A comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy

other OA: closed public-domain-us
View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13

Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy resulted in shorter hospital stays and less postoperative pain than total abdominal hysterectomy, with similar blood loss and costs.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The goal of this study was to compare laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) with total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). We performed a prospective comparison of the hospital courses of 30 women, 15 undergoing LAVH and 15 undergoing TAH, in a teaching hospital setting. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used, with statistical evaluation of differences by Student's t-test for normally distributed data and Kruskal-Wallis for data with dissimilar variances. Fourteen of fifteen patients scheduled for LAVH had their surgery completed without need of a laparotomy. In the LAVH group, (1) mean surgical time was 50 minutes longer, (2) blood loss, complications, and hospital costs were not statistically different, (3) hospital days averaged 1 1/2 less, and (4) postoperative pain ratings and medication requirements were significantly decreased, compared with the TAH group. In many cases, LAVH may be reasonably performed instead of an indicated TAH.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Hysterectomy Laparoscopy Cost-Benefit Analysis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Humans Hysterectomy Hysterectomy Hysterectomy Length of Stay Pain Measurement Pelvis Postoperative Complications Prospective Studies Tissue Adhesions Tissue Adhesions Tissue Adhesions Uterine Diseases

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-17T06:13:18.893374+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:11:29.222973+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine