Anatomical and surgical insights for hypogastric nerves preservation during pelvic retroperitoneal dissection
This study dissected female pelves to identify hypogastric nerve anatomical relationships and found significant right-left differences, suggesting an interfascial approach for nerve preservation during pelvic surgery.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
The paper studied the anatomical relationship between hypogastric nerves and pelvic anatomical landmarks, and assessed right–left differences, using detailed pelvic retroperitoneal dissections. In 5 nulliparous embalmed cadavers and 10 nulliparous women undergoing in vivo laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid endometriosis (without parametrial infiltration or radical hysterectomy), the closest distances between the hypogastric nerves and ureters, as well as distances relative to midline planes and uterosacral ligaments, were documented on both hemipelvis. Hypogastric nerves were identified bilaterally in all specimens, but substantial anatomical variability was observed; notably, the right hypogastric nerve was farther from the ureter relationship-wise and closer to the midsagittal plane than the left, with additional side-specific differences relative to mid-cervical plane and uterosacral ligaments. The authors emphasize that variability limits generalization and argue that an interfascial approach could support nerve-sparing surgery, while this remains grounded in specific surgical contexts. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it reports in vivo laparoscopic dissections in women undergoing surgery for rectosigmoid endometriosis and frames the nerve-sparing pelvic retroperitoneal anatomy in that operative setting.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
2,081 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00