In vitro assessment of the osteogenic and antibacterial capabilities of Mg-MOF particles with encapsulated levofloxacin within polydopamine

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 135,300 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
In vitro assessment of the osteogenic and antibacterial capabilities of Mg-MOF particles with encapsulated levofloxacin within polydopamine | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article In vitro assessment of the osteogenic and antibacterial capabilities of Mg-MOF particles with encapsulated levofloxacin within polydopamine Wei Xiong, Yuxiang Zhou, Yuyi Li, Yifeng Yuan, Kang Liu, Xudong Huang, and 4 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5846374/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 23 Jul, 2025 Read the published version in Scientific Reports → Version 1 posted 8 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Infectious bone defect is a condition where infection and bone defect occur simultaneously. The simultaneous achievement of effective antimicrobial management and enhanced bone regeneration continues to present a major hurdle in musculoskeletal therapeutics. To address these limitations, we have developed a novel osteoconductive material, this material (PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV) consists of Magnesium-based metal-organic frameworks (Mg-MOF) particles loaded with the antibiotic levofloxacin (LEV) and coated with polydopamine (PDA), which integrates photothermal therapy with antibiotic delivery to combat bacterial drug resistance and facilitate bone tissue regeneration. Under near-infrared (NIR) irradiation, PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles demonstrate superior antibacterial efficacy and enhanced osteogenic potential. Drug release studies indicate that NIR irradiation significantly increases LEV release by 337% and Mg ions release by 196% compared to standard conditions. Furthermore, in vitro antibacterial assays confirm that NIR irradiation markedly enhances the antibacterial activity of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles, achieving inhibition rates of 97.5 ± 1.45% against Escherichia coli ( E. coli ) and 98.5 ± 2.27% against Staphylococcus aureus ( S. aureus ). The photothermal therapy mediated by NIR irradiation not only enhances antibacterial efficacy but also directly stimulates osteogenic differentiation and calcium deposition in mBMSCs, positioning PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV as a multi-modal therapeutic platform for infective osteogenesis. Physical sciences/Materials science/Nanoscale materials/Nanoparticles Biological sciences/Drug discovery/Drug delivery Mg-MOF osteogenic antibacterial levofloxacin polydopamine Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Introduction In the realm of orthopedic medicine, the management of extensive osseous defects precipitated by infections remains a formidable clinical challenge [ 1 – 3 ] . The employment of osteoconductive materials for repairing these defects represents an emerging therapeutic strategy [ 4 – 5 ] . However, the majority of conventional bone repair materials are deficient in antimicrobial properties, making them prone to bacterial colonization post-implantation. Furthermore, many of these materials are biologically inert, exhibiting limited osteoinductive potential, which hampers the restoration and regeneration of infected bone defects [ 6 – 7 ] . Due to poor blood supply in bone defect regions, systemic antibiotics rarely reach the bactericidal level required at the infection site. To prevent postoperative infection, doctors often administer high - dose antibiotics [ 8 ] . But this risks severe toxicity and upsurges in antibiotic resistance. So, developing bone repair materials that can eliminate bacteria, control infection, and facilitate bone regeneration is critically important for infected bone defect treatment [ 9 – 10 ] . The advancement of material science has led to the emergence of various materials, including MXene, carbon dots, metal oxides, and metal-organic frameworks (MOF), in the treatment and repair of bone infections [11–12] . MOF constitute a family of crystalline porous materials with tunable periodic dimensional architectures (1D-3D), formed through coordination between metal clusters and polydentate organic linkers. Their structural merits—including unsaturated metal sites, programmable porosity, and exceptional surface areas—endow enhanced drug-loading capacity and controlled release kinetics for antimicrobials in osseous environments [ 13 ] . Particularly, Magnesium-based metal-organic frameworks (Mg-MOF) particles emerge as emerging bioceramic carriers, demonstrating dual therapeutic superiority: (i) excellent biocompatibility, and (ii) Mg ions-mediated upregulation of osteogenic gene expression (e.g., RUNX2, OCN) critical for infected bone regeneration. At the site of bone infection, the presence of bacterial biofilms makes bacteria more tolerant to antibiotics, disinfectants, and the host immune system. This weakens the effect of drug - laden particles and makes treatment more complex and challenging [14] . Photothermal therapy (PTT), as an innovative antimicrobial modality, offers the benefits of ease of clinical application, strong controllability, and non-invasiveness [ 15 – 16 ] . PTT operates on the principle of physical antimicrobial action, utilizing near-infrared (NIR) light to excite photothermal materials, converting light energy into heat energy that elevates local temperatures [17] . This process leads to protein denaturation, intracellular protein leakage, and ultimately, the thermal ablation of cancer cells or bacterial demise. Importantly, this heating mechanism is effective against both planktonic bacteria and biofilms, inactivating microorganisms without the concern for drug resistance [ 18 ] . The development of Mg-MOF drug-laden particles with photothermal properties is expected to tackle the two problems of bacterial drug resistance and bone tissue regeneration in infected bone defects. In this study, the synthesis of the Mg-MOF particles was performed by the antibiotic levofloxacin (LEV), and polydopamine (PDA) coating applied to the Mg-MOF-LEV particles to obtain the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles (Fig. 1 A). NIR irradiation of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles not only accelerated LEV release but also generated heat that disrupted surrounding bacterial biofilms, enhancing the bactericidal effect of antibiotics. Additionally, the thermal effect increased the release rate of magnesium ions, further augmenting the osteogenic differentiation and mineralization of mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (mBMSCs) induced by PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles (Fig. 1 B). The study's findings underscore the promising antimicrobial and osteoanabolic effects of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles, highlighting their potential in the repair of infected bone defects. Materials and methods Materials Magnesium chloride hexahydrate (MgCl 2 •6H 2 O, 99%), gallic acid (99%), levofloxacin (LEV, 98%), dopamine (DA, 98%), potassium hydroxide (KOH, 99%), and sodium hydroxide were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., The DAPI/PI staining kit, CCK-8 assay kit, and AM/PI universal immunofluorescence reagent kit were obtained from Wuhan Yakein Biotechnology Co., Ltd. DMEM was sourced from Beijing Sofibio Technology Co., Ltd., while fetal bovine serum was acquired from American Trade Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (mBMSCs) purchased from Wuhan Pronosel Life Science & Technology Co., Ltd. All the chemicals are ready to use without further purification. Preparation of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles Firstly, 2 g of MgCl₂•6H₂O and 7.6 g of gallic acid were mixed in a beaker containing 100 mL of deionized water, and stirred magnetically (300 rpm for 30 minutes at 20°C). Then, an aqueous KOH solution (10 M) was added until the pH reached 10, as monitored by a pH meter. The mixture was transferred to a hydrothermal synthesis reactor and heated at 120°C for 24 hours. After cooling to room temperature, light-gray Mg-MOF particles were obtained via ultrahigh-speed centrifugation (10,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 20°C). These particles were washed three times with deionized water and dried at 60°C [ 19 – 20 ] . Next, the pellets were immersed in an aqueous LEV solution (10 mg/mL) and stirred magnetically for six hours before high-speed centrifugation (10,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 20°C). The supernatant was collected to measure absorbance at 294 nm using a microplate reader; drug loading capacity was calculated as previously described. The Mg-MOF-LEV particles were washed three times with deionized water and lyophilized overnight. To prepare PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles, we combined 500 mg each of DA and Mg-MOF-LEV particles in 100 mL of deionized water while stirring magnetically for one hour. NaOH was added to adjust the pH to approximately ten before stirring continued for another twenty-four hours. The resulting precipitate was collected via high-speed centrifugation (10,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 20°C), rinsed three times with deionized water and ethanol respectively, followed by freeze-drying to yield PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles. Structural and morphological characterization of sample particles The surface morphology and structure of Mg-MOF, Mg-MOF-LEV, and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV samples were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy were employed to characterize the chemical composition of LEV, Mg-MOF, Mg-MOF-LEV, DA, and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV. The nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of Mg-MOF and Mg-MOF-LEV were measured with a porosity analyzer, enabling calculation of specific surface area via the BET method and pore size distribution via the BJH method. Evaluation of photothermal properties of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV nanoparticles PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles were immersed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH7.4), then irradiated with an NIR laser source (808 nm, 2.0 W cm − 2 ) for 10 minutes while temperature values were recorded every 30 seconds. The photothermal cycling tests were performed to evaluate the stability of the composite scaffolds, and the photothermal images were captured using infrared thermography. Mg ions and LEV release assay of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles Cumulative release assay of Mg ions and LEV Place 100 mg of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles in 10 mL of PBS (pH 7.4) and let the solution sit undisturbed at room temperature for 84 hours. During this period, centrifuge the solution every 12 hours (2500 rpm, 5 minutes), collect 10 mL of the supernatant, and then add 10 mL of fresh PBS to continue the soaking process. Repeat this until the experiment ends. Measure the LEV release in the collected supernatant using HPLC and determine the Mg ion concentration using ICP. Photothermal intervention release detection of Mg ions and LEV Weigh 100 mg of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles and immerse them in 10 mL of PBS (pH 7.4). Continuously stir the solution at room temperature at 100 rpm. For the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV + NIR group, start NIR (808 nm, 2.0 W cm − 2 ) laser irradiation at the 10-minute mark. During the experiment, centrifuge the soaking solution every 10 minutes (2500 rpm, 5 minutes), then remove 1 mL of the supernatant and add 1 mL of fresh PBS to the beaker to maintain a constant solution volume. Repeat this until the experiment ends. Use HPLC to measure the LEV release in the collected supernatants and ICP to determine the Mg ion concentration. In vitro antibacterial experiments Experimental bacterial selection and setup of experimental groups Staphylococcus aureus ( S. aureus ), a typical Gram-positive bacterium, and Escherichia coli ( E. coli ), a representative Gram-negative bacterium, were selected as model organisms in this study to evaluate the antibacterial activity of certain particles. The experimental design comprised five groups: Control, Mg-MOF, Mg-MOF-LEV, PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV, and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV + NIR. Bacterial Staining with DAPI/PI In the initial stage of the experiment, all group samples were subjected to a rigorous disinfection process. This procedure consisted of two main steps. First, the samples were immersed in 75% ethanol for a duration of 30 minutes. This was followed by exposure to ultraviolet (UV) irradiation for an additional 30 minutes. Following disinfection, 20 mg of the sterilized samples were carefully introduced into 2 mL of bacterial suspension containing either S. aureus or E. coli at a concentration of 1×10^8 CFU/mL. The samples were then co-cultured with the bacteria for a period of 12 hours under appropriate conditions to allow for interaction between the samples and the bacteria. The Control group was co-cultured with a PBS solution and bacterial suspension, while the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV + NIR group was subjected to NIR (808 nm, 2.0 W cm − 2 ) laser irradiation for 10 minutes. Post co-culture, samples were centrifuged to isolate bacteria, which were then diluted. A staining solution (0.1 µL PI, 0.1 µL DAPI, and 100 µL detection buffer) was added to 1 mL of the bacterial solution and incubated for 30 minutes in the dark. After centrifugation to remove the staining solution, bacteria were washed three times with PBS. The stained bacteria were then transferred to a glass slide for observation under an inverted fluorescence microscope (CKX53, Olympus). Colony Count Analysis Following sterilization, 20 mg of samples were added to 2 mL of S. aureus or E. coli suspension (1×10^8 CFU/mL) for a 12-hour co-culture. The Control group was co-cultured with PBS and bacterial suspension, and the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV + NIR group received NIR (808 nm, 2.0 W cm − 2 ) laser irradiation for 10 minutes. After centrifugation, the supernatant was removed and 1 mL of PBS was diluted, subsequently the dilution solution was applied evenly in the culture plate and the colony number was observed after 12 h incubation in the bacterial incubator. Plate colony photos were collected with a camera to collect data and record the number of colonies. Finally, we calculated the antibacterial rate according to the following formula (Eq. (1)): Antibacterial rate = (CFU control – CFU experimental )/CFU control ×100% (1) where CFU Control was represents the number of viable bacteria in the control group. This serves as the baseline for comparison, CFU Experimental : was represents the number of viable bacteria remaining after treatment with the different groups. Crystal Violet Staining for Biofilm Assessment Crystal violet staining was employed to evaluate the particles' ability to inhibit biofilm formation. Sterilized samples (20 mg) were added to 96-well plates, followed by 100 µL of either S. aureus or E. coli suspension (1×10^8 CFU/mL) for a 24-hour co-culture. The Control group was co-cultured with PBS and bacterial suspension, and the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV + NIR group was irradiated with a NIR (808 nm, 2.0 W cm − 2 ) laser for 10 minutes. After staining with crystal violet for 60 minutes in the dark, the biofilm's staining was observed under a microscope, and the samples' destructive effect on the biofilm was assessed. For quantitative analysis of biofilm staining, the stained biofilms of each group samples were washed into centrifuge tubes using glacial acetic acid, and then the absorbance of the wash solution at 570 nm was subsequently collected using a microplate reader. In vitro cell experiments Preparation of Cell Culture Medium and Osteogenic Induction Solution In this experiment, mBMSCs were selected as the experimental cell type for this study. And the cell culture medium was composed of 10% premium-grade fetal bovine serum, 89% high-glucose DMEM, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (PS). For the alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and alizarin red s (ARS) experiments, an osteogenic induction solution was utilized. This solution included ascorbic acid, β-glycerophosphate, and dexamethasone at concentrations of 50 µg/mL, 10 mM, and 10 nM respectively. Preparation of Particle Extracts Five experimental groups were established: control, Mg-MOF, Mg-MOF-LEV, PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV, and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV + NIR. The preparation of the Mg-MOF extract is as follows: After sterilization, 200 mg of Mg-MOF was soaked in a centrifuge tube containing 10 mL of cell culture medium and then transferred to a cell culture incubator for 24 hours of undisturbed incubation. After the incubation, the centrifuge tube was centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 5 minutes, and the supernatant, used as the particulate extract, was collected for subsequent cell culture. The pellet extraction procedures for the Mg-MOF-LEV and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV groups were identical to that of the Mg-MOF group. For the control group, we only took 10 mL of cell culture medium (composed of 10% premium fetal bovine serum, 89% high - glucose DMEM, and 1% penicillin - streptomycin), placed it in a cell incubator, and let it sit undisturbed for 24 hours without any additional treatment or interference. After 24 hours, the culture medium was directly collected and used for the cell culture of the control group. In the preparation of extracts for the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV + NIR group, particles were subjected to NIR (808 nm, 2.0 W cm − 2 ) intervention for ten minutes during their preparation; all other steps followed the protocol used for obtaining extracts from the Mg-MOF group. Biocompatibility Test First, each well of a 96 - well cell culture plate was filled with 150 µL of cell suspension at 10,000 cells/mL. After a 24-hour incubation period, the culture medium was replaced with fresh pellet extraction solution to continue the cultivation process. Then, at 24 - and 72 - hour intervals, cells were stained with a live/dead assay kit and observed under a fluorescence microscope to evaluate morphology, with green and red fluorescence indicating live and dead cells respectively. Cell Proliferation Analysis Each well of a 96 - well cell culture plate was filled with 150 µL of cell suspension (10,000 cells/mL). After 24 hours of initial culture, the medium was replaced with fresh particulate extract to support further cell growth. To assess cell proliferation at 24 hours or 72 hours post - treatment, a CCK − 8 assay was used. The steps were as follows: 10% CCK − 8 solution was added to the culture medium, followed by a 1 - hour reaction. The reaction mixture was then transferred into an automatic enzyme labeling instrument for measurement reader for measurement; absorbance (OD) values were recorded at a wavelength of 450 nm. ALP and ARS staining Each well of a 6 - well cell culture plate was filled with 3 mL of cell suspension (10,000 cells/mL). After 24 - hour incubation for cell attachment, the medium was replaced with fresh particulate extract and osteogenic induction solution to continue cell culture. Following 14 days of incubation, the medium was aspirated from the wells, and a fixation solution was added to each well for 30 minutes to fix the cells. Post-fixation, the cells were rinsed with PBS solution (pH 7.4) to remove the fixative. Next, 500 µL of either Alizarin Red S (ARS) or Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) staining solution was applied to the wells for a staining period of 60 minutes. Finally, after the staining procedure, the staining solution was aspirated, and any residual dye was washed away using PBS solution (pH 7.4). The results from the ARS and ALP staining were then observed under a microscope. And the experimental results of each group were subjected to data extraction and analysis using ImageJ Version 1.54. Immunofluorescence staining In a 24 - well cell culture plate, 1 mL of cell suspension (10,000 cells/mL) was added and incubated for 24 hours. After 24 hours, the initial culture medium was replaced with particulate extract from each group, and cultured for another day. On day 3, the particulate extract was removed from the 24 - well plate, and immunofluorescence staining was carried out. Cells were fixed, permeabilized, and blocked, then incubated with primary and secondary antibodies in turn. Finally, antibody fluorescence was detected with a fluorescence microscope to analyze the location and expression level of the target protein. And the experimental results of each group were subjected to data extraction and analysis using ImageJ Version 1.54. For detailed procedures, please refer to this article [ 21 ] . qRT-PCR In addition to the aforementioned experiments, this study employed quantitative real-time PCR technology to assess the expression of osteogenesis-related genes in mBMSCs. At the start, mBMSCs were cultured for 7 days under identical conditions. Then, mRNA was extracted from cells using column - purification. Subsequently, the extracted mRNA was converted into cDNA using the TakaraBrisript First - Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit. This study used a SYBR Green kit for qRT - PCR detection and the 2 - ΔΔCt method to measure the relative expression of mRNA. Statistical analysis In this experiment, we used a statistically standard expression for all the collected quantitative data, namely that each set of data was presented in the form of mean ± standard deviation (mean ± SD). To ensure the reliability of our findings, each in vitro study was conducted with three replicate groups, with each group being tested three times. The statistical analysis of the data was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the aid of SPSS software, version 25.0. The significance of differences in the numerical data was set at a threshold of p < 0.05. Results and Discussion SEM analysis Mg-MOF has garnered significant attention due to its high specific surface area, substantial porosity, and tunable chemical functionality. Owing to its unique coordination characteristics, Mg-MOF particles belonging to the hexagonal crystal system readily adopt various morphologies during synthesis, including stalk-like, spindle-like, shell-like, and square shapes [22] . The synthesized sample particles' microstructure was analyzed via SEM. As shown in Fig. 2 A-C, the Mg-MOF particles mainly display a stalk-like morphology, consistent with prior researchers' descriptions [ 23 ] . Furthermore, the morphology of Mg-MOF-LEV particles is largely consistent with that of Mg-MOF particles, indicating that the incorporation of LEV does not compromise the structural integrity of Mg-MOF. In contrast, PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles manifest as tightly clustered aggregates where PDA effectively consolidates numerous individual particles. XRD analysis To gain deeper insights into the chemical composition of the synthesized sample particles, XRD analyses were performed on each sample group. As shown in Fig. 2 D, the XRD pattern of Mg-MOF has sharp diffraction peaks at 2θ of 11.8° and 18.1°, attributed to the (300) and (510) crystal planes [25] . These peaks are in agreement with previously reported data. Additionally, LEV exhibits sharp characteristic peaks at 2θ values of 6.5°, 9.7°, 13.1°, 15.7°, 19.3°, 19.9°, and 26.6°, confirming its crystalline nature [ 26 ] . However, it is noteworthy that the diffraction peak associated with LEV is present in the XRD pattern of Mg-MOF-LEV samples. This could be attributed to LEV being encapsulated within the Mg-MOF framework or its relatively low concentration. Furthermore, the LEV-related diffraction peaks are undetectable in the XRD spectra of the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles. This alteration is likely a result of the coating effect of PDA on Mg-MOF-LEV. Moreover, the XRD spectra of PDA did not show any obvious characteristic peaks, completely without the intensity of the diffraction peaks associated with LEV in the XRD spectra of the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV sample. This change may be a result of the coating effect of PDA on Mg-MOF-LEV. FTIR analysis In this study, FTIR was employed to investigate component interactions within PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles. As shown in Fig. 2 E, the levofloxacin spectrum reveals characteristic peaks indicative of C-F stretching vibrations at 1250 cm⁻¹, C = O stretching vibrations at 1620 cm⁻¹, and O-H stretching vibrations at 3433 cm⁻¹. The spectrum for Mg-MOF indicates an observable peak related to Mg-O vibrations at 581 cm⁻¹ [ 26 ] . In contrast, within MG-MOF-LEV particle spectra there is a shift in this vibration from 581 cm⁻¹ to 592 cm⁻¹, alongside confirmation of levofloxacin’s C = O stretching vibration appearing at approximately 1620 cm⁻¹ [ 27 ] . This shift in magnesium oxide vibrational frequency coupled with new appearances confirms successful loading of LEV into Mg-MOF-LEV structures. The characteristic peaks of PDA FTIR spectra did not intersect with the Mg-MOF-LEV characteristic peaks, while the spectra obtained in the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV sample belonging to the Mg-MOF-LEV particles disappeared, a phenomenon may be related to the encapsulation of PDA. BET analysis The specific surface area and average pore size of the Mg-MOF particles were 65.487 m²g − 1 and 15.18 nm, respectively, which were measured by the BET method (Fig. 2 F). The porous structure and large specific surface area are conducive to efficient drug loading [28–29] . After the LEV loading was completed, the specific surface area and average pore size of the Mg-MOF-LEV particles were 17.647 m²g − 1 and 5.01 nm, which showed a significant decrease compared to the Mg-MOF particles, indicating that the LEV drug loading was successful. Based on the decrease in the LEV concentration in the solution, we calculated the drug loading ratio of LEV to be 43.07%. Photothermal performance analysis Figure 3 A illustrates the schematic representation of NIR laser intervention on PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles in this study. Figure 3 B presents the thermal imaging results following NIR intervention across all groups. The findings indicate that the photothermal performance of the Control, Mg-MOF, and Mg-MOF-LEV groups is suboptimal, whereas the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV group demonstrates exceptional photothermal efficacy, achieving a temperature of 50.9°C after 15 minutes of NIR irradiation. Additionally, Fig. 3 C depicts the temperature rise and cooling curves for PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles as observed through thermal imaging. The data reveal that both temperature rise and cooling curves exhibit a progressively smooth trend. Furthermore, an assessment of the photothermal stability of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles was conducted (Fig. 3 D). Notably, their temperature rise curve remained stable after four cycles of NIR laser exposure, underscoring their robust photothermal stability. Mg ions and LEV release detection The average release concentrations of Mg and LEV from PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles are illustrated in Fig. 4 A-B. Initial experimental results indicated a high release of Mg ions and LEV during the first two days, followed by a gradual stabilization, demonstrating sustained release behavior throughout the testing period. Figure 4 C-D show the cumulative release curves for Mg ions and LEV, which gradually flattened. After a 7-day soak, the release amounts reached 1065 µg/mL for Mg ions and 2145 µg/mL for LEV, respectively. The real-time effects of NIR laser irradiation on Mg ions and LEV release are depicted in Fig. 4 E-F. Without NIR intervention, the release rates were relatively slow; after 60 minutes of in vitro soaking, Mg ion concentrations were 30.7 µg/mL, and LEV concentrations were 79.8 µg/mL. In contrast, NIR laser intervention significantly increased these release rates, with Mg ion concentrations reaching 57.7 µg/mL and LEV concentrations reaching 141.5 µg/mL at 60 minutes. These results suggest that NIR laser control over the release behavior of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles is effective. Antibacterial activity S aureus is the main pathogen in bone defect infections [ 30 ] . Levofloxacin, a preferred antibiotic, effectively inhibits or kills this bacterium, curbing infection spread [ 31 ] . In recent years, treatments for bone defects with infection have evolved, featuring surgical, antibiotic, tissue engineering, and biomaterial approaches. Surgery, like debridement and bone resection, removes infected and necrotic tissue [32] . Antibiotics, especially LEV, are essential in treatment, with selection based on sensitivity tests and long-term use as needed. Tissue engineering and biomaterials, such as antimicrobial peptide hydrogels, offer new treatment options, preventing infection and promoting bone regeneration [ 33 ] . Additionally, research is ongoing into treatments targeting the biofilm formed by S. aureus during infections, including biofilm-disrupting drugs and materials to boost antibiotic efficacy [ 34 ] . Despite progress, challenges like persistent infections, biofilm formation, and antibiotic resistance remain. Thus, integrating multiple treatments and tailoring solutions to individual patients is crucial for improving treatment outcomes. To assess the antibacterial effects of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles under NIR irradiation, bacterial colony counts were evaluated using the DAPI staining method and agar diffusion method post-treatment for each group. Figure 5 A shows that no dead bacteria were observed in the Control and Mg-MOF groups, indicating no antibacterial effect from Mg-MOF. However, dead bacteria were observed in the Mg-MOF-LEV, PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV, and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV + NIR groups, with the highest number in the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV + NIR group. As shown in Fig. 6 A, the number of bacterial colonies on the agar plate for the Mg-MOF group was similar to the Control group, showing no antibacterial effects. However, the Mg-MOF-LEV and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV groups showed significantly fewer bacterial colonies than the Mg-MOF group, though some colonies remained. In contrast, the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV + NIR group showed almost no bacterial colonies, indicating a significant antibacterial effect. Figure 6 B reveals that for both E. coli and S. aureus, the antibacterial rate of the Mg-MOF group did not exceed 5%. The antibacterial rates in the Mg-MOF-LEV and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV groups, containing LEV, were significantly enhanced to approximately 85%, due to LEV's potent antibacterial properties. The PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV + NIR group's antibacterial rate further increased to 98.5 ± 2.27% for S. aureus and 97.5 ± 1.45% for E. coli , indicating a synergistic lethal effect between LEV and the photothermal action of NIR irradiation on bacteria. The synergistic antibacterial action of LEV and the photothermal effect exhibited by PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles might be attributed to the fact that under the induction of NIR laser, PDA generates a local high-temperature effect that disrupts the integrity of the bacterial biofilm and disturbs the physiological functions of biological macromolecules, thereby causing bacterial death. More importantly, as the biofilm is a major contributing factor for bacterial drug resistance, disrupting its integrity has an enhancing effect on the antibacterial efficacy of antibiotics. Therefore, we investigated the disruptive effect of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles + NIR intervention on bacterial biofilms. As shown in Fig. 6 C-D, the crystal violet staining results revealed that the Control and Mg-MOF groups maintained a clear and intact biofilm structure, with the dense biofilm remaining undamaged. The biofilms in the Mg-MOF-LEV and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV groups were also hardly disrupted, presenting a relatively intact structure. Nevertheless, after 10 min of near-infrared light irradiation, it could be observed that the biofilms of both S. aureus and E. coli in the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV + NIR group were significantly disrupted, resulting in a considerable loss of biomass. Thus, photothermal therapy demonstrates excellent functionality in eliminating bacterial biofilms. Cell viability of mBMSCs The biocompatibility of bone repair materials is highly necessary for evaluating their further therapeutic applications in the clinical setting. In this experiment, we cultivated mBMSCs with the extractive liquids of particles prepared under different conditions and utilized live/dead fluorescence staining to assess the cytocompatibility of each group of particles (Fig. 7 A). On the 3 days of cultivation, each group of cells exhibited a favorable growth morphology, with almost no dead cells being identified, suggesting that all groups demonstrated excellent biocompatibility. Moreover, compared with the Control group, the quantity of mBMSCs in the remaining groups increased, and the increase was most pronounced in the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV group. Additionally, we employed the CCK-8 method to evaluate the impact of each group on the cellular proliferation of mBMSCs. As depicted in Fig. 7 B, on the first day, there was no significant disparity in the cellular proliferation trend among all groups. However, as the cell culture period was extended to the third day, in contrast to the Control group, the mBMSCs in the Mg-MOF, Mg-MOF-LEV, and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV groups all manifested a proliferation trend ( p < 0.05). Moreover, under the intervention of NIR, the increase trend in the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV + NIR group was the most prominent ( p < 0.05). The experimental results indicate that the Mg ions released by the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV + NIR particles possess the ability to promote cellular proliferation. Furthermore, under the intervention of NIR, due to the increased release of Mg ions, the promotion effect on cellular proliferation is further enhanced. Osteogenic differentiation capacity of mBMSCs Mg ions have been shown to influence not only the proliferation of BMSCs but also to promote their osteogenic differentiation capacity. The concentration of Mg ions is crucial, as previous research has established a close relationship between Mg ion impact on osteoblasts and their concentration [ 35 ] . High concentrations of Mg ions can be toxic to osteoblasts, affecting bone formation rates and hindering bone tissue regeneration [ 36 ] . The proposed mechanism involves Mg ions, as Ca ion antagonists, competing with Ca ions for channels, disrupting the Ca ion balance across cell membranes, and thus impacting the proliferation, differentiation, and mineralization of human BMSCs [37] . However, at appropriate concentrations, Mg ions can enhance osteoblast activity and new bone formation [ 38 ] . Additionally, appropriate Mg ion concentrations have been found to promote the expression of osteogenic markers [ 39 ] . Building on these findings, we investigated the effects of Mg-MOF-LEV particles on the osteogenic differentiation of mBMSCs. ALP staining, a classical method for assessing early osteogenic differentiation, was used to evaluate the impact of bone repair materials on mBMSC osteogenesis [ 40 – 42 ] . Figure 7 C-D show that after 7 days, mBMSCs in the Mg-MOF, Mg-MOF-LEV, and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV groups exhibited higher ALP activity than the Control group ( p 0.05). Notably, the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV + NIR group displayed the strongest ALP activity, with a significant increase compared to the other groups, and this enhancement was statistically significant ( p < 0.05). ARS staining is a commonly employed staining method that is widely utilized in the research of osteoblast differentiation, bone cells, or tissue pathophysiology [43–44] . By virtue of the chromogenic reaction between alizarin red and extracellular calcium nodules to generate a deep red compound, we can assess the late osteogenic differentiation of cells. As shown in Fig. 7 E-F, after culturing mBMSCs with the extractive liquids of each group of particles for 21 days, red calcium deposits emerged in all groups. Notably, compared with the Control group, the red calcium deposits in the Mg-MOF, Mg-MOF-LEV, and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV groups significantly increased ( p < 0.05), indicating that Mg ions can effectively promote the calcification of the cytosol matrix of mBMSCs. Furthermore, the quantity and area of red calcium deposits in the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV + NIR group were the highest among all experimental groups ( p < 0.05), suggesting that the intervention of NIR promotes osteogenic mineralization of cells. IF is an analytical method that uses antibodies marked with fluorescent labels to detect and localize specific antigens within cells [ 45 – 46 ] . In this study, we used IF to assess BMP-2 expression in mBMSCs. As shown in Fig. 8 A-B, the green fluorescence intensity in the Mg-MOF, Mg-MOF-LEV, and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV groups was significantly higher compared to the Control group. As depicted in Fig. 8 A-B, the green fluorescence intensity and coverage area of the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV + NIR group were the highest among all groups, with a statistically significant difference ( p < 0.05). These results are in line with those of other osteogenic experiments. Collectively, they demonstrate that PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles can significantly enhance cellular activity and promote osteogenic differentiation. Moreover, appropriate NIR intervention can further augment this effect. To assess the impact of different particulate extracts on mBMSC osteogenic differentiation, we analyzed multiple osteogenesis - related genes via qRT-PCR. As shown in Fig. 8 C-E, compared with the control group, the expression levels of osteogenesis - related genes (ALP, BMP-2, RUNX2) in the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV + NIR group were significantly elevated ( p < 0.05). These results, consistent with other osteogenic experiments, indicate that PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles can markedly enhance mBMSC osteogenic differentiation, and NIR irradiation further strengthens this effect, possibly due to increased expression of key osteogenic genes. Research focus and future prospects All in all, PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles are promising biomaterials for repairing infectious bone defects with notable clinical potential. PDA, a high-performance photothermal agent, generates local high temperatures under NIR irradiation, triggering controlled LEV release from PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles. This dual photothermal-chemical approach not only directly damages bacterial membranes but also enhances LEV penetration and restores antibiotic sensitivity in resistant bacteria, boosting the antibacterial efficacy of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles. Moreover, these particles effectively combat resistant bacterial infections through combined photothermal-drug synergy and biofilm clearance. Their design aligns with current trends in photothermal-chemical combination therapy research and holds significant promise for clinical application. Conclusion In conclusion, the authors have successfully developed PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV nanoparticles that exhibit remarkable antibacterial and osteogenic properties for the treatment of infected bone defects. These nanoparticles were synthesized by incorporating LEV into Mg-MOF during its formation and subsequently coating them with a layer of PDA, which imparts both PTT effects and antibiotic functionality. The findings demonstrate that PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV nanoparticles facilitate a sustained release of LEV, exhibiting significant antibacterial activity. Furthermore, under NIR irradiation, the LEV release rate from these nanoparticles is enhanced, while they also display excellent photothermal characteristics. This results in an effective disruption of bacterial biofilms and augments their antibacterial efficacy. Additionally, PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV nanoparticles show favorable cytocompatibility with BMSCs, and NIR irradiation further accelerates magnesium ion release from the particles, thereby enhancing the osteogenic potential. Declarations Competing interests All authors confirm that they have no existing conflicts of interest to disclose. Author Contribution Wei Xiong, Yuxiang Zhou and Yuyi Li contributed equally to this work. Conceptualization and writing—original draf preparation, Wei Xiong; Methodology and validation, Yuxiang Zhou; Software and formal analysis, Yifeng Yuan and Kang Liu; Investigation and resources, Xudong Huang, Jingkun Li and Zechen Zhang; Data curation and supervision, Yuyi Li; Writing—review and editing, Xiaolin Shi and Miao'er Li. Acknowledgements This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82074183); Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (No. LZ22H270002); Zhejiang Province Traditional Chinese Medicine Technology Plan Traditional Chinese Medicine Modernization Special Fund (No. 2020ZX009). Data Availability All the data used and/or analyzed in this study can be obtained from the corresponding author upon request. References Wang, X. et al. Activated allograft combined with induced membrane technique for the reconstruction of infected segmental bone defects. Sci . Rep . 14, 12587, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-63202-9 (2024). Yang, X. et al. Management of infected bone defects of the femoral shaft by Masquelet technique: sequential internal fixation and nail with plate augmentation. BMC . MUSCULOSKELETAL . DISORDERS . 25, 552, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07681-x (2024). Jiang, X. et al. Antibiotic-loaded bone cement fixation technique combined with bilateral pectoralis major muscle flaps tension-free management for sternal infection after midline sternotomy. J . Cardiothorac . Surg . 19, 289, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-02749-0 (2024). Hu, X. L. et al. 3D printed multifunctional biomimetic bone scaffold combined with TP-Mg nanoparticles for the Infectious bone defects repair. Small . 20, 2403681, https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202403681 (2024). Xia, D. M. et al. The effect of pore size on cell behavior in mesoporous bioglass scaffolds for bone regeneration. Appl . Mater . Today . 29, 101607, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2022.101607 (2022). Wu, Y. T. et al. Photothermal sensitive nanocomposite hydrogel for infectious bone defects. Bone . Res . 13, 22, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41413-024-00377-x (2025). Huang, L. et al. Advancements in GelMA bioactive hydrogels: strategies for infection control and bone tissue regeneration. Theranostics . 15, 460-493, https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.103725 (2025). Ghaseminejad-Raeini, A. et al. Antibiotic-coated intramedullary nailing managing long bone infected non-unions: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Antibiotics-Basel 13, https://doi.org/ 6910.3390/antibiotics13010069 (2024). Xiong, W. et al. Cofe 2 O 4 nanoparticles coated with mesoporous silica and loaded with naringin and levofloxacin for repair of infectious bone defects. Acs . Appl . Nano . Mater . 7, 21936-21950, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.4c03876 (2024). Keremu, A. et al. 3D printed PLGA scaffold with nano-hydroxyapatite carrying linezolid for treatment of infected bone defects. Biomed . Pharmacother . 172 , 116228, https://doi.org/11622810.1016/j.biopha.2024.116228 (2024). Chandra, D. K., Kumar, A. & Mahapatra, C. Ultrasonic synthesis of Ag@CNT-Based metal-organic framework (MOF) for enhanced synergetic antimicrobial activity against. Jom . -Us . 76, 5626-5642, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-024-06714-z (2024). Chandra, D. K., Kumar, A. & Mahapatra, C. Smart nano-hybrid metal-organic frameworks: Revolutionizing advancements, applications, and challenges in biomedical therapeutics and diagnostics. Hybrid . Adv. 9, 100406, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hybadv.2025.100406 (2025). Bigham, A. et al. MOFs and MOF-Based composites as next-generation materials for wound healing and dressings. Small . 20 (30), e2311903, https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202311903 (2024). Song, T. Y., Duperthuy, M. & Wai, S. N. Sub-optimal treatment of bacterial biofilms. Antibiotics . 5 , 23, https://doi.org/10.3390/Antibiotics5020023 (2016). Liu, H. et al. Nanomaterials-based photothermal therapies for antibacterial applications. Mater Design 233, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112231 (2023). Liu, D. K. et al. Nano Sim@ZIF8@PDA modified injectable temperature sensitive nanocomposite hydrogel for photothermal/drug therapy for peri-implantitis. Carbohyd. Polym. 354, 123327, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2025.123327 (2025). Naskar, A. & Kim, K. S. Friends against the foe: synergistic photothermal and photodynamic therapy against bacterial infections. Pharmaceutics . 15 , 1116, https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15041116 (2023). He, W. et al. Highly efficient photothermal nanoparticles for the rapid eradication of bacterial biofilms. Nanoscale . 13, 13610-13616, https://doi.org/10.1039/d1nr03471e (2021). Wang, B. et al. Regulating the release of Mg-MOF from degradable bone cement by coating Mg-MOF with oxidized dextran/gelatin. New. J. Chem. 47, 18591-18602, https://doi.org/10.1039/d3nj02993j (2023). Wang, B. et al. Multifunctional magnesium-organic framework doped biodegradable bone cement for antibacterial growth, inflammatory regulation and osteogenic differentiation. J. Mater. Chem. B. 11, 2872-2885, https://doi.org/10.1039/d2tb02705d (2023). Xiong, W. et al. Direct osteogenesis and immunomodulation dual function sustained release of naringin from the polymer scaffold. J . Mater . Chem . B . 11, 10896-10907, https://doi.org/10.1039/d3tb01555f (2023). Bao, Z. B., Yu, L. A., Ren, Q. L., Lu, X. Y. & Deng, S. G. Adsorption of CO and CH on a magnesium-based metal organic framework. J. Colloid. Interf. Sci . 353, 549-556, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2010.09.065 (2011). Ge, Y. et al. An Mg-MOFs based multifunctional medicine for the treatment of osteoporotic pain. Mat . Sci . Eng . C-Mater. 129, 112386, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2021.112386 (2021). Xie, S. et al. MOF-74-M (M = Mn, Co, Ni, Zn, MnCo, MnNi, and MnZn) for low-temperature NH3-SCR and in situ DRIFTS study reaction mechanism. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 12, 48476-48485, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c11035 (2020). Hu, J. Q., Chen, Y., Zhang, H. & Chen, Z. X. Controlled syntheses of Mg-MOF-74 nanorods for drug delivery. J. Solid. State. Chem. 294, 121853, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2020.121853 (2021). Schnabel, J., Ettlinger, R. & Bunzen, H. Zn-MOF-74 as pH-Responsive Drug-Delivery System of Arsenic Trioxide. Chemnanomat. 6, 1229-1236, https://doi.org/10.1002/cnma.202000221 (2020). Puppi, D., Piras, A. M., Pirosa, A., Sandreschi, S. & Chiellini, F. Levofloxacin-loaded star poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds by additive manufacturing. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 27, 44, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-015-5658-1 (2016). Feng, Y. F. et al. Antibodies@MOFs: An In Vitro Protective Coating for Preparation and Storage of Biopharmaceuticals. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1805148, https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201805148 (2019). Freund, R., Lächelt, U., Gruber, T., Rühle, B. & Wuttke, S. Multifunctional efficiency: extending the concept of atom economy to functional nanomaterials. Acs Nano . 12, 2094-2105, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b00932 (2018). bdulrehman, T. et al. Advances in the targeted theragnostics of osteomyelitis caused by. Arch . Microbiol . 206 , https://doi.org/28810.1007/s00203-024-04015-2 (2024). Senneville, E. et al. Safety of prolonged high-dose levofloxacin therapy for bone infections. J . Chemotherapy . 19 , 688-693, https://doi.org/10.1179/joc.2007.19.6.688 (2007). Jensen, L. K., Hartmann, K. T., Witzmann, F., Asbach, P. & Stewart, P. S. Bone infection evolution. Injury . 55 , 111826, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2024.111826 (2024). Hu, B. H. et al. Supramolecular hydrogels for antimicrobial therapy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47(18), 6917-6929, https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cs00128f(2018). Ferreira, M. et al. Levofloxacin-loaded bone cement delivery system: Highly effective against intracellular bacteria and biofilms. Int . J . Pharmaceut . 532 , 241-248, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.08.089 (2017). Gu, Y. F. et al. Three-dimensional printed Mg-doped β-TCP bone tissue engineering scaffolds: effects of magnesium ion concentration on osteogenesis and angiogenesis. Tissue . Eng . Regen . Med . 16, 415-429, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-019-00192-0 (2019). Liang, L. X. et al. Stimulation of and osteogenesis by Ti-Mg alloys with the sustained-release function of magnesium ions. Colloid . Surface . B . 197, 111360, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111360 (2021). Hung, C., Chaya, A., Liu, K., Verdelis, K. & Sfeir, C. The role of magnesium ions in bone regeneration involves the canonical Wnt signaling pathway. Acta Biomater. 98, 246-255, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.001 (2019). Chen, Z., Zhang, W., Wang, M., Backman, L. J. & Chen, J. Effects of zinc, magnesium, and iron ions on bone tissue engineering. Acs Biomater. Sci. Eng. 8, 2321-2335 , https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00368 (2022). Zhang, X. et al. A novel magnesium ion-incorporating dual-crosslinked hydrogel to improve bone scaffold-mediated osteogenesis and angiogenesis. Mat . Sci . Eng . C-Mater . 121, 111868, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2021.111868 (2021). Zhao, Y. N. et al. Construction of macroporous magnesium phosphate-based bone cement with sustained drug release. Mater . Design . 200, 109466, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109466 (2021). Qian, G. W. et al. Enhancing bone scaffold interfacial reinforcement through in situ growth of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) on strontium carbonate: Achieving high strength and osteoimmunomodulation. J . Colloid . Interf . Sci . 655, 43-57, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2023.10.133 (2024). An, J. et al. Natural products for treatment of osteoporosis: The effects and mechanisms on promoting osteoblast-mediated bone formation. Life . Sci . 147, 46-58, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2016.01.024 (2016). Li, M. M., Zhao, P. Z., Wang, J. W., Zhang, X. C. & Li, J. Functional antimicrobial peptide-loaded 3D scaffolds for infected bone defect treatment with AI and multidimensional printing. Mater . Horiz . 12, 20-36, https://doi.org/10.1039/d4mh01124d (2025). Liu, Q. et al. Recent advances of osterix transcription factor in osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Front. Cell. Dev. Biol. 8, 601224, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.601224 (2020). Castanheira, E. J. et al. 3D-printed injectable nanocomposite cryogel scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration. Mater . Today . Nano . 28, 100519, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtnano.2024.100519 (2024). Zheng, Y. Y. et al. A programmed surface on polyetheretherketone for sequentially dictating osteoimmunomodulation and bone regeneration to achieve ameliorative osseointegration under osteoporotic conditions. Bioact . Mater . 14, 364-376, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.01.042 (2022). Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 23 Jul, 2025 Read the published version in Scientific Reports → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Accepted 21 Jul, 2025 Editor assigned by journal 14 May, 2025 Editor invited by journal 14 May, 2025 Reviews received at journal 11 Apr, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 11 Apr, 2025 Reviewers invited by journal 09 Apr, 2025 Submission checks completed at journal 01 Apr, 2025 First submitted to journal 23 Mar, 2025 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-5846374","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":440385511,"identity":"60dc9d68-0b1f-4a20-a24e-0da461e0a841","order_by":0,"name":"Wei Xiong","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Zhejiang Chinese Medical University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Wei","middleName":"","lastName":"Xiong","suffix":""},{"id":440385513,"identity":"e29ca870-388a-4d89-8ca1-53ec0a2c6441","order_by":1,"name":"Yuxiang Zhou","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Zhoushan Guanghua Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yuxiang","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhou","suffix":""},{"id":440385515,"identity":"16c227fd-cc48-4233-8dbe-25749345572e","order_by":2,"name":"Yuyi Li","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Zhejiang Chinese Medical University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yuyi","middleName":"","lastName":"Li","suffix":""},{"id":440385516,"identity":"dacfc7f5-b0d8-4263-a2f1-a04bc9a487a1","order_by":3,"name":"Yifeng Yuan","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Second Afffliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yifeng","middleName":"","lastName":"Yuan","suffix":""},{"id":440385518,"identity":"7a57bb71-8be5-43b8-a19b-1d4aebd7bb27","order_by":4,"name":"Kang Liu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Second Afffliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kang","middleName":"","lastName":"Liu","suffix":""},{"id":440385519,"identity":"f36a9cf4-8937-4985-b22a-55e156ecd29e","order_by":5,"name":"Xudong Huang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Zhejiang Chinese Medical University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Xudong","middleName":"","lastName":"Huang","suffix":""},{"id":440385522,"identity":"2c18bc1b-2502-4d50-b498-be69a20aca81","order_by":6,"name":"Jingkun Li","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Zhejiang Chinese Medical University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jingkun","middleName":"","lastName":"Li","suffix":""},{"id":440385524,"identity":"44158e51-32e6-460b-ac0d-20f2ca096755","order_by":7,"name":"Zechen Zhang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Zhejiang Chinese Medical University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Zechen","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhang","suffix":""},{"id":440385526,"identity":"94ec990a-f677-4eeb-9bff-08a3e29d6fb5","order_by":8,"name":"Xiaolin Shi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Second Afffliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Xiaolin","middleName":"","lastName":"Shi","suffix":""},{"id":440385528,"identity":"dca77e93-0908-4b5f-9f95-8c6c6ca058d9","order_by":9,"name":"Miao'er Li","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Second Afffliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Miao'er","middleName":"","lastName":"Li","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-01-17 06:08:05","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5846374/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5846374/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13056-6","type":"published","date":"2025-07-23T15:58:19+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":80281682,"identity":"c65f0450-5085-439b-818f-7bb3d1767c1b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-10 06:03:04","extension":"jpg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":526334,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e(\u003c/strong\u003eA) PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles Schematic diagram of particle synthesis steps. \u003cstrong\u003e(\u003c/strong\u003eB) Under NIR laser intervention PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles release Mg ions and LEV, which play a dual role in promoting bone formation and antibacterial activity.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Fig.1.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5846374/v1/3f21d8a40512e57af117dd16.jpg"},{"id":80281675,"identity":"64621c02-156e-4863-8c8e-43ef302cb1e4","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-10 06:03:04","extension":"jpg","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":399894,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e(A) SEM images of Mg-MOF particle. (B) SEM images of C Mg-MOF-LEV particle. (C) SEM images of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particle. (D) XRD pattern of Mg-MOF, Mg-MOF-LEV and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles. (E) FTIR spectra of LEV, Mg-MOF, Mg-MOF-LEV and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles. (F) N\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e adsorption-desorption isotherms of Mg-MOF and Mg-MOF-LEV particles.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Fig.2.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5846374/v1/7907f1661354c80ade89a0b8.jpg"},{"id":80281680,"identity":"7fa06d85-1ab7-4bda-8942-260ace9cce38","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-10 06:03:04","extension":"jpg","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":180576,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e(A) Schematic diagram of the NIR intervention. (B) The real-time temperature variations of Control, Mg-MOF, Mg-MOF-LEV and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV groups with NIR intervention for 15 mins. (C) The heating up and cooling down irradiation curve of Mg-MOF-LEV particle under 808nm NIR laser (2.0 W cm\u003csup\u003e−2\u003c/sup\u003e) irradiation. (D) Cyclic irradiation curve of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particle under 808nm NIR laser (2.0 W cm\u003csup\u003e−2\u003c/sup\u003e) irradiation for four on/off cycles.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Fig.3.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5846374/v1/2985840123478b55345db815.jpg"},{"id":80281674,"identity":"a556a3f8-8fad-4f12-8c27-c945dd30f31b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-10 06:03:04","extension":"jpg","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":422126,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e(A-B) The release amount of Mg icons and LEV from the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particle at different time points. (C-D) The cumulative release amount of Mg icons and LEV from the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particle. (E-F) The release amount of Mg icons and LEV from the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particle under 808nm NIR laser (2.0 W cm\u003csup\u003e−2\u003c/sup\u003e) irradiation.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Fig.4.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5846374/v1/03672e3a61a5f6b9607a0012.jpg"},{"id":80282525,"identity":"5a2cd762-0176-4e39-94d6-fa48393b394c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-10 06:11:05","extension":"jpg","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":429718,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e(A) The DAPI/PI fluorescence merge images of \u003cem\u003eS. aureus\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e after different group interventions for 12 h.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Fig.5.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5846374/v1/d87ec38f0e0c21b1c20a96cd.jpg"},{"id":80282518,"identity":"89ff4937-2707-4178-a5ce-951dd9f0a7ab","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-10 06:11:04","extension":"jpg","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":1119495,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e(A-B) The agar plate images and Antibacterial rate after different group interventions for 12 h. (C-D) Crystal violet staining and Biofilm biomass of \u003cem\u003eS. aureus\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e after different group interventions for 24 h. (*\u003cem\u003ep \u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt; 0.05)\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Fig.6.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5846374/v1/3360b2128acf8ee74a1b3568.jpg"},{"id":80282955,"identity":"ee7e5d5e-affe-45b6-a49c-6a502d5df824","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-10 06:19:04","extension":"jpg","order_by":7,"title":"Figure 7","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":951210,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eIn vitro osteogenic activity of mBMSCs cultured with extracts from different groups. (A) Live-dead fluorescence assay at 72 hours. (B) CCK-8 proliferation test 24 hours and 72 hours. (C) ALP staining at 7 days. (D) Quantitative analysis of ALP staining results using ImageJ software. (E) ARS staining at 21 days. (F) Quantitative analysis of ARS staining results using ImageJ software. (*\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e \u0026lt; 0.05)\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Fig.7.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5846374/v1/5cfb2dec5105bfa270c52c3b.jpg"},{"id":80281695,"identity":"dfbc1d30-af60-47ff-9edc-6e7dfbe59c8e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-10 06:03:05","extension":"jpg","order_by":8,"title":"Figure 8","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":820115,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e(A) BMP-2 immunofluorescence staining of mBMSCs with extracts from different groups at 7 days. (B) Quantitative analysis of BMP-2 immunofluorescence staining results using ImageJ software. (C-E) Expression of ALP, BMP-2 and RUNX2 genes of mBMSCs measured by qRT-PCR. (*\u003cem\u003ep \u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt; 0.05)\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Fig.8.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5846374/v1/907232ac6cd6b79bea8edf38.jpg"},{"id":87756926,"identity":"45c19348-33bb-4e83-aeb2-87c6a0bbe7e0","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-07-28 16:10:22","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":5942149,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5846374/v1/50251d93-7666-4ea4-ba89-b6e006aee585.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"In vitro assessment of the osteogenic and antibacterial capabilities of Mg-MOF particles with encapsulated levofloxacin within polydopamine","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn the realm of orthopedic medicine, the management of extensive osseous defects precipitated by infections remains a formidable clinical challenge \u003csup\u003e[\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR2\" citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/sup\u003e. The employment of osteoconductive materials for repairing these defects represents an emerging therapeutic strategy \u003csup\u003e[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/sup\u003e. However, the majority of conventional bone repair materials are deficient in antimicrobial properties, making them prone to bacterial colonization post-implantation. Furthermore, many of these materials are biologically inert, exhibiting limited osteoinductive potential, which hampers the restoration and regeneration of infected bone defects \u003csup\u003e[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/sup\u003e. Due to poor blood supply in bone defect regions, systemic antibiotics rarely reach the bactericidal level required at the infection site. To prevent postoperative infection, doctors often administer high - dose antibiotics\u003csup\u003e[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/sup\u003e. But this risks severe toxicity and upsurges in antibiotic resistance. So, developing bone repair materials that can eliminate bacteria, control infection, and facilitate bone regeneration is critically important for infected bone defect treatment\u003csup\u003e[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe advancement of material science has led to the emergence of various materials, including MXene, carbon dots, metal oxides, and metal-organic frameworks (MOF), in the treatment and repair of bone infections \u003csup\u003e[11\u0026ndash;12]\u003c/sup\u003e. MOF constitute a family of crystalline porous materials with tunable periodic dimensional architectures (1D-3D), formed through coordination between metal clusters and polydentate organic linkers. Their structural merits\u0026mdash;including unsaturated metal sites, programmable porosity, and exceptional surface areas\u0026mdash;endow enhanced drug-loading capacity and controlled release kinetics for antimicrobials in osseous environments \u003csup\u003e[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/sup\u003e. Particularly, Magnesium-based metal-organic frameworks (Mg-MOF) particles emerge as emerging bioceramic carriers, demonstrating dual therapeutic superiority: (i) excellent biocompatibility, and (ii) Mg ions-mediated upregulation of osteogenic gene expression (e.g., RUNX2, OCN) critical for infected bone regeneration.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAt the site of bone infection, the presence of bacterial biofilms makes bacteria more tolerant to antibiotics, disinfectants, and the host immune system. This weakens the effect of drug - laden particles and makes treatment more complex and challenging \u003csup\u003e[14]\u003c/sup\u003e. Photothermal therapy (PTT), as an innovative antimicrobial modality, offers the benefits of ease of clinical application, strong controllability, and non-invasiveness \u003csup\u003e[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/sup\u003e. PTT operates on the principle of physical antimicrobial action, utilizing near-infrared (NIR) light to excite photothermal materials, converting light energy into heat energy that elevates local temperatures \u003csup\u003e[17]\u003c/sup\u003e. This process leads to protein denaturation, intracellular protein leakage, and ultimately, the thermal ablation of cancer cells or bacterial demise. Importantly, this heating mechanism is effective against both planktonic bacteria and biofilms, inactivating microorganisms without the concern for drug resistance \u003csup\u003e[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/sup\u003e. The development of Mg-MOF drug-laden particles with photothermal properties is expected to tackle the two problems of bacterial drug resistance and bone tissue regeneration in infected bone defects.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn this study, the synthesis of the Mg-MOF particles was performed by the antibiotic levofloxacin (LEV), and polydopamine (PDA) coating applied to the Mg-MOF-LEV particles to obtain the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eA). NIR irradiation of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles not only accelerated LEV release but also generated heat that disrupted surrounding bacterial biofilms, enhancing the bactericidal effect of antibiotics. Additionally, the thermal effect increased the release rate of magnesium ions, further augmenting the osteogenic differentiation and mineralization of mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (mBMSCs) induced by PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eB). The study's findings underscore the promising antimicrobial and osteoanabolic effects of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles, highlighting their potential in the repair of infected bone defects.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Materials and methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eMaterials\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eMagnesium chloride hexahydrate (MgCl\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026bull;6H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO, 99%), gallic acid (99%), levofloxacin (LEV, 98%), dopamine (DA, 98%), potassium hydroxide (KOH, 99%), and sodium hydroxide were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., The DAPI/PI staining kit, CCK-8 assay kit, and AM/PI universal immunofluorescence reagent kit were obtained from Wuhan Yakein Biotechnology Co., Ltd. DMEM was sourced from Beijing Sofibio Technology Co., Ltd., while fetal bovine serum was acquired from American Trade Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (mBMSCs) purchased from Wuhan Pronosel Life Science \u0026amp; Technology Co., Ltd. All the chemicals are ready to use without further purification.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003ePreparation of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFirstly, 2 g of MgCl₂\u0026bull;6H₂O and 7.6 g of gallic acid were mixed in a beaker containing 100 mL of deionized water, and stirred magnetically (300 rpm for 30 minutes at 20\u0026deg;C). Then, an aqueous KOH solution (10 M) was added until the pH reached 10, as monitored by a pH meter. The mixture was transferred to a hydrothermal synthesis reactor and heated at 120\u0026deg;C for 24 hours. After cooling to room temperature, light-gray Mg-MOF particles were obtained via ultrahigh-speed centrifugation (10,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 20\u0026deg;C). These particles were washed three times with deionized water and dried at 60\u0026deg;C \u003csup\u003e[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNext, the pellets were immersed in an aqueous LEV solution (10 mg/mL) and stirred magnetically for six hours before high-speed centrifugation (10,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 20\u0026deg;C). The supernatant was collected to measure absorbance at 294 nm using a microplate reader; drug loading capacity was calculated as previously described. The Mg-MOF-LEV particles were washed three times with deionized water and lyophilized overnight.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo prepare PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles, we combined 500 mg each of DA and Mg-MOF-LEV particles in 100 mL of deionized water while stirring magnetically for one hour. NaOH was added to adjust the pH to approximately ten before stirring continued for another twenty-four hours. The resulting precipitate was collected via high-speed centrifugation (10,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 20\u0026deg;C), rinsed three times with deionized water and ethanol respectively, followed by freeze-drying to yield PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eStructural and morphological characterization of sample particles\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe surface morphology and structure of Mg-MOF, Mg-MOF-LEV, and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV samples were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy were employed to characterize the chemical composition of LEV, Mg-MOF, Mg-MOF-LEV, DA, and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV. The nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of Mg-MOF and Mg-MOF-LEV were measured with a porosity analyzer, enabling calculation of specific surface area via the BET method and pore size distribution via the BJH method.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eEvaluation of photothermal properties of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV nanoparticles\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles were immersed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH7.4), then irradiated with an NIR laser source (808 nm, 2.0 W cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2\u003c/sup\u003e) for 10 minutes while temperature values were recorded every 30 seconds. The photothermal cycling tests were performed to evaluate the stability of the composite scaffolds, and the photothermal images were captured using infrared thermography.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eMg ions and LEV release assay of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eCumulative release assay of Mg ions and LEV\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003ePlace 100 mg of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles in 10 mL of PBS (pH 7.4) and let the solution sit undisturbed at room temperature for 84 hours. During this period, centrifuge the solution every 12 hours (2500 rpm, 5 minutes), collect 10 mL of the supernatant, and then add 10 mL of fresh PBS to continue the soaking process. Repeat this until the experiment ends. Measure the LEV release in the collected supernatant using HPLC and determine the Mg ion concentration using ICP.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003ePhotothermal intervention release detection of Mg ions and LEV\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWeigh 100 mg of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles and immerse them in 10 mL of PBS (pH 7.4). Continuously stir the solution at room temperature at 100 rpm. For the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;NIR group, start NIR (808 nm, 2.0 W cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2\u003c/sup\u003e) laser irradiation at the 10-minute mark. During the experiment, centrifuge the soaking solution every 10 minutes (2500 rpm, 5 minutes), then remove 1 mL of the supernatant and add 1 mL of fresh PBS to the beaker to maintain a constant solution volume. Repeat this until the experiment ends. Use HPLC to measure the LEV release in the collected supernatants and ICP to determine the Mg ion concentration.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eIn vitro antibacterial experiments\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eExperimental bacterial selection and setup of experimental groups\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eStaphylococcus aureus (\u003cem\u003eS. aureus\u003c/em\u003e), a typical Gram-positive bacterium, and Escherichia coli (\u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e), a representative Gram-negative bacterium, were selected as model organisms in this study to evaluate the antibacterial activity of certain particles. The experimental design comprised five groups: Control, Mg-MOF, Mg-MOF-LEV, PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV, and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;NIR.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eBacterial Staining with DAPI/PI\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the initial stage of the experiment, all group samples were subjected to a rigorous disinfection process. This procedure consisted of two main steps. First, the samples were immersed in 75% ethanol for a duration of 30 minutes. This was followed by exposure to ultraviolet (UV) irradiation for an additional 30 minutes. Following disinfection, 20 mg of the sterilized samples were carefully introduced into 2 mL of bacterial suspension containing either \u003cem\u003eS. aureus\u003c/em\u003e or \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e at a concentration of 1\u0026times;10^8 CFU/mL. The samples were then co-cultured with the bacteria for a period of 12 hours under appropriate conditions to allow for interaction between the samples and the bacteria. The Control group was co-cultured with a PBS solution and bacterial suspension, while the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;NIR group was subjected to NIR (808 nm, 2.0 W cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2\u003c/sup\u003e) laser irradiation for 10 minutes. Post co-culture, samples were centrifuged to isolate bacteria, which were then diluted. A staining solution (0.1 \u0026micro;L PI, 0.1 \u0026micro;L DAPI, and 100 \u0026micro;L detection buffer) was added to 1 mL of the bacterial solution and incubated for 30 minutes in the dark. After centrifugation to remove the staining solution, bacteria were washed three times with PBS. The stained bacteria were then transferred to a glass slide for observation under an inverted fluorescence microscope (CKX53, Olympus).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eColony Count Analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFollowing sterilization, 20 mg of samples were added to 2 mL of \u003cem\u003eS. aureus\u003c/em\u003e or \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e suspension (1\u0026times;10^8 CFU/mL) for a 12-hour co-culture. The Control group was co-cultured with PBS and bacterial suspension, and the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;NIR group received NIR (808 nm, 2.0 W cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2\u003c/sup\u003e) laser irradiation for 10 minutes. After centrifugation, the supernatant was removed and 1 mL of PBS was diluted, subsequently the dilution solution was applied evenly in the culture plate and the colony number was observed after 12 h incubation in the bacterial incubator. Plate colony photos were collected with a camera to collect data and record the number of colonies. Finally, we calculated the antibacterial rate according to the following formula (Eq.\u0026nbsp;(1)):\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAntibacterial rate = (CFU \u003csub\u003econtrol\u003c/sub\u003e \u0026ndash; CFU \u003csub\u003eexperimental\u003c/sub\u003e)/CFU \u003csub\u003econtrol\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026times;100% (1)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ewhere CFU \u003csub\u003eControl\u003c/sub\u003e was represents the number of viable bacteria in the control group. This serves as the baseline for comparison, CFU \u003csub\u003eExperimental\u003c/sub\u003e: was represents the number of viable bacteria remaining after treatment with the different groups.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eCrystal Violet Staining for Biofilm Assessment\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eCrystal violet staining was employed to evaluate the particles' ability to inhibit biofilm formation. Sterilized samples (20 mg) were added to 96-well plates, followed by 100 \u0026micro;L of either \u003cem\u003eS. aureus\u003c/em\u003e or \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e suspension (1\u0026times;10^8 CFU/mL) for a 24-hour co-culture. The Control group was co-cultured with PBS and bacterial suspension, and the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;NIR group was irradiated with a NIR (808 nm, 2.0 W cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2\u003c/sup\u003e) laser for 10 minutes. After staining with crystal violet for 60 minutes in the dark, the biofilm's staining was observed under a microscope, and the samples' destructive effect on the biofilm was assessed. For quantitative analysis of biofilm staining, the stained biofilms of each group samples were washed into centrifuge tubes using glacial acetic acid, and then the absorbance of the wash solution at 570 nm was subsequently collected using a microplate reader.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eIn vitro cell experiments\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003ePreparation of Cell Culture Medium and Osteogenic Induction Solution\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn this experiment, mBMSCs were selected as the experimental cell type for this study. And the cell culture medium was composed of 10% premium-grade fetal bovine serum, 89% high-glucose DMEM, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (PS). For the alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and alizarin red s (ARS) experiments, an osteogenic induction solution was utilized. This solution included ascorbic acid, β-glycerophosphate, and dexamethasone at concentrations of 50 \u0026micro;g/mL, 10 mM, and 10 nM respectively.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec17\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003ePreparation of Particle Extracts\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFive experimental groups were established: control, Mg-MOF, Mg-MOF-LEV, PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV, and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;NIR. The preparation of the Mg-MOF extract is as follows: After sterilization, 200 mg of Mg-MOF was soaked in a centrifuge tube containing 10 mL of cell culture medium and then transferred to a cell culture incubator for 24 hours of undisturbed incubation. After the incubation, the centrifuge tube was centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 5 minutes, and the supernatant, used as the particulate extract, was collected for subsequent cell culture. The pellet extraction procedures for the Mg-MOF-LEV and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV groups were identical to that of the Mg-MOF group. For the control group, we only took 10 mL of cell culture medium (composed of 10% premium fetal bovine serum, 89% high - glucose DMEM, and 1% penicillin - streptomycin), placed it in a cell incubator, and let it sit undisturbed for 24 hours without any additional treatment or interference. After 24 hours, the culture medium was directly collected and used for the cell culture of the control group. In the preparation of extracts for the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;NIR group, particles were subjected to NIR (808 nm, 2.0 W cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2\u003c/sup\u003e) intervention for ten minutes during their preparation; all other steps followed the protocol used for obtaining extracts from the Mg-MOF group.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec18\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eBiocompatibility Test\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFirst, each well of a 96 - well cell culture plate was filled with 150 \u0026micro;L of cell suspension at 10,000 cells/mL. After a 24-hour incubation period, the culture medium was replaced with fresh pellet extraction solution to continue the cultivation process. Then, at 24 - and 72 - hour intervals, cells were stained with a live/dead assay kit and observed under a fluorescence microscope to evaluate morphology, with green and red fluorescence indicating live and dead cells respectively.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec19\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eCell Proliferation Analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eEach well of a 96 - well cell culture plate was filled with 150 \u0026micro;L of cell suspension (10,000 cells/mL). After 24 hours of initial culture, the medium was replaced with fresh particulate extract to support further cell growth. To assess cell proliferation at 24 hours or 72 hours post - treatment, a CCK \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;8 assay was used. The steps were as follows: 10% CCK \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;8 solution was added to the culture medium, followed by a 1 - hour reaction. The reaction mixture was then transferred into an automatic enzyme labeling instrument for measurement reader for measurement; absorbance (OD) values were recorded at a wavelength of 450 nm.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec20\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eALP and ARS staining\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eEach well of a 6 - well cell culture plate was filled with 3 mL of cell suspension (10,000 cells/mL). After 24 - hour incubation for cell attachment, the medium was replaced with fresh particulate extract and osteogenic induction solution to continue cell culture. Following 14 days of incubation, the medium was aspirated from the wells, and a fixation solution was added to each well for 30 minutes to fix the cells. Post-fixation, the cells were rinsed with PBS solution (pH 7.4) to remove the fixative. Next, 500 \u0026micro;L of either Alizarin Red S (ARS) or Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) staining solution was applied to the wells for a staining period of 60 minutes. Finally, after the staining procedure, the staining solution was aspirated, and any residual dye was washed away using PBS solution (pH 7.4). The results from the ARS and ALP staining were then observed under a microscope. And the experimental results of each group were subjected to data extraction and analysis using ImageJ Version 1.54.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec21\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eImmunofluorescence staining\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn a 24 - well cell culture plate, 1 mL of cell suspension (10,000 cells/mL) was added and incubated for 24 hours. After 24 hours, the initial culture medium was replaced with particulate extract from each group, and cultured for another day. On day 3, the particulate extract was removed from the 24 - well plate, and immunofluorescence staining was carried out. Cells were fixed, permeabilized, and blocked, then incubated with primary and secondary antibodies in turn. Finally, antibody fluorescence was detected with a fluorescence microscope to analyze the location and expression level of the target protein. And the experimental results of each group were subjected to data extraction and analysis using ImageJ Version 1.54. For detailed procedures, please refer to this article \u003csup\u003e[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec22\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eqRT-PCR\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn addition to the aforementioned experiments, this study employed quantitative real-time PCR technology to assess the expression of osteogenesis-related genes in mBMSCs. At the start, mBMSCs were cultured for 7 days under identical conditions. Then, mRNA was extracted from cells using column - purification. Subsequently, the extracted mRNA was converted into cDNA using the TakaraBrisript First - Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit. This study used a SYBR Green kit for qRT - PCR detection and the 2 - ΔΔCt method to measure the relative expression of mRNA.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec23\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStatistical analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn this experiment, we used a statistically standard expression for all the collected quantitative data, namely that each set of data was presented in the form of mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;standard deviation (mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SD). To ensure the reliability of our findings, each in vitro study was conducted with three replicate groups, with each group being tested three times. The statistical analysis of the data was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the aid of SPSS software, version 25.0. The significance of differences in the numerical data was set at a threshold of \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Results and Discussion","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec25\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eSEM analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eMg-MOF has garnered significant attention due to its high specific surface area, substantial porosity, and tunable chemical functionality. Owing to its unique coordination characteristics, Mg-MOF particles belonging to the hexagonal crystal system readily adopt various morphologies during synthesis, including stalk-like, spindle-like, shell-like, and square shapes \u003csup\u003e[22]\u003c/sup\u003e. The synthesized sample particles' microstructure was analyzed via SEM. As shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eA-C, the Mg-MOF particles mainly display a stalk-like morphology, consistent with prior researchers' descriptions \u003csup\u003e[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/sup\u003e. Furthermore, the morphology of Mg-MOF-LEV particles is largely consistent with that of Mg-MOF particles, indicating that the incorporation of LEV does not compromise the structural integrity of Mg-MOF. In contrast, PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles manifest as tightly clustered aggregates where PDA effectively consolidates numerous individual particles.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec26\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eXRD analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo gain deeper insights into the chemical composition of the synthesized sample particles, XRD analyses were performed on each sample group. As shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eD, the XRD pattern of Mg-MOF has sharp diffraction peaks at 2θ of 11.8\u0026deg; and 18.1\u0026deg;, attributed to the (300) and (510) crystal planes \u003csup\u003e[25]\u003c/sup\u003e. These peaks are in agreement with previously reported data. Additionally, LEV exhibits sharp characteristic peaks at 2θ values of 6.5\u0026deg;, 9.7\u0026deg;, 13.1\u0026deg;, 15.7\u0026deg;, 19.3\u0026deg;, 19.9\u0026deg;, and 26.6\u0026deg;, confirming its crystalline nature \u003csup\u003e[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/sup\u003e. However, it is noteworthy that the diffraction peak associated with LEV is present in the XRD pattern of Mg-MOF-LEV samples. This could be attributed to LEV being encapsulated within the Mg-MOF framework or its relatively low concentration. Furthermore, the LEV-related diffraction peaks are undetectable in the XRD spectra of the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles. This alteration is likely a result of the coating effect of PDA on Mg-MOF-LEV. Moreover, the XRD spectra of PDA did not show any obvious characteristic peaks, completely without the intensity of the diffraction peaks associated with LEV in the XRD spectra of the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV sample. This change may be a result of the coating effect of PDA on Mg-MOF-LEV.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec27\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eFTIR analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn this study, FTIR was employed to investigate component interactions within PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles. As shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eE, the levofloxacin spectrum reveals characteristic peaks indicative of C-F stretching vibrations at 1250 cm⁻\u0026sup1;, C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;O stretching vibrations at 1620 cm⁻\u0026sup1;, and O-H stretching vibrations at 3433 cm⁻\u0026sup1;. The spectrum for Mg-MOF indicates an observable peak related to Mg-O vibrations at 581 cm⁻\u0026sup1; \u003csup\u003e[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/sup\u003e. In contrast, within MG-MOF-LEV particle spectra there is a shift in this vibration from 581 cm⁻\u0026sup1; to 592 cm⁻\u0026sup1;, alongside confirmation of levofloxacin\u0026rsquo;s C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;O stretching vibration appearing at approximately 1620 cm⁻\u0026sup1; \u003csup\u003e[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/sup\u003e. This shift in magnesium oxide vibrational frequency coupled with new appearances confirms successful loading of LEV into Mg-MOF-LEV structures. The characteristic peaks of PDA FTIR spectra did not intersect with the Mg-MOF-LEV characteristic peaks, while the spectra obtained in the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV sample belonging to the Mg-MOF-LEV particles disappeared, a phenomenon may be related to the encapsulation of PDA.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec28\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e\u003cb\u003eBET analysis\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe specific surface area and average pore size of the Mg-MOF particles were 65.487 m\u0026sup2;g\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e and 15.18 nm, respectively, which were measured by the BET method (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eF). The porous structure and large specific surface area are conducive to efficient drug loading \u003csup\u003e[28\u0026ndash;29]\u003c/sup\u003e. After the LEV loading was completed, the specific surface area and average pore size of the Mg-MOF-LEV particles were 17.647 m\u0026sup2;g\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e and 5.01 nm, which showed a significant decrease compared to the Mg-MOF particles, indicating that the LEV drug loading was successful. Based on the decrease in the LEV concentration in the solution, we calculated the drug loading ratio of LEV to be 43.07%.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec29\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003ePhotothermal performance analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFigure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eA illustrates the schematic representation of NIR laser intervention on PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles in this study. Figure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eB presents the thermal imaging results following NIR intervention across all groups. The findings indicate that the photothermal performance of the Control, Mg-MOF, and Mg-MOF-LEV groups is suboptimal, whereas the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV group demonstrates exceptional photothermal efficacy, achieving a temperature of 50.9\u0026deg;C after 15 minutes of NIR irradiation. Additionally, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eC depicts the temperature rise and cooling curves for PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles as observed through thermal imaging. The data reveal that both temperature rise and cooling curves exhibit a progressively smooth trend. Furthermore, an assessment of the photothermal stability of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles was conducted (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eD). Notably, their temperature rise curve remained stable after four cycles of NIR laser exposure, underscoring their robust photothermal stability.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eMg ions and LEV release detection\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe average release concentrations of Mg and LEV from PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles are illustrated in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eA-B. Initial experimental results indicated a high release of Mg ions and LEV during the first two days, followed by a gradual stabilization, demonstrating sustained release behavior throughout the testing period. Figure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eC-D show the cumulative release curves for Mg ions and LEV, which gradually flattened. After a 7-day soak, the release amounts reached 1065 \u0026micro;g/mL for Mg ions and 2145 \u0026micro;g/mL for LEV, respectively.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe real-time effects of NIR laser irradiation on Mg ions and LEV release are depicted in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eE-F. Without NIR intervention, the release rates were relatively slow; after 60 minutes of in vitro soaking, Mg ion concentrations were 30.7 \u0026micro;g/mL, and LEV concentrations were 79.8 \u0026micro;g/mL. In contrast, NIR laser intervention significantly increased these release rates, with Mg ion concentrations reaching 57.7 \u0026micro;g/mL and LEV concentrations reaching 141.5 \u0026micro;g/mL at 60 minutes. These results suggest that NIR laser control over the release behavior of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles is effective.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec31\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eAntibacterial activity\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eS aureus\u003c/em\u003e is the main pathogen in bone defect infections\u003csup\u003e[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/sup\u003e. Levofloxacin, a preferred antibiotic, effectively inhibits or kills this bacterium, curbing infection spread \u003csup\u003e[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/sup\u003e. In recent years, treatments for bone defects with infection have evolved, featuring surgical, antibiotic, tissue engineering, and biomaterial approaches. Surgery, like debridement and bone resection, removes infected and necrotic tissue\u003csup\u003e[32]\u003c/sup\u003e. Antibiotics, especially LEV, are essential in treatment, with selection based on sensitivity tests and long-term use as needed. Tissue engineering and biomaterials, such as antimicrobial peptide hydrogels, offer new treatment options, preventing infection and promoting bone regeneration\u003csup\u003e[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/sup\u003e. Additionally, research is ongoing into treatments targeting the biofilm formed by \u003cem\u003eS. aureus\u003c/em\u003e during infections, including biofilm-disrupting drugs and materials to boost antibiotic efficacy\u003csup\u003e[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/sup\u003e. Despite progress, challenges like persistent infections, biofilm formation, and antibiotic resistance remain. Thus, integrating multiple treatments and tailoring solutions to individual patients is crucial for improving treatment outcomes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo assess the antibacterial effects of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles under NIR irradiation, bacterial colony counts were evaluated using the DAPI staining method and agar diffusion method post-treatment for each group. Figure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eA shows that no dead bacteria were observed in the Control and Mg-MOF groups, indicating no antibacterial effect from Mg-MOF. However, dead bacteria were observed in the Mg-MOF-LEV, PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV, and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;NIR groups, with the highest number in the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;NIR group.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAs shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eA, the number of bacterial colonies on the agar plate for the Mg-MOF group was similar to the Control group, showing no antibacterial effects. However, the Mg-MOF-LEV and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV groups showed significantly fewer bacterial colonies than the Mg-MOF group, though some colonies remained. In contrast, the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;NIR group showed almost no bacterial colonies, indicating a significant antibacterial effect. Figure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eB reveals that for both E. coli and S. aureus, the antibacterial rate of the Mg-MOF group did not exceed 5%. The antibacterial rates in the Mg-MOF-LEV and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV groups, containing LEV, were significantly enhanced to approximately 85%, due to LEV's potent antibacterial properties. The PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;NIR group's antibacterial rate further increased to 98.5\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.27% for \u003cem\u003eS. aureus\u003c/em\u003e and 97.5\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.45% for \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e, indicating a synergistic lethal effect between LEV and the photothermal action of NIR irradiation on bacteria.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe synergistic antibacterial action of LEV and the photothermal effect exhibited by PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles might be attributed to the fact that under the induction of NIR laser, PDA generates a local high-temperature effect that disrupts the integrity of the bacterial biofilm and disturbs the physiological functions of biological macromolecules, thereby causing bacterial death. More importantly, as the biofilm is a major contributing factor for bacterial drug resistance, disrupting its integrity has an enhancing effect on the antibacterial efficacy of antibiotics. Therefore, we investigated the disruptive effect of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;NIR intervention on bacterial biofilms. As shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eC-D, the crystal violet staining results revealed that the Control and Mg-MOF groups maintained a clear and intact biofilm structure, with the dense biofilm remaining undamaged. The biofilms in the Mg-MOF-LEV and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV groups were also hardly disrupted, presenting a relatively intact structure. Nevertheless, after 10 min of near-infrared light irradiation, it could be observed that the biofilms of both \u003cem\u003eS. aureus\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e in the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;NIR group were significantly disrupted, resulting in a considerable loss of biomass. Thus, photothermal therapy demonstrates excellent functionality in eliminating bacterial biofilms.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec32\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eCell viability of mBMSCs\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe biocompatibility of bone repair materials is highly necessary for evaluating their further therapeutic applications in the clinical setting. In this experiment, we cultivated mBMSCs with the extractive liquids of particles prepared under different conditions and utilized live/dead fluorescence staining to assess the cytocompatibility of each group of particles (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eA). On the 3 days of cultivation, each group of cells exhibited a favorable growth morphology, with almost no dead cells being identified, suggesting that all groups demonstrated excellent biocompatibility. Moreover, compared with the Control group, the quantity of mBMSCs in the remaining groups increased, and the increase was most pronounced in the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV group.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdditionally, we employed the CCK-8 method to evaluate the impact of each group on the cellular proliferation of mBMSCs. As depicted in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eB, on the first day, there was no significant disparity in the cellular proliferation trend among all groups. However, as the cell culture period was extended to the third day, in contrast to the Control group, the mBMSCs in the Mg-MOF, Mg-MOF-LEV, and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV groups all manifested a proliferation trend (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). Moreover, under the intervention of NIR, the increase trend in the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;NIR group was the most prominent (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). The experimental results indicate that the Mg ions released by the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;NIR particles possess the ability to promote cellular proliferation. Furthermore, under the intervention of NIR, due to the increased release of Mg ions, the promotion effect on cellular proliferation is further enhanced.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec33\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eOsteogenic differentiation capacity of mBMSCs\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eMg ions have been shown to influence not only the proliferation of BMSCs but also to promote their osteogenic differentiation capacity. The concentration of Mg ions is crucial, as previous research has established a close relationship between Mg ion impact on osteoblasts and their concentration \u003csup\u003e[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/sup\u003e. High concentrations of Mg ions can be toxic to osteoblasts, affecting bone formation rates and hindering bone tissue regeneration \u003csup\u003e[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e36\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/sup\u003e. The proposed mechanism involves Mg ions, as Ca ion antagonists, competing with Ca ions for channels, disrupting the Ca ion balance across cell membranes, and thus impacting the proliferation, differentiation, and mineralization of human BMSCs \u003csup\u003e[37]\u003c/sup\u003e. However, at appropriate concentrations, Mg ions can enhance osteoblast activity and new bone formation \u003csup\u003e[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/sup\u003e. Additionally, appropriate Mg ion concentrations have been found to promote the expression of osteogenic markers \u003csup\u003e[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBuilding on these findings, we investigated the effects of Mg-MOF-LEV particles on the osteogenic differentiation of mBMSCs. ALP staining, a classical method for assessing early osteogenic differentiation, was used to evaluate the impact of bone repair materials on mBMSC osteogenesis \u003csup\u003e[\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR41\" citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e42\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/sup\u003e. Figure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eC-D show that after 7 days, mBMSCs in the Mg-MOF, Mg-MOF-LEV, and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV groups exhibited higher ALP activity than the Control group (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). However, semi-quantitative analysis revealed no significant difference in ALP activity increase among the three groups (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). Notably, the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;NIR group displayed the strongest ALP activity, with a significant increase compared to the other groups, and this enhancement was statistically significant (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eARS staining is a commonly employed staining method that is widely utilized in the research of osteoblast differentiation, bone cells, or tissue pathophysiology \u003csup\u003e[43\u0026ndash;44]\u003c/sup\u003e. By virtue of the chromogenic reaction between alizarin red and extracellular calcium nodules to generate a deep red compound, we can assess the late osteogenic differentiation of cells. As shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eE-F, after culturing mBMSCs with the extractive liquids of each group of particles for 21 days, red calcium deposits emerged in all groups. Notably, compared with the Control group, the red calcium deposits in the Mg-MOF, Mg-MOF-LEV, and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV groups significantly increased (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05), indicating that Mg ions can effectively promote the calcification of the cytosol matrix of mBMSCs. Furthermore, the quantity and area of red calcium deposits in the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;NIR group were the highest among all experimental groups (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05), suggesting that the intervention of NIR promotes osteogenic mineralization of cells.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIF is an analytical method that uses antibodies marked with fluorescent labels to detect and localize specific antigens within cells \u003csup\u003e[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/sup\u003e. In this study, we used IF to assess BMP-2 expression in mBMSCs. As shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig8\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003eA-B, the green fluorescence intensity in the Mg-MOF, Mg-MOF-LEV, and PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV groups was significantly higher compared to the Control group. As depicted in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig8\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003eA-B, the green fluorescence intensity and coverage area of the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;NIR group were the highest among all groups, with a statistically significant difference (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). These results are in line with those of other osteogenic experiments. Collectively, they demonstrate that PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles can significantly enhance cellular activity and promote osteogenic differentiation. Moreover, appropriate NIR intervention can further augment this effect.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo assess the impact of different particulate extracts on mBMSC osteogenic differentiation, we analyzed multiple osteogenesis - related genes via qRT-PCR. As shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig8\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003eC-E, compared with the control group, the expression levels of osteogenesis - related genes (ALP, BMP-2, RUNX2) in the PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;NIR group were significantly elevated (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). These results, consistent with other osteogenic experiments, indicate that PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles can markedly enhance mBMSC osteogenic differentiation, and NIR irradiation further strengthens this effect, possibly due to increased expression of key osteogenic genes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec34\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eResearch focus and future prospects\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAll in all, PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles are promising biomaterials for repairing infectious bone defects with notable clinical potential. PDA, a high-performance photothermal agent, generates local high temperatures under NIR irradiation, triggering controlled LEV release from PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles. This dual photothermal-chemical approach not only directly damages bacterial membranes but also enhances LEV penetration and restores antibiotic sensitivity in resistant bacteria, boosting the antibacterial efficacy of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles. Moreover, these particles effectively combat resistant bacterial infections through combined photothermal-drug synergy and biofilm clearance. Their design aligns with current trends in photothermal-chemical combination therapy research and holds significant promise for clinical application.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn conclusion, the authors have successfully developed PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV nanoparticles that exhibit remarkable antibacterial and osteogenic properties for the treatment of infected bone defects. These nanoparticles were synthesized by incorporating LEV into Mg-MOF during its formation and subsequently coating them with a layer of PDA, which imparts both PTT effects and antibiotic functionality. The findings demonstrate that PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV nanoparticles facilitate a sustained release of LEV, exhibiting significant antibacterial activity. Furthermore, under NIR irradiation, the LEV release rate from these nanoparticles is enhanced, while they also display excellent photothermal characteristics. This results in an effective disruption of bacterial biofilms and augments their antibacterial efficacy. Additionally, PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV nanoparticles show favorable cytocompatibility with BMSCs, and NIR irradiation further accelerates magnesium ion release from the particles, thereby enhancing the osteogenic potential.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e \u003ch2\u003eCompeting interests\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAll authors confirm that they have no existing conflicts of interest to disclose.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAuthor Contribution\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eWei Xiong, Yuxiang Zhou and Yuyi Li contributed equally to this work. Conceptualization and writing\u0026mdash;original draf preparation, Wei Xiong; Methodology and validation, Yuxiang Zhou; Software and formal analysis, Yifeng Yuan and Kang Liu; Investigation and resources, Xudong Huang, Jingkun Li and Zechen Zhang; Data curation and supervision, Yuyi Li; Writing\u0026mdash;review and editing, Xiaolin Shi and Miao'er Li.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAcknowledgements\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82074183); Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (No. LZ22H270002); Zhejiang Province Traditional Chinese Medicine Technology Plan Traditional Chinese Medicine Modernization Special Fund (No. 2020ZX009).\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eData Availability\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eAll the data used and/or analyzed in this study can be obtained from the corresponding author upon request.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWang, X.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Activated allograft combined with induced membrane technique for the reconstruction of infected segmental bone defects. \u003cem\u003eSci\u003cem\u003e. \u003c/em\u003eRep\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e 14, 12587, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-63202-9 (2024). \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYang, X.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Management of infected bone defects of the femoral shaft by Masquelet technique: sequential internal fixation and nail with plate augmentation. \u003cem\u003eBMC\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e. \u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003eMUSCULOSKELETAL\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e. \u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003eDISORDERS\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e 25, 552, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07681-x (2024). \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJiang, X.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Antibiotic-loaded bone cement fixation technique combined with bilateral pectoralis major muscle flaps tension-free management for sternal infection after midline sternotomy. \u003cem\u003eJ\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e Cardiothorac\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e Surg\u003c/em\u003e. 19, 289, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-02749-0 (2024).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHu, X. L.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e 3D printed multifunctional biomimetic bone scaffold combined with TP-Mg nanoparticles for the Infectious bone defects repair. \u003cem\u003eSmall\u003c/em\u003e. 20, 2403681, https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202403681 (2024).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eXia, D. M.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e The effect of pore size on cell behavior in mesoporous bioglass scaffolds for bone regeneration. \u003cem\u003eAppl\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e Mater\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e Today\u003c/em\u003e. 29, 101607, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2022.101607 (2022).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWu, Y. T.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Photothermal sensitive nanocomposite hydrogel for infectious bone defects. \u003cem\u003eBone\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e Res\u003c/em\u003e. 13, 22, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41413-024-00377-x (2025). \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHuang, L.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Advancements in GelMA bioactive hydrogels: strategies for infection control and bone tissue regeneration. \u003cem\u003eTheranostics\u003c/em\u003e. 15, 460-493, https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.103725 (2025).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGhaseminejad-Raeini, A. et al. Antibiotic-coated intramedullary nailing managing long bone infected non-unions: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. \u003cem\u003eAntibiotics-Basel\u003c/em\u003e 13, https://doi.org/ 6910.3390/antibiotics13010069 (2024).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eXiong, W.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Cofe\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e nanoparticles coated with mesoporous silica and loaded with naringin and levofloxacin for repair of infectious bone defects. \u003cem\u003eAcs\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e Appl\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e Nano\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e Mater\u003c/em\u003e. 7, 21936-21950, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.4c03876 (2024).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKeremu, A.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e 3D printed PLGA scaffold with nano-hydroxyapatite carrying linezolid for treatment of infected bone defects. \u003cem\u003eBiomed\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e Pharmacother\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cem\u003e172\u003c/em\u003e, 116228, https://doi.org/11622810.1016/j.biopha.2024.116228 (2024).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChandra, D. K., Kumar, A. \u0026amp; Mahapatra, C. Ultrasonic synthesis of Ag@CNT-Based metal-organic framework (MOF) for enhanced synergetic antimicrobial activity against. \u003cem\u003eJom\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e-Us\u003c/em\u003e. 76, 5626-5642, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-024-06714-z (2024).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChandra, D. K., Kumar, A. \u0026amp; Mahapatra, C. Smart nano-hybrid metal-organic frameworks: Revolutionizing advancements, applications, and challenges in biomedical therapeutics and diagnostics. \u003cem\u003eHybrid\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e Adv.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e \u003c/em\u003e9, 100406, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hybadv.2025.100406 (2025).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBigham, A.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e MOFs and MOF-Based composites as next-generation materials for wound healing and dressings. \u003cem\u003eSmall\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cem\u003e20\u003c/em\u003e(30), e2311903, https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202311903 (2024).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSong, T. Y., Duperthuy, M. \u0026amp; Wai, S. N. Sub-optimal treatment of bacterial biofilms. \u003cem\u003eAntibiotics\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cem\u003e5\u003c/em\u003e, 23, https://doi.org/10.3390/Antibiotics5020023 (2016).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLiu, H.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Nanomaterials-based photothermal therapies for antibacterial applications. \u003cem\u003eMater Design\u003c/em\u003e 233, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112231 (2023).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLiu, D. K.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Nano Sim@ZIF8@PDA modified injectable temperature sensitive nanocomposite hydrogel for photothermal/drug therapy for peri-implantitis. \u003cem\u003eCarbohyd. Polym.\u003c/em\u003e 354, 123327, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2025.123327 (2025).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNaskar, A. \u0026amp; Kim, K. S. Friends against the foe: synergistic photothermal and photodynamic therapy against bacterial infections. Pharmaceutics\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e15\u003c/em\u003e, 1116, https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15041116 (2023).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHe, W.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Highly efficient photothermal nanoparticles for the rapid eradication of bacterial biofilms. \u003cem\u003eNanoscale\u003c/em\u003e. 13, 13610-13616, https://doi.org/10.1039/d1nr03471e (2021).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWang, B.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Regulating the release of Mg-MOF from degradable bone cement by coating Mg-MOF with oxidized dextran/gelatin. \u003cem\u003eNew. J. Chem.\u003c/em\u003e 47, 18591-18602, https://doi.org/10.1039/d3nj02993j (2023).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWang, B.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Multifunctional magnesium-organic framework doped biodegradable bone cement for antibacterial growth, inflammatory regulation and osteogenic differentiation. \u003cem\u003eJ. Mater. Chem. B.\u003c/em\u003e 11, 2872-2885, https://doi.org/10.1039/d2tb02705d (2023).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eXiong, W.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Direct osteogenesis and immunomodulation dual function sustained release of naringin from the polymer scaffold. \u003cem\u003eJ\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cem\u003eMater\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e Chem\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e B\u003c/em\u003e. 11, 10896-10907, https://doi.org/10.1039/d3tb01555f (2023).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBao, Z. B., Yu, L. A., Ren, Q. L., Lu, X. Y. \u0026amp; Deng, S. G. Adsorption of CO and CH on a magnesium-based metal organic framework. \u003cem\u003eJ. Colloid. Interf. Sci\u003c/em\u003e. 353, 549-556, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2010.09.065 (2011).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGe, Y. et al. An Mg-MOFs based multifunctional medicine for the treatment of osteoporotic pain. Mat\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e Sci\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e Eng\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e C-Mater. 129, 112386, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2021.112386 (2021).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eXie, S.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e MOF-74-M (M = Mn, Co, Ni, Zn, MnCo, MnNi, and MnZn) for low-temperature NH3-SCR and in situ DRIFTS study reaction mechanism. \u003cem\u003eACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces.\u003c/em\u003e 12, 48476-48485, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c11035 (2020).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHu, J. Q., Chen, Y., Zhang, H. \u0026amp; Chen, Z. X. Controlled syntheses of Mg-MOF-74 nanorods for drug delivery. \u003cem\u003eJ. Solid. State. Chem.\u003c/em\u003e 294, 121853, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2020.121853 (2021).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSchnabel, J., Ettlinger, R. \u0026amp; Bunzen, H. Zn-MOF-74 as pH-Responsive Drug-Delivery System of Arsenic Trioxide. \u003cem\u003eChemnanomat.\u003c/em\u003e 6, 1229-1236, https://doi.org/10.1002/cnma.202000221 (2020).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePuppi, D., Piras, A. M., Pirosa, A., Sandreschi, S. \u0026amp; Chiellini, F. Levofloxacin-loaded star poly(\u0026epsilon;-caprolactone) scaffolds by additive manufacturing. \u003cem\u003eJ. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med.\u003c/em\u003e 27, 44, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-015-5658-1 (2016).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFeng, Y. F.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Antibodies@MOFs: An In Vitro Protective Coating for Preparation and Storage of Biopharmaceuticals. \u003cem\u003eAdv. Mater.\u003c/em\u003e 2019, 31, 1805148, https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201805148 (2019). \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFreund, R., L\u0026auml;chelt, U., Gruber, T., R\u0026uuml;hle, B. \u0026amp; Wuttke, S. Multifunctional efficiency: extending the concept of atom economy to functional nanomaterials. \u003cem\u003eAcs Nano\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e 12, 2094-2105, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b00932 (2018).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ebdulrehman, T.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Advances in the targeted theragnostics of osteomyelitis caused by. \u003cem\u003eArch\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e Microbiol\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cstrong\u003e206\u003c/strong\u003e, https://doi.org/28810.1007/s00203-024-04015-2 (2024).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSenneville, E.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Safety of prolonged high-dose levofloxacin therapy for bone infections. \u003cem\u003eJ\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e Chemotherapy\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cstrong\u003e19\u003c/strong\u003e, 688-693, https://doi.org/10.1179/joc.2007.19.6.688 (2007).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJensen, L. K., Hartmann, K. T., Witzmann, F., Asbach, P. \u0026amp; Stewart, P. S. Bone infection evolution. \u003cem\u003eInjury\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cstrong\u003e55\u003c/strong\u003e, 111826, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2024.111826 (2024).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHu, B. H. et al. Supramolecular hydrogels for antimicrobial therapy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47(18), 6917-6929, https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cs00128f(2018).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFerreira, M.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Levofloxacin-loaded bone cement delivery system: Highly effective against intracellular bacteria and biofilms. \u003cem\u003eInt\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e J\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e Pharmaceut\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cstrong\u003e532\u003c/strong\u003e, 241-248, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.08.089 (2017).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGu, Y. F.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Three-dimensional printed Mg-doped \u0026beta;-TCP bone tissue engineering scaffolds: effects of magnesium ion concentration on osteogenesis and angiogenesis. \u003cem\u003eTissue\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e Eng\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e Regen\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e Med\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e 16, 415-429, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-019-00192-0 (2019). \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLiang, L. X.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Stimulation of and osteogenesis by Ti-Mg alloys with the sustained-release function of magnesium ions. \u003cem\u003eColloid\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e Surface\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e B\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e 197, 111360, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111360 (2021). \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHung, C., Chaya, A., Liu, K., Verdelis, K. \u0026amp; Sfeir, C. The role of magnesium ions in bone regeneration involves the canonical Wnt signaling pathway. \u003cem\u003eActa Biomater.\u003c/em\u003e 98, 246-255, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.001 (2019). \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChen, Z., Zhang, W., Wang, M., Backman, L. J. \u0026amp; Chen, J. Effects of zinc, magnesium, and iron ions on bone tissue engineering. \u003cem\u003eAcs Biomater. Sci. Eng.\u003c/em\u003e 8, 2321-2335 , https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00368 (2022).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZhang, X. et al. A novel magnesium ion-incorporating dual-crosslinked hydrogel to improve bone scaffold-mediated osteogenesis and angiogenesis. \u003cem\u003eMat\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e Sci\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e. \u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003eEng\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e C-Mater\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e 121, 111868, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2021.111868 (2021).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZhao, Y. N.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Construction of macroporous magnesium phosphate-based bone cement with sustained drug release. \u003cem\u003eMater\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e Design\u003c/em\u003e. 200, 109466, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109466 (2021).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eQian, G. W.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Enhancing bone scaffold interfacial reinforcement through in situ growth of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) on strontium carbonate: Achieving high strength and osteoimmunomodulation. \u003cem\u003eJ\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e Colloid\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e Interf\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e Sci\u003c/em\u003e. 655, 43-57, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2023.10.133 (2024).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAn, J.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Natural products for treatment of osteoporosis: The effects and mechanisms on promoting osteoblast-mediated bone formation. \u003cem\u003eLife\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e Sci\u003c/em\u003e. 147, 46-58, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2016.01.024 (2016).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLi, M. M., Zhao, P. Z., Wang, J. W., Zhang, X. C. \u0026amp; Li, J. Functional antimicrobial peptide-loaded 3D scaffolds for infected bone defect treatment with AI and multidimensional printing. \u003cem\u003eMater\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e Horiz\u003c/em\u003e. 12, 20-36, https://doi.org/10.1039/d4mh01124d (2025).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLiu, Q.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Recent advances of osterix transcription factor in osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. \u003cem\u003eFront. Cell. Dev. Biol. \u003c/em\u003e8, 601224, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.601224 (2020).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCastanheira, E. J.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e 3D-printed injectable nanocomposite cryogel scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration. \u003cem\u003eMater\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e Today\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e Nano\u003c/em\u003e. 28, 100519, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtnano.2024.100519 (2024).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZheng, Y. Y.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e A programmed surface on polyetheretherketone for sequentially dictating osteoimmunomodulation and bone regeneration to achieve ameliorative osseointegration under osteoporotic conditions. \u003cem\u003eBioact\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e Mater\u003c/em\u003e. 14, 364-376, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.01.042 (2022).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Mg-MOF, osteogenic, antibacterial, levofloxacin, polydopamine","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5846374/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5846374/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eInfectious bone defect is a condition where infection and bone defect occur simultaneously. The simultaneous achievement of effective antimicrobial management and enhanced bone regeneration continues to present a major hurdle in musculoskeletal therapeutics. To address these limitations, we have developed a novel osteoconductive material, this material (PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV) consists of Magnesium-based metal-organic frameworks (Mg-MOF) particles loaded with the antibiotic levofloxacin (LEV) and coated with polydopamine (PDA), which integrates photothermal therapy with antibiotic delivery to combat bacterial drug resistance and facilitate bone tissue regeneration. Under near-infrared (NIR) irradiation, PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles demonstrate superior antibacterial efficacy and enhanced osteogenic potential. Drug release studies indicate that NIR irradiation significantly increases LEV release by 337% and Mg ions release by 196% compared to standard conditions. Furthermore, in vitro antibacterial assays confirm that NIR irradiation markedly enhances the antibacterial activity of PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV particles, achieving inhibition rates of 97.5\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.45% against Escherichia coli (\u003cem\u003eE. coli\u003c/em\u003e) and 98.5\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.27% against Staphylococcus aureus (\u003cem\u003eS. aureus\u003c/em\u003e). The photothermal therapy mediated by NIR irradiation not only enhances antibacterial efficacy but also directly stimulates osteogenic differentiation and calcium deposition in mBMSCs, positioning PDA@Mg-MOF-LEV as a multi-modal therapeutic platform for infective osteogenesis.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"In vitro assessment of the osteogenic and antibacterial capabilities of Mg-MOF particles with encapsulated levofloxacin within polydopamine","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-04-10 06:02:59","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5846374/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Accepted","date":"2025-07-21T15:36:40+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2025-05-14T07:48:24+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2025-05-14T07:01:15+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-04-11T06:22:13+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"304628072671028757380787820080376732745","date":"2025-04-11T04:55:50+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2025-04-09T04:14:29+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2025-04-01T10:08:24+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Scientific Reports","date":"2025-03-23T04:47:44+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"4f43be46-ce63-4fab-9bf8-f1d57ebeeeb6","owner":[],"postedDate":"April 10th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[{"id":46883690,"name":"Physical sciences/Materials science/Nanoscale materials/Nanoparticles"},{"id":46883691,"name":"Biological sciences/Drug discovery/Drug delivery"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-07-28T16:07:06+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-5846374","link":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13056-6","journal":{"identity":"scientific-reports","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Scientific Reports"},"publishedOn":"2025-07-23 15:58:19","publishedOnDateReadable":"July 23rd, 2025"},"versionCreatedAt":"2025-04-10 06:02:59","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1038/s41598-025-13056-6","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13056-6","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-5846374","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-5846374","identity":"rs-5846374","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00