Flexible selection of working memory representations to reduce cognitive cost

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,175 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Across psychology 1–4, economics 5,6, machine learning 7, and neuroscience 8,9, it is well established that choosing a good internal representation can make complex problems easier to solve. Thus, intelligent behavior depends not only on what is stored in working memory, but on the format in which it is stored. Selecting a lower-load format can substantially reduce the mental effort required for a task, since working-memory load is a major contributor to cognitive cost 10–12. Whether non-human animals make such representational choices, and how these choices are implemented in neural circuits, has remained unclear. Here we show that rats flexibly adjust the format of working memory to reduce cognitive cost. In an egocentric task that encourages an action-based code, rats maintained the relevant information as a stable motor plan supported by frontal cortex. When the same behavioral problem was reformulated in allocentric coordinates, the action-based code became costly, and rats instead stored a sensory trace in auditory cortex. A cost-sensitive model explains which internal format should be used under each task variant and predicted that simplifying the allocentric task would reduce the advantage of a sensory code and drive reinstatement of frontal motor planning; this prediction was confirmed, as rats rapidly returned to a motorplan representation and the frontal cortex again became necessary for performance. These results demonstrate that flexible representational selection is not unique to humans 13 but is present in rodents and reflected in circuit-level reallocation of working memory. This establishes a neural basis for classic theories linking problem representation to computational efficiency and provides a path toward a circuit-level understanding of how the brain selects internal formats to reduce cognitive cost. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes The authors have no conflict of interest nor financial interests. Updates to the text to improve clarity and fix grammatical and spelling errors. https://gitlab.com/sainsbury-wellcome-centre/delab/publications/soundmap-2025

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00