EEG Signatures of Auditory Distraction: Neural Responses to Spectral Novelty in Real-World Soundscapes

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,640 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract In everyday life, ambient sounds can disrupt our concentration, interfere with task performance, and contribute to mental fatigue. Even when not actively attended to, salient or changing sounds in the environment can involuntarily divert attention. Understanding how the brain responds to these real-world auditory distractions is essential for evaluating the cognitive consequences of environmental noise. In this study, we recorded electroencephalography (EEG) while participants performed different tasks during prolonged exposure to a complex urban soundscape. We identified naturally occurring, acoustically salient events and analyzed the corresponding event-related potentials (ERPs). Auditory spectral novelty reliably elicited a P3a response (250–350 ms), reflecting robust attentional capture by novel environmental sounds. In contrast, the Reorienting Negativity (RON) window (450–600 ms) showed no consistent modulation, possibly due to the continuous and largely behaviorally irrelevant nature of the soundscape. Performance in a behavioral task was briefly disrupted following novel sounds, underscoring the functional impact of attentional capture. Noise sensitivity, measured via the Weinstein Noise Sensitivity Scale (WNSS; 1978), was not associated with ERP amplitudes. Together, these findings demonstrate that the P3a component provides a stable neural marker of attentional shifts in naturalistic contexts and highlight the utility of spectral novelty detection as a tool for investigating auditory attention outside the laboratory. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00