Modelling Anaerobic Co-Digestion with Agricultural Feedstock: Model Validation and Cross-Reactor Verification

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,790 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract As the United Kingdom (UK) targets net-zero emissions by 2050, anaerobic digestion (AD) has become a cornerstone of renewable energy infrastructure. However, mathematical models, such as the Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1), often struggle with high-solids agricultural feedstocks because they rely on Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), a metric that introduces significant experimental error. To overcome this, this study applies an established mass-based ADM1 framework tailored for the co-digestion of maize silage and cow manure sourced from a UK AD site. This study uses a parallel reactor framework, using two identical laboratory-scale reactors to physically replicate the dynamic conditions of the full-scale site. A Global Sensitivity Analysis was first conducted, identifying biomass decay and carbohydrate breakdown rates as the most influential factors affecting system stability and model accuracy. The model was calibrated using data from the first reactor and then tested against an independent second reactor subjected to significant organic loading stress. Results show high predictive capabilities, with the model achieving a R2 of 0.81 for biogas production during calibration. The model maintained high predictive accuracy during the validation test of the second physical twin, achieving an R2 of 0.85, proving that the framework is robust and not overfitted to a single dataset. While predicting rapid fluctuations in pH and alkalinity remains challenging, the mass-based approach effectively forecasts gas yields and process stability. This methodology provides a reliable foundation for robust process modelling, offering a scalable tool for the UK biogas sector to optimise AD. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00