⚙
AI-generated deep summary
by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-15
· read from full text
ⓘ
The paper uses an agent-based model of raccoon populations in simulated urban-suburban landscapes to study whether raccoon rabies virus can be eliminated with oral rabies vaccination (ORV) thresholds below the commonly targeted 60% seroprevalence, whether below-target vaccination landscapes are vulnerable to recolonization after elimination, and how the rate/timing of immigration affects these dynamics. Vaccination and immigration rates jointly influenced elimination probability, with elimination more likely and faster at higher vaccination rates and less likely at higher immigration rates, while all immigration variables increased recolonization probability (higher immigration rate and immigrant prevalence) but reduced it when immigration occurred seasonally rather than continuously. Vaccination did not clearly affect recolonization probability, though it reduced the number of rabies cases during recolonization events; a caveat noted is that elimination was highly likely largely because the simulated landscapes were small in spatial extent. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Abstract
The raccoon variant of the rabies virus (RRV) is managed in the eastern United States and Canada via distribution of oral rabies vaccine (ORV) baits. The goal of ORV distribution is to reach seroprevalence rates (an index of population immunity) of at least 60%, the threshold thought to eliminate RRV. Seroprevalence rates in urban areas rarely reach target levels, predictably leading to rabies outbreaks. However, many urban areas have spent several years rabies-free, aligning with previous work suggesting RRV can be eliminated from urban areas at below-target seroprevalence rates. Using an agent-based model to simulate raccoon populations in urban landscapes, we examined 1) whether RRV can be eliminated at vaccination thresholds below 60% and 2) whether landscapes with below-target vaccination rates are vulnerable to RRV recolonization, and 3) whether the rate and timing of immigration influences elimination and recolonization. Vaccination and immigration rates influenced elimination probability: elimination was more likely and occurred more quickly in landscapes with higher vaccination rates and less likely in landscapes with higher immigration rates. All immigration variables (immigration rate, immigrant disease prevalence, and immigration timing) influenced the probability of recolonization after rabies was eliminated: recolonization was more likely in landscapes with high immigration rates and when immigrants had higher disease prevalence, but less likely when immigration occurred seasonally rather than continuously. Vaccination did not have a clear effect on recolonization probability but reduced the number of rabies cases during a recolonization event. Although elimination was highly likely in our simulated landscapes due to their small spatial extent, our results suggest that vaccination rates of at least 50% result in timely rabies elimination (median 1.5 years). After elimination is achieved, strategies for preventing infected individuals from entering the rabies-free area are essential for preventing recolonization events, as vaccination rates had a much smaller effect on recolonization that immigration rates and timing. Understanding long-distance movements of host individuals is crucial for managing diseases such as rabies which likely persist at the regional scale.
Full text
3,134 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.
You must log in to post a comment.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.
Add a Comment
You must log in to post a comment.
Comments
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
The raccoon variant of the rabies virus (RRV) is managed in the eastern United States and Canada via distribution of oral rabies vaccine (ORV) baits. The goal of ORV distribution is to reach seroprevalence rates (an index of population immunity) of at least 60%, the threshold thought to eliminate RRV. Seroprevalence rates in urban areas rarely reach target levels, predictably leading to rabies outbreaks. However, many urban areas have spent several years rabies-free, aligning with previous work suggesting RRV can be eliminated from urban areas at below-target seroprevalence rates. Using an agent-based model to simulate raccoon populations in urban landscapes, we examined 1) whether RRV can be eliminated at vaccination thresholds below 60% and 2) whether landscapes with below-target vaccination rates are vulnerable to RRV recolonization, and 3) whether the rate and timing of immigration influences elimination and recolonization. Vaccination and immigration rates influenced elimination probability: elimination was more likely and occurred more quickly in landscapes with higher vaccination rates and less likely in landscapes with higher immigration rates. All immigration variables (immigration rate, immigrant disease prevalence, and immigration timing) influenced the probability of recolonization after rabies was eliminated: recolonization was more likely in landscapes with high immigration rates and when immigrants had higher disease prevalence, but less likely when immigration occurred seasonally rather than continuously. Vaccination did not have a clear effect on recolonization probability but reduced the number of rabies cases during a recolonization event. Although elimination was highly likely in our simulated landscapes due to their small spatial extent, our results suggest that vaccination rates of at least 50% result in timely rabies elimination (median 1.5 years). After elimination is achieved, strategies for preventing infected individuals from entering the rabies-free area are essential for preventing recolonization events, as vaccination rates had a much smaller effect on recolonization that immigration rates and timing. Understanding long-distance movements of host individuals is crucial for managing diseases such as rabies which likely persist at the regional scale.
https://doi.org/10.32942/X22K9H
Life Sciences
raccoon rabies, urban ecology, Immigration, rabies management, agent-based models, landscape ecology
Published: 2025-06-03 19:15
Last Updated: 2025-06-06 15:18
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Data and Code Availability Statement:
Data and code for this work will be made available on Zenodo upon publication of the manuscript.
Language:
English
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.