Endoscopic versus laparatomy management of endometriomas
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 4 in-corpus citations
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed
this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is
available through Endo Lab. The
publisher
is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional
access, use "Find at my library".
AI-generated summary
This paper compares outcomes of endoscopic versus laparotomy management for endometriomas.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (4)
- Randomized clinical trial of two laparoscopic treatments of endometriomas: cystectomy versus drainage and coagulation 1998
- Effects of 3 month therapy with danazol after laparoscopic surgery for stage III/IV endometriosis: a randomized study 1999
- How long does laparoscopic surgery really take? Lessons learned from 1000 operative laparoscopies 1999
- Infertility — the role of minimally invasive surgery 1995
Cited by (4)
- Effects of 3 month therapy with danazol after laparoscopic surgery for stage III/IV endometriosis: a randomized study 1999
- How long does laparoscopic surgery really take? Lessons learned from 1000 operative laparoscopies 1999
- Randomized clinical trial of two laparoscopic treatments of endometriomas: cystectomy versus drainage and coagulation 1998
- Infertility — the role of minimally invasive surgery 1995
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK