A case of an endometriosis associated ovarian carcinoma that could not be diagnosed by preoperative MRI

In: JAPANESE JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC ENDOSCOPY · 2022 · vol. 38(1) , pp. 86–92 · doi:10.5180/jsgoe.38.1_86 · W4285218347
article OA: diamond CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This case report describes an endometriosis-associated ovarian clear cell carcinoma that was initially misdiagnosed as benign intracystic clots on multiple preoperative MRIs.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This paper reports a single case of endometriosis-associated ovarian clear cell carcinoma in a 29-year-old woman with acute abdominal pain and a history of low-dose estrogen-progestin therapy for a left ovarian endometrioma. Although initial pelvic MRI and subsequent pelvic MRIs over time showed intracystic nodules that were suspected to be clots and no malignancy, the cyst and nodules progressively enlarged despite continued LEP therapy and tumor markers remained unchanged. Surgery (laparoscopic cystectomy) found a ruptured cyst with a clear boundary and no contrast enhancement, and histopathology ultimately revealed clear cell carcinoma, prompting left adnexectomy and omental biopsy followed by carboplatin plus paclitaxel. The paper is limited to a single case report and acknowledges imaging failed to diagnose malignancy preoperatively. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically an endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinoma that could not be diagnosed by preoperative MRI.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

We report a case of endometriosis associated ovarian carcinoma that could not be diagnosed using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A 29-year-old woman presented with a 3-year history of acute abdominal pain. MRI revealed a left-sided endometrial cyst measuring 4.5 cm, and she had a history of low-dose estrogen-progestin (LEP) therapy for a left ovarian endometrial cyst. The cyst showed a slight increase in size to 5 cm, 1 year after it was diagnosed; therefore, she underwent pelvic MRI, which did not reveal evidence of malignancy but only showed intracystic nodules, which were suspected to be clots. She continued to receive LEP therapy; however, transvaginal ultrasonography performed 2 years and 6 months after the detection of the cyst revealed an increase in the size of the cyst to 7 cm, and pelvic MRI performed at that time revealed an increase in the size of the nodules, which were suspected to be clots without any evidence of malignancy. Contrast-enhanced pelvic MRI performed 2 years and 10 months after initial diagnosis revealed further growth of both the cyst and nodules; therefore, she underwent surgery. The nodule was enlarged; however, we observed no contrast effect, and the position appeared to have shifted from the ventral to the dorsal aspect. Therefore, we speculated that the nodule was most likely a benign lesion, and performed laparoscopic left ovarian cystectomy. We did not observe any increase in tumor markers during the course of the study. Intraoperatively, the cyst ruptured; however, we could visualize a clear boundary between the cyst and the surrounding parenchyma, and the lesion was easily removed. We detected no abnormalities in the contralateral ovary or the pelvis. Histopathological evaluation of the resected specimen revealed clear cell carcinoma, and we performed, abdominal left adnexectomy and omental biopsy, 1 month after the initial operation. Clear cell carcinoma was not detected in the resected ovary, and she was administered 3 cycles of a combination of carboplatin plus paclitaxel. She has shown no recurrence over 4 months postoperatively.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (15)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK