Transvaginal Elastosonography as an Imaging Technique for Diagnosing Adenomyosis

other OA: closed public-domain-us ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13

Transvaginal elastosonography accurately differentiated adenomyosis from fibroids by measuring lesion stiffness, which correlated with fibrosis, hormonal expression, and symptom severity.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13 · read from full text

This paper investigated whether lesional stiffness measured by transvaginal elastosonography (TVESG) correlates with histologic fibrosis extent in adenomyosis and whether TVESG can therefore diagnose adenomyosis. In two studies, the authors compared TVESG-measured stiffness in 35 women with histologically confirmed adenomyosis versus control myometrium and uterine fibroid tissue, and validated associations in 112 adenomyosis patients versus fibroid and control groups using transvaginal ultrasound and TVESG. Lesional stiffness was higher in adenomyosis than uterine fibroids and higher than control myometrium, positively correlating with fibrosis extent and uterine size but inversely with E-cadherin and progesterone receptor expression; stiffness also correlated with dysmenorrhea severity and menses amount. Relevance to endometriosis: the paper notes prior literature on associations between adenomyosis and endometriosis in the references, though its primary focus is adenomyosis imaging and elastography-based diagnosis rather than endometriosis mechanisms or detection.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that the lesional stiffness as measured by transvaginal elastosonography (TVESG) correlates with the extent of fibrosis in adenomyotic (AM) lesions, and thus TVESG can be used to diagnose AM, we conducted 2 studies. The first evaluated the relationship, if any, between lesional stiffness and lesional histology in 35 women with histologically confirmed AM in comparison with tissue stiffness in 11 control myometrial (CM) and 8 uterine fibroids (UFs) tissue samples. The second validated the relationship between lesional stiffness and the severity of dysmenorrhea and the amount of menses in AM patients by recruiting 112 patients diagnosed with AM, 67 with UF, and 130 controls. Transvaginal ultrasound and TVESG were both performed. We found that the stiffness of AM lesions was significantly higher than that of UF, which, in turn, was significantly higher than that of CM. Lesional stiffness correlated positively with uterine size and the extent of lesional fibrosis but negatively with E-cadherin and progesterone receptor expression levels. Lesional stiffness also correlated with the severity of dysmenorrhea as well as the amount of menses. Thus, TVESG can improve the diagnostic accuracy for AM, especially in differential diagnosis of AM from UF. The correlation between lesional stiffness and the extent of fibrosis and hormonal receptor expression and the severity of symptomology strongly suggests that TVESG not only can provide an instant assessment of the developmental stage of AM lesions but also may be used to guide the choice of the best treatment modality for the patient.
Full text 11,059 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that the lesional stiffness as measured by transvaginal elastosonography (TVESG) correlates with the extent of fibrosis in adenomyotic (AM) lesions, and thus TVESG can be used to diagnose AM, we conducted 2 studies. The first evaluated the relationship, if any, between lesional stiffness and lesional histology in 35 women with histologically confirmed AM in comparison with tissue stiffness in I I control myometrial (CM) and 8 uterine fibroids (UFs) tissue samples. The second validated the relationship between lesional stiffness and the severity of dysmenorrhea and the amount of menses in AM patients by recruiting I 12 patients diagnosed with AM, 67 with UF, and 130 controls. Transvaginal ultrasound and TVESG were both performed. We found that the stiffness of AM lesions was significantly higher than that of UF, which, in turn, was significantly higher than that of CM. Lesional stiffness correlated positively with uterine size and the extent of lesional fibrosis but negatively with E-cadherin and progesterone receptor expression levels. Lesional stiffness also correlated with the severity of dysmenorrhea as well as the amount of menses. Thus, TVESG can improve the diagnostic accuracy for AM, especially in differential diagnosis of AM from UF. The correlation between lesional stiffness and the extent of fibrosis and hormonal receptor expression and the severity of symptomology strongly suggests that TVESG not only can provide an instant assessment of the developmental stage of AM lesions but also may be used to guide the choice of the best treatment modality for the patient. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Bergeron C, Amant F, Ferenczy A. Pathology and physiopathology of adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006; 20(4):511–521. Levgur M, Abadi MA, Tucker A. Adenomyosis: symptoms, histology, and pregnancy terminations. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95(5):688–691. Louis LS, Saso S, Chatterjee J, Barsoum E, Al-Samarrai M. Adenomyosis and infertility. ReprodBiomed Online. 2012;24(5):586; author reply 587. Li X, Liu X, Guo SW. Clinical profiles of 710 premenopausal women with adenomyosis who underwent hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40(2):485–494. Vercellini P, Vigano P, Somigliana E, Daguati R, Abbiati A, Fedele L. Adenomyosis: epidemiological factors. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20(4):465–477. Benagiano G, Habiba M, Brosens I. The pathophysiology of uterine adenomyosis: an update. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(3):572–579. Leyendecker G, Bilgicyildirim A, Inacker M, et al. Adenomyosis and endometriosis. Revisiting their association and further insights into the mechanisms of auto-traumatisation. An MRI study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291(4):917–932. Grow DR, Filer RB. Treatment of adenomyosis with long-term GnRH analogues: a case report. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78(3 pt 2): 538–539. Bragheto AM, Caserta N, Bahamondes L, Petta CA. Effectiveness of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the treatment of adenomyosis diagnosed and monitored by magnetic resonance imaging. Contraception. 2007;76(3):195–199. Farquhar C, Brosens I. Medical and surgical management of adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;20(4):603–616. Zhang Q, Duan J, Liu X, Guo SW. Platelets drive smooth muscle metaplasia and fibrogenesis in endometriosis through epithelial-mesenchymal transition and fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transdif-ferentiation. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2016;428:1–16. Zhang Q, Liu X, Guo SW. Progressive development of endometriosis and its hindrance by anti-platelet treatment in mice with induced endometriosis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;34(2):124–136. Liu X, Shen S, Qi Q, Zhang H, Guo SW. Corroborating evidence for platelet-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition and fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transdifferentiation in the development of adenomyosis. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(4):734–749. Shen M, Liu X, Zhang H, Guo SW. Transforming growth factor pi signaling coincides with epithelial-mesenchymal transition and fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transdifferentiation in the development of adenomyosis in mice [published online February 2016.]. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(2):355–369. Harada T, Khine YM, Kaponis A, Nikellis T, Decavalas G, Taniguchi F. The impact of adenomyosis on women’s fertility. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2016;71(9):557–568. Hasdemir PS, Farasat M, Aydin C, Ozyurt BC, Guvenal T, Pekindil G. The role of adenomyosis in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016;76(8):882–887. Shwayder J, Sakhei K. Imaging for uterine myomas and adenomyosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(3):362–376. Meredith SM, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(1):107.e1–e6. Tamai K, Koyama T, Umeoka S, Saga T, Fujii S, Togashi K. Spectrum of MR features in adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20(4):583–602. Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, Sorensen JS, Ledertoug S, Olesen F. Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2001; 76(3):588–594. Stewart EA, Clinical practice, uterine fibroids. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(17):1646–1655. Shiina T, Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML, et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: part 1: basic principles and terminology. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41(5):1126–1147. Cosgrove D, Piscaglia F, Bamber J, et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 2: clinical applications. Ultraschall Med. 2013;34(3):238–253. Tessarolo M, Bonino L, Camanni M, Deltetto F. Elastosonography: a possible new tool for diagnosis of adenomyosis? Eur Radiol. 2011;21(7):1546–1552. Stoelinga B, Hehenkamp WJ, Brolmann HA, Huirne JA. Realtime elastography for assessment of uterine disorders. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43(2):218–226. Frank ML, Schafer SD, Mollers M, et al. Importance of transvaginal elastography in the diagnosis of uterine fibroids and adenomyosis. Ultraschall Med. 2016;37(4):373–378. Acar S, Millar E, Mitkova M, Mitkov V. Value of ultrasound shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Ultrasound. 2016;24(4):205–213. Wyatt KM, Dimmock PW, Walker TJ, O’Brien PM. Determination of total menstrual blood loss. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(1):125–131. Dasharathy SS, Mumford SL, Pollack AZ, et al. Menstrual bleeding patterns among regularly menstruating women. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;175(6):536–545. Ferraz Z, Nogueira-Martins N, Nogueira-Martins F. Adenomyosis: back to the future? Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2017;9(1):15–20. Van den Bosch T, Dueholm M, Leone FP, et al. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(3):284–298. Tatsumi C, Kudo M, Ueshima K, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of hepatic fibrosis for type C chronic hepatitis. Intervirology. 2010; 53(1):76–81. Tatsumi C, Kudo M, Ueshima K, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of hepatic fibrosis using serum fibrotic markers, transient elastography (FibroScan) and real-time tissue elastography. Intervirology. 2008;51(suppl 1):27–33. Fujimoto K, Kato M, Kudo M, et al. Novel image analysis method using ultrasound elastography for noninvasive evaluation of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Oncology. 2013; 84(suppl 1):3–12. Ding D, Liu X, Duan J, Guo SW. Platelets are an unindicted culprit in the development of endometriosis: clinical and experimental evidence. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(4):812–832. Zhang Q, Duan J, Olson M, Fazleabas A, Guo SW. Cellular changes consistent with epithelial-mesenchymal transition and fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transdifferentiation in the progression of experimental endometriosis in baboons. Reprod Sci. 2016; 23(10):1409–1421. Compel C, Silverberg SG. The corpus uteri. In: Compel C, Silverberg SG, eds. Pathology in Gynecology and Obstetrics. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott; 1994:163–283. Nie J, Lu Y, Liu X, Guo SW. Immunoreactivity of progesterone receptor isoform B, nuclear factor kappaB, and ikappabalpha in adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(3):886–889. Sarvazyan A, Hall TJ, Urban MW, Fatemi M, Aglyamov SR, Garra BS. An overview of elastography—an emerging branch of medical imaging. Curr Med Imaging Rev. 2011;7(4):255–282. Stewart EA, Friedman AJ, Peck K, Nowak RA. Relative over-expression of collagen type I and collagen type III messenger ribonucleic acids by uterine leiomyomas during the proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994; 79(3):900–906. Iwahashi M, Muragaki Y. Increased type I and V collagen expression in uterine leiomyomas during the menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(6):2137–2139. Iwahashi M, Muragaki Y, Ikoma M, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of collagen expression in uterine leiomyomata during the menstrual cycle. Exp Titer Med. 2011;2(2):287–290. Carrino DA, Mesiano S, Barker NM, Hurd WW, Caplan AI. Proteoglycans of uterine fibroids and keloid scars: similarity in their proteoglycan composition. Biochem J. 2012;443(2):361–368. Leppert PC, Baginski T, Prupas C, Catherino WH, Pletcher S, Segars JH. Comparative ultrastructure of collagen fibrils in uterine leiomyomas and normal myometrium. Fertil Steril. 2004; 82(suppl3):1182–1187. Gersak MM, Lupsor-Platon M, Badea R, Ciurea A, Dudea SM. Strain elastography (SE) for liver fibrosis estimation - which elastic score to calculate? Med Ultrason. 2016;18(4):481–487. Bulun SE, Monsavais D, Pavone ME, et al. Role of estrogen receptor-beta in endometriosis. Semin Reprod Med. 2012; 30(1):39–45. Liu X, Zhang Q, Guo S-W. Histological and immunohistochemical characterization of the similarity and difference between ovarian endometriomas and deep infiltrating endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2017:1933719117718275. Schiffmann ML, Schafer SD, Schuring AN, et al. Importance of transvaginal ultrasound applying elastography for identifying deep infiltrating endometriosis—a feasibility study. Ultraschall Med. 2014;35(6):561–565. Malik M, Norian J, McCarthy-Keith D, Britten J, Catherino WH. Why leiomyomas are called fibroids: the central role of extracellular matrix in symptomatic women. Semin Reprod Med. 2010; 28(3):169–179. Andres MP, Borrelli GM, Ribeiro J, Baracat EC, Abrao MS, Kho RM. Transvaginal ultrasound for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017:S1553-4650(17):31113–31115. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Liu, X., Ding, D., Ren, Y. et al. Transvaginal Elastosonography as an Imaging Technique for Diagnosing Adenomyosis. Reprod. Sci. 25, 498–514 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719117750752 Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719117750752

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

adenomyosisdysmenorrhea

MeSH descriptors

Adenomyosis Elasticity Imaging Techniques Leiomyoma Myometrium Adenomyosis Adult Female Humans Leiomyoma Middle Aged Myometrium

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (1)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-03T06:10:56.557307+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:20:01.354358+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine