Comparison of robotic and conventional laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy for large uterus using da Vinci Xi system: A propensity score matching analysis
other
OA: closed
public-domain-us
AI-generated summary
Robotic single-site hysterectomy for large uteri demonstrated a lower complication rate compared to the conventional approach, though with a longer exhaust time.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The robotic surgical system equipped with enhanced visualization, flexible instruments, tremor filtration, and improved ergonomics can greatly address difficulties encountered in conventional laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. This study aimed to evaluate whether robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery performed by da Vinci Xi system was an optimal approach in performing benign hysterectomy for large uterus.
METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Between May 2021 and September 2023, patients who underwent transumbilical single-site hysterectomy with or without da Vinci Xi system indicated for uterine myoma or adenomyosis with uterine weight exceeding 280 g were enrolled. After conducting propensity score matching to balance the baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: After 1:1 propensity score matching, 74 patients were included in each group. No patient required additional ports, conversion to laparotomy or multi-port laparoscopy. The robotic group showed significantly longer exhaust time (2.4 ± 0.7 vs 2.0 ± 0.7 days, p < 0.001) and lower postoperative complication rate (4.1 % vs 13.5 %, p = 0.042) compared to the conventional group. No significant differences were found in operative time (183.6 ± 53.6 vs 178.2 ± 55.4 min, p = 0.546), blood loss (100.0 vs 50.0 mL, p = 0.296) and intraoperative complication (1.4 % vs 0, p = 1.000) even though the robotic group had heavier uterine weights (412.5 vs 394.0 g) and a higher rate of severe adhesion (33.8 % vs 17.6 %).
CONCLUSION: Robotic and conventional laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy for large uterus were both feasible and safe with satisfying surgical outcomes. However, the laparoendoscopic single-site surgery was easier to be mastered and more likely to handle challenging conditions with assistance of da Vinci Xi system.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-20T06:14:18.781669+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-06-20T06:11:25.920785+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-11T08:34:28.763810+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine