A systematic review of laboratory investigations into the pathogenesis of avian influenza viruses in wild avifauna of North America

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,724 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT The lack of consolidated information regarding wild bird species’ response to avian influenza virus (AIV) infection is a challenge for conservation managers, researchers, and related sectors such as public health and commercial poultry. Such information could be used to model complex disease dynamics within communities, prioritize species for surveillance and conservation efforts, or identify species more likely to facilitate spillover into domestic animals or humans. Using two independent searches, we reviewed published literature for studies describing wild bird species experimentally infected with avian influenza to assess host species’ relative susceptibility to AIVs. Additionally, we summarized broad-scale parameters for elements such as shedding duration and minimum infectious dose that can be used in transmission modeling efforts. Our synthesis documented that waterfowl (i.e., Anatidae) comprise the vast majority of published AIV pathobiology studies, whereas gulls and passerines were less represented in research despite evidence that they also are susceptible and contribute to high pathogenicity avian influenza disease dynamics. This study represents the first comprehensive effort to compile available literature regarding the pathobiology of AIV’s in all wild birds in over a decade. This database provides an opportunity to critically examine and assess what is known and identify where further insight is needed. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Changes reflect peer review at the journal of submission. We have added information to the database to expand inference, as well as added plots to the figure to improve interpretation.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00