A replication that requires replication: Commentary on Caton et al. (2022)

2022 · doi:10.31234/osf.io/7c4gj
preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

This paper comments on Caton et al's (2022) direct replication of Třebický et al (2013) . In this commentary, we provide our reflections on several points raised by this direct replication. Specifically, we focus on three main areas: i) a critique of the stimuli used, ii) analytic decisions taken in the original study, and iii) shape analysis of the direct replication.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00