Tubal selection for gamete intrafallopian transfer
other
OA: closed
public-domain-us
AI-generated summary
In a retrospective analysis of 144 GIFT procedures, transferring gametes to the tube ipsilateral to the dominant ovary yielded a significantly higher pregnancy rate than transferring to the contralateral tube.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
When both fallopian tubes appear normal, tubal selection for GIFT is left to the surgeon's discretion. We were interested to learn whether pregnancy rates were influenced by the choice of tubal transfer in relation to ovarian dominance. Ovarian dominance was defined sonographically as the ovary containing the greater number of follicles having a mean diameter > 16 mm. In a retrospective analysis of 144 GIFT procedures, the clinical pregnancy rate for transfers performed to the tube ipsilateral to the dominant ovary was significantly higher than that of transfers made to the contralateral tube (0.414 versus 0.228, P = 0.042). This difference could not be attributed to either patient characteristics or cycle performance. We suggest that gamete transfer be performed ipsilateral to the side with the greater number of dominant follicles to optimize pregnancy rates.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-20T06:14:18.781669+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:11:29.222973+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine