A Study of Fertility Outcome and Recurrence between Laparoscopic Enucleation and Fulgration of Endometriotic cyst wall

In: International Journal of Biomedical Research · 2015 · vol. 6(4) , pp. 255 · doi:10.7439/ijbr.v6i4.1869 · W1554704644
article OA: diamond CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09

Laparoscopic enucleation of endometriotic cyst walls resulted in higher pregnancy rates and lower recurrence compared to drainage and fulgration.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this review was to determine which is the most effective technique for treating an ovarian endometrioma: either cystectomy by stripping of the cyst wall or drainage and fulgration of the cyst wall. Methods: We retrospectively studied 52 infertile women who underwent endometriotic cyst enucleation or drainage and fulgration of the cyst wall in AV Hospital between the year Jan 2010 to Dec 2011. They have been followed for 18 months after laparoscopy for conception. Results: The overall pregnancy rate among all the groups was 46.15 % (24/52) whereas 63% (21/33) among the cyst wall enucleation group conceived either spontaneously or thru ART whereas only 15%(3/19) conceived spontaneously in drainage and fulgration of the cyst wall group. The pregnancy rate for stage IV was relatively low 6.67%(3/45) compared to stage III. Again 21%(4/19) had recurrence after fulgration within 9 months of surgery as compared to 6%(2/33) of the cyst wall enucleation group. But as the number of patients with recurrence is small there is no statistical significance among the two groups. Conclusions: Laparoscopic excision by stripping method of the endometrioma was associated with a reduced rate of recurrence of the endometrioma and reduced rate of further surgery. It was also associated with an increase rate of subsequent pregnancy either spontaneously or by ART.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometrioma

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (9)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK