Implementing an Activity Tracker to Increase Motivation for Physical Activity in Diabetic Patients in Primary Care: a SWOT Analysis

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16

This study found that type 2 diabetes patients were satisfied with activity trackers for motivation, and the research team deemed implementation feasible in primary care despite identified challenges.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16 · read from full text

This mixed-methods preprint assessed feasibility and patient satisfaction regarding implementing an activity tracker to increase motivation for physical activity among 15 people with type 2 diabetes in an academic primary health centre in Quebec City, using a satisfaction/acceptability questionnaire and a team SWOT analysis (7 team and health professional members). Quantitatively, 86% of participants reported being satisfied with the activity tracker, and 79% were satisfied with the technical support. The team’s SWOT identified strengths related to the study design, team, and device, while weaknesses included budgetary constraints, turnover, and technical issues, and threats included recruitment, administrative challenges, and technological difficulties. A major caveat stated is that this is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the feasibility of implementing an activity tracker to increase motivation for physical activity among patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care setting, and to assess patient satisfaction with this technology. Design: Mixed methods study using a satisfaction and acceptability questionnaire on an activity tracker (participants) and a questionnaire based on the SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis elements (team). Setting: Academic Primary Health Centre in Quebec City, Canada. Participants: 15 participants with type 2 diabetes who took part in the intervention group, and 7 members of the research team and health professionals who contributed to this project. Methods: : Quantitative variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Qualitative variables from selected answers were reported in frequency tabs. Qualitative variables from open questions were synthesized in a matrix and ranked according to apparition frequency and global importance. A thematic analysis was performed by the first author and validated by two coauthors separately. The information gathered was triangulated to propose recommendations that were then approved by the team. Both quantitative and qualitative results were combined for recommendations. Main findings: In total, 86% of the participants were satisfied with their activity tracker use, and 79% did with the technical support provided by the team. The main strengths of the team members’ perspective were the study design, the team, and the device. The weaknesses were the budgetary constraints, the turnover, and the technical issues. The opportunities were the primary care setting and the common technology. The threats were the recruitment, the administrative challenges, and the technological difficulties. Conclusion: Patients with type 2 diabetes were satisfied with their activity tracker used to improve motivation for physical activity. Research team members agreed that implementation can be done in primary care, but some challenges remain for using this tool in clinical practice regularly.
Full text 14,927 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Implementing an Activity Tracker to Increase Motivation for Physical Activity in Diabetic Patients in Primary Care: a SWOT Analysis | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Implementing an Activity Tracker to Increase Motivation for Physical Activity in Diabetic Patients in Primary Care: a SWOT Analysis Cynthia Pelletier, Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Christian Chabot, Caroline Rhéaume This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1673528/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Objectives: To explore the feasibility of implementing an activity tracker to increase motivation for physical activity among patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care setting, and to assess patient satisfaction with this technology. Design: Mixed methods study using a satisfaction and acceptability questionnaire on an activity tracker (participants) and a questionnaire based on the SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis elements (team). Setting: Academic Primary Health Centre in Quebec City, Canada. Participants: 15 participants with type 2 diabetes who took part in the intervention group, and 7 members of the research team and health professionals who contributed to this project. Methods: Quantitative variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Qualitative variables from selected answers were reported in frequency tabs. Qualitative variables from open questions were synthesized in a matrix and ranked according to apparition frequency and global importance. A thematic analysis was performed by the first author and validated by two coauthors separately. The information gathered was triangulated to propose recommendations that were then approved by the team. Both quantitative and qualitative results were combined for recommendations. Main findings: In total, 86% of the participants were satisfied with their activity tracker use, and 79% did with the technical support provided by the team. The main strengths of the team members’ perspective were the study design, the team, and the device. The weaknesses were the budgetary constraints, the turnover, and the technical issues. The opportunities were the primary care setting and the common technology. The threats were the recruitment, the administrative challenges, and the technological difficulties. Conclusion: Patients with type 2 diabetes were satisfied with their activity tracker used to improve motivation for physical activity. Research team members agreed that implementation can be done in primary care, but some challenges remain for using this tool in clinical practice regularly. Activity tracker type 2 diabetes family medicine research SWOT analysis physical activity physical activity motivation Full Text Tables Tables 1 to 8 are available in the Supplementary Files section. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files QuestionnairesatisfactionpatientsFitbitenglish2May282022.pdf SWOT14avril20221Tables.pdf SWOTquestionnaireteamenglish2May282022.pdf Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-1673528","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":109760417,"identity":"c569252b-2fe3-4216-85bf-1704b8689ce9","order_by":0,"name":"Cynthia Pelletier","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Université Laval","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Cynthia","middleName":"","lastName":"Pelletier","suffix":""},{"id":109760418,"identity":"a200406b-3459-4063-aff4-1f103f3354cb","order_by":1,"name":"Marie-Pierre Gagnon","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Université Laval","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Marie-Pierre","middleName":"","lastName":"Gagnon","suffix":""},{"id":109760419,"identity":"ab796662-46b2-41b0-9d2a-41a08d402478","order_by":2,"name":"Christian Chabot","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"VITAM – Centre de recherche en santé durable, CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, Université Laval","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Christian","middleName":"","lastName":"Chabot","suffix":""},{"id":109760420,"identity":"d64f6a09-b2a5-4231-b874-f2811728407e","order_by":3,"name":"Caroline Rhéaume","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Université Laval","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Caroline","middleName":"","lastName":"Rhéaume","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2022-05-19 13:59:22","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1673528/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1673528/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":22139132,"identity":"1228eb5a-f640-4124-8289-1900795e89e6","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-06-01 16:28:27","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":335840,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SWOTMay262022VFMaindocument.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1673528/v1_covered.pdf"},{"id":22139131,"identity":"2050b72c-8160-44d8-a56b-16fac96ee5f7","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-06-01 16:28:23","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":86601,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"QuestionnairesatisfactionpatientsFitbitenglish2May282022.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1673528/v1/a8b89b21e4f3178bb0edafd2.pdf"},{"id":22138561,"identity":"5d03aafd-afe7-43da-b778-b7a63082a319","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-06-01 16:23:23","extension":"pdf","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":165829,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SWOT14avril20221Tables.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1673528/v1/7172f5c446cd0fb24e2ada91.pdf"},{"id":22138559,"identity":"0e599fdd-4f83-4416-b3f5-fbf8357d8483","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-06-01 16:23:23","extension":"pdf","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":84833,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SWOTquestionnaireteamenglish2May282022.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1673528/v1/331d3961f732e817069cf41d.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Implementing an Activity Tracker to Increase Motivation for Physical Activity in Diabetic Patients in Primary Care: a SWOT Analysis","fulltext":[{"header":"Full Text","content":"This preprint is available for \u003ca href='/article/rs-1673528/latest.pdf' target='_blank'\u003edownload as a PDF\u003c/a\u003e."},{"header":"Tables","content":"\u003cp\u003eTables 1 to 8 are available in the Supplementary Files section.\u003c/p\u003e "}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Activity tracker, type 2 diabetes, family medicine research, SWOT analysis, physical activity, physical activity motivation","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1673528/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1673528/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eObjectives:\u003c/strong\u003e To explore the feasibility of implementing an activity tracker to increase motivation for physical activity among patients with type\u0026nbsp;2 diabetes in primary care setting, and to assess patient satisfaction with this technology.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDesign:\u003c/strong\u003e Mixed methods study using a satisfaction and acceptability questionnaire on an activity tracker (participants) and a questionnaire based on the SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats)\u0026nbsp;analysis elements (team).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSetting: \u003c/strong\u003eAcademic Primary Health Centre in Quebec City, Canada.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eParticipants:\u003c/strong\u003e 15\u0026nbsp;participants with type\u0026nbsp;2 diabetes who took part in the intervention group, and 7\u0026nbsp;members of the research team and health professionals who contributed to this project.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMethods:\u003c/strong\u003e Quantitative variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Qualitative variables from selected answers were reported in frequency tabs. Qualitative variables from open questions were synthesized in a matrix and ranked according to apparition frequency and global importance. A thematic analysis was performed by the first author and validated by two coauthors separately. The information gathered was triangulated to propose recommendations that were then approved by the team. Both quantitative and qualitative results were combined for recommendations.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMain findings: \u003c/strong\u003eIn total, 86% of the participants were satisfied with their activity tracker use, and 79% did with the technical support provided by the team. The main strengths of the team members’ perspective were the study design, the team, and the device. The weaknesses were the budgetary constraints, the turnover, and the technical issues. The opportunities were the primary care setting and the common technology. The threats were the recruitment, the administrative challenges, and the technological difficulties.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusion: \u003c/strong\u003ePatients with type\u0026nbsp;2 diabetes were satisfied with their activity tracker used to improve motivation for physical activity. Research team members agreed that implementation can be done in primary care, but some challenges remain for using this tool in clinical practice regularly.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Implementing an Activity Tracker to Increase Motivation for Physical Activity in Diabetic Patients in Primary Care: a SWOT Analysis","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2022-06-01 16:23:21","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1673528/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"187ca866-e299-48ba-80c5-b2404f997a05","owner":[],"postedDate":"June 1st, 2022","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2022-08-30T06:44:19+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2022-06-01 16:23:21","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-1673528","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-1673528","identity":"rs-1673528","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"cBFmMYwuxLRRLfASyISRj","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00