Predator activity, proactive anti-predator strategies, and nesting phenology produce a dynamic landscape of risk to tundra goose reproduction

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Birds generally rely on proactive anti-predator strategies when selecting nest sites, as they have limited options to adapt to changing levels of risk once incubation begins. Arctic waterfowl often nest colonially as an anti-predator strategy but dispersed-breeding species may use other proactive strategies, such as nesting in less risky areas. However, empirical links between spatial patterns of predation risk and nest habitat selection or success are needed to better understand how predator activity shapes Arctic waterfowl reproduction. Using activity data from the main cursorial nest predators, Arctic and red foxes (Vulpes lagopus, V. vulpes), and activity data from aerial predators, we evaluate the influence predator activity has on Canada goose (Branta canadensis interior) nest habitat selection and success, and how nesting phenology mediates these effects. By comparing habitat selection models fit to i) goose nest locations and ii) fox locations obtained from GPS-collars, we show that geese and foxes display nearly opposite patterns of selection for the same landscape traits. Geese selected sites that appeared to minimize their probability of encountering foxes while also maximizing their ability to detect foxes. Spatial predictions of fox activity revealed nests located in areas with higher probability of fox use had lower nest success, indicating fox space-use patterns reflect predation risk. Nests initiated earlier had a greater probability of nest success, but these patterns strongly depended on location; the benefits of nesting early were largely lost in areas of high fox activity. We also found a negative relationship between clutch size and incubation date, suggesting nests incubated later had higher rates of failure likely due, in part, to geese being in poorer body condition. Although nest success was lower in areas with high aerial predator activity, fox activity likely has a greater influence on goose nest spatial patterns due largely to movement constraints imposed by tundra landscape features on foxes but not aerial predators. Our study demonstrates the mechanisms by which nesting phenology and predator activity interact to shape bird reproduction, and provides an empirical demonstration of the value of incorporating temporal dynamics into the “landscape of fear” framework.
Full text 3,077 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Birds generally rely on proactive anti-predator strategies when selecting nest sites, as they have limited options to adapt to changing levels of risk once incubation begins. Arctic waterfowl often nest colonially as an anti-predator strategy but dispersed-breeding species may use other proactive strategies, such as nesting in areas perceived to be safer. However, empirical links between spatial patterns of predation risk and nest habitat selection or success are needed to better understand how predator activity shapes Arctic waterfowl reproduction. Using activity data from the main cursorial nest predators, Arctic and red foxes (Vulpes lagopus, V. vulpes), and aerial predators, we evaluate the influence predator activity has on Canada goose (Branta canadensis interior) nest habitat selection and success, and how nesting phenology mediates these effects. We compared habitat selection models fit to i) goose nest locations and ii) fox locations obtained from GPS collars and found that geese and foxes display nearly opposite patterns of selection for the same landscape traits. Geese selected sites that minimized their probability of encountering foxes while also maximizing their ability to detect foxes. Spatial predictions of fox activity revealed nests located in areas with higher probability of fox use had lower nest success, indicating fox space-use patterns reflect predation risk. Landscape heterogeneity influenced both fox and goose nest habitat selection patterns and, consequently, spatial variation in predation risk and reproductive success. Aerial predators appeared to have a lesser effect on spatial patterns of goose nest habitat selection and success. Spatial patterns of nest success were, however, strongly influenced by nesting phenology. Nests initiated earlier had a greater probability of successfully hatching, but these patterns depended on location; the benefits of nesting early decreased in areas of high fox activity. Our study demonstrates the mechanisms by which nesting phenology, predator activity, and landscape heterogeneity interact to shape bird reproduction, and provides an empirical demonstration of how our understanding of predation risk is enhanced by integrating both spatial and temporal dynamics. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X2DK87 Subjects Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Life Sciences

Keywords

anti-predator behavior, Arctic fox, Canada goose, landscape of fear, movement ecology, nest success, predation risk, predator-prey interactions Dates Published: 2024-06-14 20:08 Last Updated: 2025-04-29 06:27 Older Versions License CC-BY Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Additional Metadata Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Data and Code Availability Statement: All data and R code associated with this study will be permanently archived in the figshare data repository upon acceptance. Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00