv3+ (2D) and UNet3+ (3D) architectures on a curated dataset of 534 LDCT scans, applying preprocessing protocols, L3 slice selection, and region of interest extraction. The model performance was evaluated using a comprehensive set of evaluation metrics, including Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95). DeepLabv3+ achieved the highest segmentation accuracy (DSC = 0.982 ± 0.010, HD95 = 1.04 ± 0.46 mm), while UNet3+ showed competitive performance (DSC = 0.967 ± 0.013, HD95 = 1.27 ± 0.58 mm) with 26 times fewer parameters (1.27 million vs. 33.6 million) and lower inference time. Both models exceeded or matched results reported in the recent CT-based muscle segmentation literature. This work offers practical insights into architecture selection for automated LDCT-based muscle segmentation workflows, with a focus on the L3 vertebral level, which remains the gold standard in muscle quantification protocols. Biomedical Engineering Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Skeletal muscle Deep Learning LDCT Segmentation UNet DeepLab Full Text Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 2 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Show more versions Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6786492","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":465626340,"identity":"fcebbd6c-c8aa-4cc6-ac52-79ffb72531f4","order_by":0,"name":"Giuseppe Timpano","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6417-6561","institution":"Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, Magna Graecia University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Giuseppe","middleName":"","lastName":"Timpano","suffix":""},{"id":465626341,"identity":"2ebb7dd3-8e87-49dc-9145-fc88f8306d3d","order_by":1,"name":"Pierangelo Veltri","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2494-0294","institution":"DIMES, University of Calabria","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Pierangelo","middleName":"","lastName":"Veltri","suffix":""},{"id":465626342,"identity":"d079c7ef-4934-4bd5-ab98-baadc863d695","order_by":2,"name":"Patrizia Vizza","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0014-478X","institution":"Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, Magna Graecia University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Patrizia","middleName":"","lastName":"Vizza","suffix":""},{"id":487736561,"identity":"c0046276-29c0-401d-8a21-e8e87440e9d4","order_by":3,"name":"Giuseppe Lucio","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0332-2606","institution":"Cascini","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Giuseppe","middleName":"","lastName":"Lucio","suffix":""},{"id":487736562,"identity":"42308d76-b3f3-4f2e-916f-0ff11b1e3b62","order_by":4,"name":"Francesco","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Manti","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"","middleName":"","lastName":"Francesco","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-05-30 16:45:54","currentVersionCode":2,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6786492/v2","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6786492/v2","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":88135851,"identity":"328e6733-1bc6-4e9f-b1de-186628b215f9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-08-01 21:45:59","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":669844,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Sarcopenia2025.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6786492/v2_covered_286cfa6a-127e-4aeb-89c1-2a3f3e883391.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eDeep Learning-Based 3D and 2D Approaches for Skeletal Muscle Segmentation on Low-Dose CT Images\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"Magna Graecia University","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Skeletal muscle, Deep Learning, LDCT Segmentation, UNet, DeepLab","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6786492/v2","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6786492/v2","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eAutomated segmentation of skeletal muscle from computed tomography (CT) images is essential for large-scale quantitative body composition analysis. However, manual segmentation is time-consuming and impractical for routine or high-throughput use. This study presents a systematic comparison of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) deep learning architectures for segmenting skeletal muscle at the anatomically standardized level of the third lumbar vertebra (L3) in low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe implemented and evaluated the DeepLabv3+ (2D) and UNet3+ (3D) architectures on a curated dataset of 534 LDCT scans, applying preprocessing protocols, L3 slice selection, and region of interest extraction. The model performance was evaluated using a comprehensive set of evaluation metrics, including Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95). DeepLabv3+ achieved the highest segmentation accuracy (DSC = 0.982 ± 0.010, HD95 = 1.04 ± 0.46 mm), while UNet3+ showed competitive performance (DSC = 0.967 ± 0.013, HD95 = 1.27 ± 0.58 mm) with 26 times fewer parameters (1.27 million vs. 33.6 million) and lower inference time.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBoth models exceeded or matched results reported in the recent CT-based muscle segmentation literature. This work offers practical insights into architecture selection for automated LDCT-based muscle segmentation workflows, with a focus on the L3 vertebral level, which remains the gold standard in muscle quantification protocols.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Deep Learning-Based 3D and 2D Approaches for Skeletal Muscle Segmentation on Low-Dose CT Images","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":2,"date":"2025-07-31 18:16:27","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6786492/v2","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}},{"code":1,"date":"2025-06-03 05:40:23","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6786492/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"70b86cee-20d0-4517-ad5d-48e57de33412","owner":[],"postedDate":"July 31st, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":52522370,"name":"Biomedical Engineering"},{"id":52522371,"name":"Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-08-01T21:38:20+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-07-31 18:16:27","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v2","identity":"rs-6786492","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6786492","identity":"rs-6786492","version":["v2"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00