Full text
5,967 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
UFT-ID 2.0: Constraint-First Information Dynamics and Deterministic Recovery | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 8 January 2026 V1 Latest version Share on UFT-ID 2.0: Constraint-First Information Dynamics and Deterministic Recovery Author : Trent Slade 0009-0002-4515-9237 [email protected] Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176790865.55905239/v1 175 views 72 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract This preprint formalizes Unified Field Theory of Information Dynamics (UFT-ID) 2.0, a constraint-first framework for modeling informational evolution. The central claim is that information dynamics are generically overcomplete, while stable and predictable behavior arises from geometric admissibility constraints that define a privileged subspace of legal states. Deviations from this admissible region are detectable as violations, accumulate a quadratic tension functional, and-upon crossing critical thresholds-trigger deterministic recovery via lexicographic state selection. The framework explicitly parallels the logic of quantum error correction (QEC), but applies it to informational evolution on discrete substrates rather than to quantum states. The theory does not claim to replace physical field theories, quantum mechanics, or general relativity; instead, it provides a unifying architectural language for constraint-governed dynamics across physical, computational, and informational domains. Supplementary Material File (uft-id 2.pdf) Download 46.20 KB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 08 January 2026 Copyright This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Keywords constraint-first dynamics deterministic recovery discrete lattice systems information geometry quantum error correction (qec) analogy Authors Affiliations Trent Slade 0009-0002-4515-9237 [email protected] QSOL-IMC View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 175 views 72 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Trent Slade. UFT-ID 2.0: Constraint-First Information Dynamics and Deterministic Recovery. Authorea . 08 January 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176790865.55905239/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.176790865.55905239/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9fe0f6a3286152ad',t:'MTc3OTE3MTI4Nw=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.